<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JBM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Biosciences and Medicines</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-5081</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jbm.2022.108016</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JBM-119343</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Antibiotics Susceptibility Profile of &lt;i&gt;Staphylococcus aureus&lt;/i&gt; Clinical Isolates Collected in Hospitals in the City of Douala (Cameroon)
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jean</surname><given-names>Pierre Nda Mefo’o</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yanne</surname><given-names>Sabekob</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Grace</surname><given-names>Dalle Ngondi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Emmanuel</surname><given-names>Roddy Mengue</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Elodie</surname><given-names>Ngo Malabo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nancy</surname><given-names>Handa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Guy</surname><given-names>Pascal Ngaba</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dieudonné</surname><given-names>Adiogo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Cécile</surname><given-names>Okalla Ebongue</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Laboratory of Clinical Biology, Douala General Hospital, Douala, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Laboratory Unit of the Gyneco-Obstetric, Douala Pediatric Hospital, Douala, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences, Kansas City, MO, USA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Laboratory, Laquintinie Hospital, Douala, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>01</day><month>08</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>08</issue><fpage>188</fpage><lpage>200</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>9,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>20,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>23,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Introduction: 
  <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> is one of the most important agents involved in community and hospital-acquired infections. Due to the multi-drug resistance of strains to antibiotics, treatment to eradicate it is becoming more difficult and poses a global public health problem. 
  Methodology: This was a cross-sectional study conducted from March to August 2020 in hospitals in the city of Douala, including all 
  <em>S. aureus</em> isolates from diagnostic samples. Strain identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing were performed using the Vitek2 Compact
  <sup>TM</sup> (BioMerieux). 
  Results: During the study period, 136 non-repetitive 
  <em>S. aureus</em> strains were identified with a high frequency of methicillin-resistant 
  <em>S. aureus</em> of 78.7%. The majority of the strains originated from the Douala General Hospital (66.9%) and was most frequently isolated from blood culture samples (55.1%). The study of biochemical characteristics showed that most of the strains identified had between 87% and 99% homology with the reference strain. The most active antibiotics were Quinupristin/Dalfopristin (94.2%), Linezolid (87.8%) and Vancomycin (84.2%). Methicillin resistance was associated with decreased susceptibility of 
  <em>S. aureus</em> to other antibiotics such as Gentamycin (44.9%), Erythromycin (38.2%), Tetracycline (38.3%), Trimethoprim (21.4%), Ciprofloxacin (19.1%) and Levofloxacin (24.0%). Inducible MLSb and constitutive resistance phenotypes were identified with 26.7% and 22.8% respectively. 
  Conclusion: The sensitivity of
  <em> S. aureus</em> strains differs from one antibiotic family to another, and remains good for molecules that are not available in our context. The high frequency of Methicillin-Resistant 
  <em>S. aureus</em> shows the continuous progression of multi-resistant strains of 
  <em>S. aureus</em> and their decreased sensitivity to usual antibiotics becomes more and more alarming.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Staphylococcus aureus&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Multidrug Resistance</kwd><kwd> MRSA</kwd><kwd> Douala</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Staphylococci are bacteria that have been implicated in pathologies of varying severity and Staphylococcus aureus ranks first among opportunistic Gram-positive cocci responsible for nosocomial infections [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref2">2</xref>]. Indeed, S. aureus has developed over the years several mechanisms of resistance to antibiotics and actually over 90% of strains produce a penicillinase, PLP2a (penicillin-binding protein) that subsequently leads to cross-resistance between the beta-lactam family (penicillin, carbapenem, cephalosporin) and other families of associated antibiotics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref4">4</xref>]. Due to the continuous progression of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infections, particularly in hospital settings, many studies are being carried out in order to better monitor them, understand their evolution and establish appropriate control strategies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref5">5</xref>]. According to the WHO 2021 report on global antibiotic resistance, people with MRSA have a 64% higher risk of death compared to people with a non-resistant form of the infection; for this purpose, 25 countries have reported S. aureus resistance to Methicillin in 2019 as part of the Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (GLASS) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref6">6</xref>]. In Africa, the WHO reports major gaps in the monitoring of antibiotic resistance due to the lack of data, and the data available is worrying; in some countries, up to 80% of S. aureus resistant to methicillin is noted, which means that the treatment of infections of these strains with conventional antibiotics is ineffective [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref7">7</xref>].</p><p>It is in this context that we carried out this study, the aim of which was to investigate the sensitivity to antibiotics of S. aureus strains isolated in two hospitals in the city of Douala (Cameroon), in order to specify the characteristics of this microorganism.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methodology</title><p>Type and location of the study</p><p>This was a cross-sectional study conducted over a period of 6 months from March 1 to August 31, 2020. The strains were collected in the laboratories of seven public hospitals in Douala city, including: Laquintinie Hospital, General Hospital, Gyneco-Obstetric and Pediatric Hospital, Military Hospital, Deido, Nylon-Brazzaville and Bonassama District Hospitals. All sample analyses were performed at the bacteriology unit of the clinical biology laboratory of the Douala General Hospital (DGH).</p><p>Strains studied</p><p>Non-repetitive strains of S. aureus isolated from diagnostic specimens of patients who had undergone bacteriological examination in the laboratories concerned were included. Isolates considered as contaminants were excluded.</p><p>Data collection, transport and storage of strains</p><p>Data concerning the patient (sex, age, department of origin) and the strain (date and type of sampling, bacterial species) were collected from the records in strict observance of confidentiality. The tubes containing the S. aureus isolates were transported in a closed cooler at room temperature to the laboratory.</p><p>Strain identification</p><p>Isolation of the strains in order to obtain pure isolates was performed by plating the samples on Mannitol Salt Agar (BioM&#233;rieux reference 610029). After macroscopic analysis of the colonies (appearance, texture, size), microscopic analysis was performed on Gram stained smears for confirmation of morphology (Gram positive cocci in clusters).</p><p>Using GP identification cards (BioMerieux reference 21342) the S. aureus strains were identified by the Vitek 2 compact™ automated system (BioMerieux).</p><p>The biochemical profile obtained was compared to those of the taxa contained in the database and the Vitek2™ performed a calculation of probability of correct identification automatically. Different confidence levels were associated.</p><p>Antibiotic sensitivity</p><p>The antibiotic susceptibility study was determined by the Vitek2 compact™ dilution method using AST-GP75 cards (BioM&#233;rieux reference 415670) and the results interpreted according to the recommendations of the Antibiogram Committee of the French Society of Microbiology (EUCAST/CASFM 2019) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref8">8</xref>].</p><p>Panel of tested molecules: Benzylpenicillin (BEZ), Oxacillin (OXA), Cefoxitin (CFX), Gentamycin (GEN), Ciprofloxacin (CIP), Levofloxacin (LVX), Moxifloxacin (MXP), Clindamycine (CLI), Erythromycin (ERY) Quinupristin/Dalfopristin (QDA), Vancomycin (VAN), Tetracycline (TET), Tigecycline (TIG), Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole (TSU), Linezolid (LNZ).</p><p>Interpretation of results</p><p>For the interpretation of the susceptibility tests, two clinical categories were retained based on the minimum inhibitory concentrations of the antibiotics tested:</p><p>‒ Susceptible (S) strains to antibiotics for which the probability of therapeutic success is high.</p><p>‒ Resistant strains (R) for which there is a high probability of therapeutic failure.</p><p>Cefoxitin was considered as a screening antibiotic for MRSA. Results were interpreted as positive (+) for MRSA (Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus) and negative (−) for MSSA (Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus).</p><p>Inducible resistance to Macrolides, Lincosamines and Streptogramines (MLS) was detected by the Muller Hinton agar diffusion method with Clindamycin disk in the presence of Erytromycin disk. The results were interpreted as positive (+) when induction was present and negative (−) when induction was absent.</p><p>Statistical analysis</p><p>Microsoft office Excel 2010 software was used to record the data and calculate the frequencies. The qualitative variables were represented in frequency and for the comparison of the variables we used the Chi-square test. The difference was considered statistically significant for a P-value less than 0.05.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>During the study period, 136 strains of S. aureus were selected from the laboratories of 7 hospitals in the city of Douala (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p>The strains were most frequently isolated at the Douala General Hospital (66.9%), regardless of the type of sample, and the majority was from the departments of Medicine, Surgery and Pediatrics (36.8%, 21.3% and 18.4% respectively) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Most of the strains came from blood cultures (55.1%) and pus (35.3%). The age range of the patients most represented was 30 to 40 years, with a male predominance (Sex ratio = 1.6) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p>Biochemical profile</p><p>The biochemical characteristics studied revealed 10 different phenotypic profiles ranging from 87% to 99% homology with the reference strain.</p><p>Antibiotic susceptibility profile</p><p>‒ Overall susceptibility</p><p>Benzylpenicillin, oxacillin and cefoxitin showed low activity among all strains with 3.2%, 17.4% and 21.3% respectively. Quinupristin/Dalfomipristin, Linezolid and Vancomycin however, showed better activity on all strains with 94.2%, 87.8%, and 84.2% respectively.</p><p>‒ According to the hospitals (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>)</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of Staphylococcus aureus strains</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"   rowspan="2"  >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >MRSA</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >MSSA</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Total</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >p-value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="7"  >Healthcare facility</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >General hospital</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="7"  >0.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Laquintinie</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Deido</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gyneco-Obs-Pediatric</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Military Hospital</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nylon-Brazzaville</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bonassama</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >Service</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Surgery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >0.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Outpatient</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gynecology</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >General Medicine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Neonatology</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pediatric</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Gender</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.53</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="9"  >Age groups (Year) Mean: 32.5 &#177; 23.5 Min: 1 day Max: 89 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="9"  >0.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 - 10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 - 20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 - 50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 - 60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >60 - 70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Type of sample</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Urine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >0.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Blood culture</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PUS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Genital</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >107 (78.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29 (21.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >136</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>MSSA: Methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus; MRSA: Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus.</p><p>The most active antibiotics at the Douala General Hospital were Quinupristin/Dalfomipristin, Tigecycline and Linezolid with 91.3%, 82.6%, and 85.9% susceptibility rates respectively.</p><p>At Laquintinie Hospital, Oxacilin, Benzylpenicillin and Cefoxitin had low activity on all strains with 0%, 3.3% and 10.3% respectively. In comparison, Quinupristin/Dalfomipristin, Vancomycin and Tigecycline were 100%, 96.7% and 90% active respectively.</p><p>In the other hospitals (Gyneco-Obstetric and Pediatric Hospital, Military Hospital, Deido, Nylon-Brazzaville and Bonassama District Hospitals), Quinupristin/Dalfomipristin, Linezolid and Vancomycin were the most active with rates of 97.1%, 85.9% and 80.5% respectively. Benzylpenicillin, Oxacilin and Cefoxitin were the most inactive with 1.4%, 16.9% and 20.0% respectively.</p><p>‒ According to gender</p><p>Quinupristin/Dalfomipristin and Tigecycline were the most active in women with 93.2% and 89.5% respectively. Linezolid and Vancomycin were slightly more active in males (88.8% and 84.3%). Benzylpenicillin, Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole and Oxacillin were the least active on both sexes.</p><p>‒ According to age</p><p>Quinupristin/Dalfomipristin, Tigecycline and Linezolid were 100% active in the 1 - 10 and 40 - 50 age groups. Over 70 years of age, Quinupristin remained 100% active, but the sensitivity decreased with Vancomycin and Tigecycline, with 57.1% and 40.0%.</p><p>‒ According to the type of specimens (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>)</p><p>Quinupristin/Dalfomipristin and Vancomycin had good activity on urine culture (100%). Quinupristin/Dalfomipristin also had good activity in blood cultures (97.1%) and Tigecycline in pus (97.8%).</p><p>Frequency of MRSA</p><p>MRSA predominated (78.7%) compared to MSSA regardless of collection site, type of specimen, age group or sex.</p><p>MRSA were more present at the General Hospital and Laquintinie Hospital compared to the other health facilities, but this result was not statistically significant (p-value &gt; 0.05); similarly the 30 to 40 year old age group was the most affected by MRSA (p-value &gt; 0.05). MRSA strains were predominantly isolated from blood cultures and pus that is 80.0% and 79.2% respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p>Comparison of antibiotic susceptibility patterns of MRSA and MSSA (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>)</p><p>Benzylpenicillin, Cefoxitin and Oxacilin were not active on MRSA strains. Erythromycin was less active on MRSA (38.2%), while Quinupristin/Dalfomipristin and Clindamycin showed better activity with sensitivity rates of 92.7% and 64.3% respectively. Tetracycline showed a low activity on MRSA strains with 38.3% contrary to Tigecycline that showed a good activity on strains with 83.9%. All the Fluroquinolone group antibiotics showed low activity on MRSA strains with 19.1% for Ciprofloxacin, 24.0% for Levofloxacin and 33.3% for Moxifloxacin. A good sensitivity of strains was observed for Vancomycin and Linezolid with rates of 80.2% and 85.8% respectively. A low sensitivity of strains was observed for the Trimethropine-Sulfamethoxazole combination (21.4%).</p><p>The difference in profile between MRSA and SASM was:</p><p>‒ Significant for Oxacilin, Cefoxitin, Gentamycin, and Ciprofloxacin (p-value &lt; 0.05).</p><p>‒ Not significant for Quinupristin/Dalfomipristin, Vancomycin, Tigecycline, and Linezolid (p-value &gt; 0.05).</p><p>Resistance phenotypes</p><p>Inducible Clindamycine resistance associated with MRSA were found in 26.7% of the strains isolated and constitutive MLSBs in 22.8%.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Nature of the sample</p><p>At the end of this study we observed that S. aureus strains were found mostly in blood culture samples with 11.8% from outpatients; Frikh et al. in 2015 had isolated S. aureus mostly in pus (29.1%) and in blood cultures (22.2%) over a longer period (8 years) on a sample of 1124 specimens of which the majority (77%) were of hospital origin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref7">7</xref>].</p><p>Biochemical profile</p><p>The analysis of the biochemical profiles showed an 87% - 99% homology with the reference strain, which reveals a good identification of staphylococci in the different health facilities, but also a large diversity that makes epidemiological monitoring difficult. This variability could be caused by mutations due to the selective pressure of antibiotics, thus favoring the presence of multiple clones [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref5">5</xref>].</p><p>Antibiotic susceptibility profile</p><p>Antibiotic susceptibility testing of strains isolated from patients and medical devices in hospitals is very important in directing the choice of treatment and reducing the selection risk exerted by antibiotics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref9">9</xref>].</p><p>The susceptibility profile of all S. aureus strains showed good activity of Quinupristin/Dalfopristin, Linezolid and Vancomycin regardless of origin, patient gender or age. This result is comparable to the results of Njoungang et al. in 2015 at the Military Hospital of Yaound&#233;; however, this good sensitivity towards these antibiotics could be explained by the limited use and unavailability in the local market of these molecules [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref10">10</xref>].</p><p>Low activity on the strains was observed for Benzylpenicillin (3.2%) and Oxacillin (17.4%); Koinan et al. in 2017 in Burkina Faso had observed also low sensitivity rates for these two molecules, i.e. 8% and 16% respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref11">11</xref>]. This decrease in sensitivity could be the consequence of a hyper production of penicillinase responsible for the hydrolysis of penicillin M and cephalosporins; the most likely cause of all these mechanisms would be the genetic plasticity of S. aureus and certainly the empirical or inappropriate consumption of these antibiotics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref13">13</xref>].</p><p>Frequency of MRSA</p><p>This study showed a high rate of MRSA previously observed by some other authors in Cameroon, in particular Njoungang et al. in 2015, Gonsu et al. in 2013 and Kengne et al. in 2019 who had found rates of 72%, 76% and 80.4% on strains isolated at the Central and Military Hospitals of Yaound&#233; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref15">15</xref>]. The presence of MRSA is often associated with resistance to many antibiotics as noted by Kengne et al. with Vancomycin (79.7%), Tobramycin (70.3%), Doxycycline (68%) and Erythromycin (55.7%); therefore, there is a need to improve surveillance systems in order to reduce the spread of these multi-resistant bacteria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref15">15</xref>]. The frequencies vary from one country to another but are generally high: 16% in Senegal and Niger, 20% to 47% in Nigeria, 36% in Benin and 35.7% in Togo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref16">16</xref>]. In Ivory Coast, a study conducted in three referral hospitals reported a rate of 39%, reflecting the extent of the MRSA problem in West Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref9">9</xref>].</p><p>The spread of resistant strains in our environment could be impacted by a number of factors among which the lack of monitoring of S. aureus infections in hospitals and uncontrolled over prescription of antibiotics; this situation requires the implementation of a policy to control the clonal diffusion of strains [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref5">5</xref>].</p><p>The identification of MRSA in hospitalized and outpatients suggests the presence of these strains in the community and in hospitals of the city of Douala with frequencies different from those reported by Atshan et al. in 2016 in Mauritania and Njoungang et al. in 2015 in the city of Yaound&#233; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref10">10</xref>]. Actually, the frequency of MRSA varies according to activity, nature of infections, type of prophylaxis and antibiotic therapy and by country [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref17">17</xref>]. However, other factors such as presence of epidemic strains, period of the study, transfer of patients between different departments, hospitalizations in intensive care units could determine this frequency [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref3">3</xref>].</p><p>Resistance to Methicillin is often associated with a decrease in the sensitivity of S. aureus to other families of antibiotics such as the aminoglycosides represented by gentamicin; in Turkey in 2014 the research of Yildiz et al. had shown high rates of resistance to gentamicin (81.0%), erythromycin (63%) and clindamycin (50%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref18">18</xref>].</p><p>The family of fluroquinolones represented by 3 molecules (Ciprofloxacin, Levofloxacin, Moxifloxacin) also showed a very low activity against MRSA strains. These results are similar to those of Frikh et al. in Morocco who found a high resistance rate of 68.3% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref7">7</xref>].</p><p>Decreased sensitivity to macrolides was observed for Erythromycin, i.e. 38.2%; Abbas et al. in 2015 found a rate of resistance to this antibiotic of 40.2% in S. aureus strains isolated in several bacteriological samples [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref19">19</xref>].</p><p>Although Vancomycin has good activity on MRSA strains, 21 strains were resistant. Kengne et al. also observed this resistance at the Central Hospital of Yaound&#233; with a high rate of 79.7% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref15">15</xref>]. Vancomycin-resistant (VRSA) and intermediate-resistant (VISA) strains of S. aureus have been described since 1997 and the next few years in Japan and other Asian countries, the United States and Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref20">20</xref>]. This reflects a metabolic reorganization of the peptidoglycan linked to mutations in several genes or in the expression of these genes that can prevent the accessibility of Vancomycin to its target [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref19">19</xref>]. The decreased susceptibility of S. aureus to Vancomycin is a current problem as this molecule has been a drug of choice for the treatment of MRSA infections [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref21">21</xref>].</p><p>Associated risk factors</p><p>The predominance of S. aureus strains has been observed in male patients with a rate of 64%; Frikh et al. observed the same tendency, however, the difference is not always statistically significant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref7">7</xref>].</p><p>High-risk factors for staphylococcal infections are hospitalization, prolonged stay in healthcare facilities, chronic renal failure, HIV infection, diabetes, and young age (newborn and elderly) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref22">22</xref>]. We observed the highest frequencies in the age groups 0 to 1 year and 30 to 40 years.</p><p>Resistance phenotypes</p><p>The study of resistance to Clindamycin revealed 26.7% of strains with inducible MLSb and 22.8% of constitutive MLSb. These results are similar to those of Rebiahi et al. in 2011 and Ouchenane et al. in 2011 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref24">24</xref>]. The frequency of these phenotypes varies according to geographical region and proves that MRSA expresses the more advanced macrolide resistances usually related to methylase production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119343-ref25">25</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The MRSA strains show a decreased sensitivity towards several families of antibiotics. In general, Linezolid, Quinupristin and Vancomycin maintain a good activity on all strains. However, this sensitivity is not the same in all hospitals in the city of Douala. The progression of these strains is a phenomenon to be monitored because the transmission of MRSA is not controlled. The implementation of new strategies to control multi-resistant strains of S. aureus is of major importance in order to limit their spread within hospitals.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We express our gratitude to the staff of all the Laboratories concerned for their support and cooperation during this study.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Availability of Data</title><p>All data supporting these findings can be found in the bacteriological Unit of the Laboratory of Clinical Biology of the DGH.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Authors’ Contributions</title><p>COE and DA coordinated the study, COE, JPNM and YS drafted the manuscript, YS, ERM, GPN, NH and GN collected data and participate in its design, and IPNM, NH and ERM performed the statistical analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Ethics</title><p>The study was conducted in accordance with ethics directives related to research in Cameroon. We obtained the research authorizations of the Directors of the concerned hospitals, ethical clearance from the Institutional Ethics Committee of Research for Human Health of the University of Douala, and the approval of the General Hospital of Douala institutional review board.</p></sec><sec id="s10"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s11"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Mefo’o, J.P.N., Sabekob, Y., Ngondi, G.D., Mengue, E.R., Malabo, E.N., Handa, N., Ngaba, G.P., Adiogo, D. and Ebongue, C.O. (2022) Antibiotics Susceptibility Profile of Staphylococcus aureus Clinical Isolates Collected in Hospitals in the City of Douala (Cameroon). Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 10, 188-200. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2022.108016</p></sec><sec id="s12"><title>Abbreviation</title><p>DGH: Douala General Hospital</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.119343-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Koinam, F.R., Guira, F., Somda, N.S., Yaméogo, A., Bonkoungou, I.J., Traoré, Y. and Savadogo, A. (2017) Profile of Sensitivity and Resistance to Antibiotics of Staphylococcus aureus Strains Isolated from Patients Fluids in Medical Biology Department of National Public Health Laboratory of Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 9, 553-566. https://doi.org/10.4314/jfas.v9i1.32</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119343-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dumitrescu, O., Dauwalder, O., Boisset, S., Reverdy, M.E., Tristan, A. and Vandenesch, F. (2010) Staphylococcus aureus Resistance to Antibiotics: Key Points in 2010. Medecine Sciences, 26, 943-949. https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/20102611943</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119343-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bassoum</surname><given-names> O. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2021</year>)<article-title>Evaluation des indicateurs de prescription à travers les ordonnances recues dans les officines de pharmacie implantées dans la ville de Thiès, Sénégal</article-title><source> Revue Africaine et Malgache de Recherche Scientifique/Sciences de la Santé</source><volume> 1</volume>,<fpage> 116</fpage>-<lpage>127</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119343-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gonsu, K.H., Ndongo, G.A., Adiogo, D., Toukam, M., Ndze, V.N., Kechia, A.F. and Nkam, M. (2013) Carriage of Multi-Drug Resistant Bacteria among Medical Staff of the Yaounda&amp;copy; University Teaching Hospital, Cameroon. African Journal of Bacteriology Research, 5, 62-67. https://doi.org/10.5897/JBR12.028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119343-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kengne, M., Fotsing, O., Ndomgue, T. and Nwobegahay, J.M. (2019) Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of Staphylococcus aureus Strains Isolated at the Yaounde Central Hospital, Cameroon: A Retro Prospective Study. Pan African Medical Journal, 32, Article No. 103. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2019.32.103.15743</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119343-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Breurec, S., Zriouil, S.B., Fall, C., Boisier, P., Brisse, S., Djibo, S., et al. (2011) Epidemiology of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Lineages in Five Major African Towns: Emergence and Spread of Atypical Clones. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 17, 160-165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03219.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119343-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Trouillet, J.L. and Chastre, J. (2013) Traitement des infections sévères à Staphylococcus aureus méticilline résistant en réanimation. Quelle antibiothérapie proposer en 2013? Journal des Anti-infectieux, 15, 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antinf.2013.04.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119343-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yildiz, O., Coban, A.Y., Sener, A.G., Coskuner, S.A., Bayramoglu, G., Guducuoglu, H., et al. (2014) Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Resistance Mechanisms of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from 12 Hospitals in Turkey. Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, 13, Article No. 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-014-0044-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119343-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abbas, A., Srivastava, P. and Nirwan, P.S. (2015) Prevalence of MLSB Resistance and Observation of erm A &amp; erm C Genes at a Tertiary Care Hospital. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research, 9, DC08-DC10. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/13584.6112</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119343-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Leibler, J.H., León, C., Cardoso, L.J., Morris, J.C., Miller, N.S., Nguyen, D.D. and Gaeta, J.M. (2017) Prevalence and Risk Factors for MRSA Nasal Colonization among Persons Experiencing Homelessness in Boston, MA. Journal of Medical Microbiology, 66, 1183-1188. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.000552</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119343-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Leclercq, R. and Cattoir, V. (2012) Bactéries à Gram positif et glycopeptides. Revue Francophone des Laboratoires, 2012, 41-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1773-035X(12)71675-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119343-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xu, Y., Wang, B., Zhao, H., Wang, X., Rao, L., Ai, W., et al. (2021) In Vitro Activity of Vancomycin, Teicoplanin, Linezolid and Daptomycin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Collected from Chinese Hospitals in 2018-2020. Infection and Drug Resistance, 14, 5449-5456. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S340623</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119343-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chavadi, M., Narasanna, R., Chavan, A. and Oli, A.K. (2018) Prevalence of Methicillin Resistant and Virulence Determinants in Clinical Isolates of. The Open Infectious Diseases Journal, 10, 108-115. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874279301810010108</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119343-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ouchenane, Z., Smati, F., Rolain, J.M. and Raoult, D. (2011) Molecular Characterization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates in Algeria. Pathologie Biologie, 59, e129-e132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patbio.2009.11.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119343-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rebiahi, S.A., Abdelouahid, D.E., Rahmoun, M., Abdelali, S. and Azzaoui, H. (2011) Emergence of Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Identified in the Tlemcen University Hospital (North-West Algeria). Médecine et maladies infectieuses, 41, 646-651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medmal.2011.09.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119343-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Njoungang, L.L., Nwobegahay, J.M., Ayangma, C.R., Njukeng, A.P., Kengne, M., Abeng, E.M.O., et al. (2015) Prevalence and Antibiotic Resistance Patterns of Strains of Staphylococcus aureus Isolated at the Yaounde Military Hospital, Cameroon. Microbiology Research International, 3, 56-63.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119343-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Spagnolo, A.M., Orlando, P., Panatto, D., Amicizia, D., Perdelli, F. and Cristina, M.L. (2014) Staphylococcus aureus with Reduced Susceptibility to Vancomycin in Healthcare Settings. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene, 55, 137-144.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119343-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Société Francaise de Microbiologie (2019) Comité de L’antibiogramme de la Société Francaise de Microbiologie. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, Strandvagen.https://www.sfm-microbiologie.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/CASFM2019_V1.0.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119343-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Frikh, M., Lemouer, A. and Belfquih, B. (2016) Profils de sensibilité des isolats de Staphylococcus aureus Etude rétrospective sur Huit ans dans un hopital d’instruction. Journal Marocain des Sciences Médicales, 20, 5-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119343-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">World Health Organization (2021) Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS) Report: 2021. World Health Organization, Geneva.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119343-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Atshan, S.S., Nor Shamsudin, M., Lung, L.T.T., Sekawi, Z., Pei Pei, C., Karunanidhi, A., et al. (2013) Genotypically Different Clones of Staphylococcus aureus Are Diverse in the Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns and Biofilm Formations. BioMed Research International, 2013, Article ID: 515712. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/515712</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119343-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Peyclit, L., Chanteloup, A., Hadjadj, L. and Rolain, J.M. (2018) Role of Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire Méditerranée Infection in the Surveillance of Resistance to Antibiotics and Training of Students in the Mediterranean Basin and in African Countries. New Microbes and New Infections, 26, S52-S64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmni.2018.06.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119343-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fishovitz, J., Hermoso, J.A., Chang, M. and Mobashery, S. (2014) Penicillin-Binding Protein 2a of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. IUBMB Life, 66, 572-577. https://doi.org/10.1002/iub.1289</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119343-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kakupa, D.K., Muenze, P.K., Byl, B. and Wilmet, M.D. (2016) Etude de la prévalence des infections nosocomiales et des facteurs associes dans les deux hopitaux universitaires de Lubumbashi, République Démocratique du Congo: Cas des Cliniques Universitaires de Lubumbashi et l’Hopital Janson Sendwe. The Pan African Medical Journal, 24, Article No. 275. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2016.24.275.7626</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119343-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mitevska, E., Wong, B., Surewaard, B.G. and Jenne, C.N. (2021) The Prevalence, Risk, and Management of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection in Diverse Populations across Canada: A Systematic Review. Pathogens, 10, Article No. 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10040393</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>