<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJU</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Urology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-5440</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oju.2022.125030</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJU-117447</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Epidemiological and Clinical Aspects of Bladder Tumours at the Nianankoro Fomba Hospital in Segou in the Urology Department
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sory</surname><given-names>Ibrahim Kone</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Honoré</surname><given-names>Jean Gabriel Berthe</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Aly</surname><given-names>Douro Tembely</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zanafon</surname><given-names>Ouattara</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mamadou</surname><given-names>Lamine Diakite</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Urology, CHU Gabriel TOURE, Bamako, Mali</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Urology, CHU Point G, Bamako, Mali</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Urology Department, Nianankoro Fomba Hospital, Ségou, Mali</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>10</day><month>05</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>294</fpage><lpage>303</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>1,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>30,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Objectives: To study the epidemiological, diagnostic and prognostic aspects of bladder tumours in Segou Hospital. 
  Patients and Methods: We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study of bladder tumours over the period from 1 April 2012 to 1 April 2017, in the urology department of the Nianankoro Fomba Hospital in Segou. The first three years were used for patient recruitment, and the last two years for follow-up of the patients in the series. 
  Results: Over a period of three years, we collected 165 cases of bladder tumours hospitalised out of 1308 hospitalisations from 7007 consultations, 
  <em>i.e.</em> 12.6% of hospitalisations and 2.3% of consultations. The sex ratio was 1.2 in favour of men. A history of treated bilharzia was reported in 78.8% of cases and untreated bilharzia in 9.1% of cases. Haematuria was the most common reason for consultation. The majority of our patients were at stage T4 and T3 at the time of diagnosis, 
  <em>i.e.</em> 53.3% and 44.3% respectively. Most patients consulted within 13 to 24 months after the first sign, 
  <em>i.e.</em> 44.8%. 
  Conclusion: The prognosis is still clouded by the delay in management. All the patients diagnosed had a bladder tumour infiltrating the muscle.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Bladder Tumour</kwd><kwd> Bladder Cancer</kwd><kwd> Epidemiological and Clinical Aspects</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Bladder tumours are a major public health problem despite technical and technological advances. A bladder tumour is diagnosed or treated in 2.7 million people worldwide each year and the majority of cases occur after the age of 60 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117447-ref1">1</xref>]. In France, this disease, with an estimated 13,074 new cases and 5335 deaths in 2018, 80% of which were in men, ranks 4th<sup>e</sup> in incidence and 7th<sup>e</sup> in deaths for all cancers combined (Institut de Veille Sanitaire (In, Vs, 2018)) and is the second most common cancer after prostate cancer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117447-ref2">2</xref>]. In developed countries, the main risk factor is tobacco intoxication [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117447-ref3">3</xref>], but in our context, urinary bilharziasis linked to Schistosoma haematobium, the most widespread with a high prevalence in the Office du Niger of 62.8% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117447-ref4">4</xref>], is a proven risk factor for bladder tumours. It predisposes to squamous cell bladder tumour. This is the most common case in Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117447-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117447-ref5">5</xref>].</p><p>Diagnosis remains late in our country. Almost all patients are in stages T3 and T4, at the time of diagnosis 55% in stage T3 and 25% in stage T4 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117447-ref6">6</xref>].</p><p>According to the cancer registry in Mali (2010), bladder tumour is the third<sup>e</sup> most common cancer in men, the fifth<sup>e</sup> most common in women and the fifth<sup>e</sup> most common cancer in both sexes combined.</p><p>Bladder tumour is the leading cause of cancer mortality in the urology department of the Point G University Hospital.</p><p>The bilharzia endemic in the Segou region and especially in the Office du Niger zone justified our study of bladder tumours in a local hospital centre, knowing the role of bilharzia in the genesis of this pathology.</p><p>Thus, the general objective of this study was to study the socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of patients diagnosed with bladder tumours at the Nianankoro Fomba Hospital. The specific objectives were to:</p><p>&#183; Identify history and risk factors in patients with bladder cancer;</p><p>&#183; Assess the stage of development at the time of diagnosis;</p><p>&#183; Study the survival of patients admitted with bladder cancer.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Patients and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Type of Study, Period and Location</title><p>This was a descriptive cross-sectional study of bladder tumours at the Nianankoro Fomba Hospital over a period of 5 years (from 1<sup>er</sup> April 2012 to 1<sup>er</sup> April 2017), i.e. 3 years for patient recruitment and 2 years for follow-up of each patient.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Inclusion Criteria</title><p>The study included patients hospitalised during the study period, for whom the diagnosis of bladder tumour was retained on clinical and para-clinical examination, confirmed or not by histological examination.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Data Collection and Analysis</title><p>The data collection was based on the hospitalization register, hospital records, consultation register, and surgical protocol register. The following parameters were studied: -age -sex -ethnicity -occupation -residence in relation to endemic areas -clinical and non-clinical parameters. Data entry and analysis were done with epi-info 3.5.1 version 6. Fr World Microsoft software.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>Over a period of three years, we collected 165 cases of bladder tumours hospitalised out of 1308 hospitalisations from 7007 consultations, i.e. 12.6% of hospitalisations (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) and 2.3% of consultations. The sex ratio was 1.2 in favour of men (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>The 30 - 45 age group was the most represented with 31.5% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Housewives and farmers were the most represented with 46% and 36.4% respectively because of activities related to risk factors (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). A history of treated bilharzia was reported in 78.8% of cases and untreated bilharzia in 9.1% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>).</p><p>Haematuria was the most common reason for consultation 96.4% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>).</p><p>The majority of our patients were in stage T4 and T3 at the time of diagnosis, 53.3% and 44.3% respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>). Most patients consulted within 13 to 24 months after the first sign, 44.8%. The survival of patients exceeded 36 months in only 5 cases (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>The origin of the patients was mainly the areas covered by the rice-growing and market gardening activities of the Office du Niger, with 40.6% coming from Niono and 32.2% from Macina, this being related to the bilharzia endemic (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Frequency of bladder tumours among other inpatient conditions during the 3-year period</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pathologies</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Benign prostatic hyperplasia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >446</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.5%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bladder tumour</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.6%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hernia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >133</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.3%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Renal lithiasis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bladder lithiasis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hydrocele</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.9%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Urogenital infection</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gynephrosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Narrowing of the urethra</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cystocele</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Prostate cancer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gangrene in the stock market</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Renal failure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pelvic ureteral stenosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Other</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >171</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.2%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1308</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Age distribution</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Age group</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 - 30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 - 45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >46 - 60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >61 - 75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >More than 75 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients according to socio-professional activities</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Profession</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cultivator</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Housekeeper</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Worker</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trader</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Driver</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Breeder</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fisherman</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Teacher</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Other</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients according to urological history</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Past history</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequencies</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentages</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Bilharzia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Processed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130/165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Untreated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15/165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Recurrent urinary tract infections</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25/165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Prostatic hypertrophy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20/165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Treated bladder lithiasis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3/165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients by reason for consultation</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Reason for consultation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hematuria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >159/165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dysuria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86/165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Suprapubic pain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62/165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pollakiuria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78/165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lumbar pain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30/165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Burning of the bladder</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42/165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acute urine retention</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12/165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hypogastric mass</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40/165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Urine leakage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2/165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients according to the stage of development at the clinic</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Progressive stage</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Frequency</title><p>Over a period of three years, we recorded 165 cases of bladder tumours out of 1308 hospitalisations from 7007 consultations at NIANANKORO FOMBA hospital, i.e. 12.6% of hospitalisations and 2.3% of consultations. This frequency, which was estimated at 12.6% of admissions, is higher than those reported by OUATTARA in Benin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117447-ref7">7</xref>] and Odz&#233;b&#233; in Congo Brazzaville [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117447-ref8">8</xref>], which were respectively 3.4% and 4.78%.</p><p>This can be explained by the high prevalence of bilharzia in our study area, which is the Office du Niger. Bilharzia is a proven risk factor for bladder tumours.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Socio-Demographic Study</title><sec id="s4_2_1"><title>4.2.1. Sex</title><p>In our study the sex ratio was 1.2, which is identical to that of B. Diao [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117447-ref9">9</xref>] in Senegal who reported a sex ratio of 1.25. However, Avakoudjo in Benin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117447-ref10">10</xref>] found a sex ratio of 3/1. This can be explained by the high involvement of men in professional activities exposing them to the main risk factor of bilharzia; also some men were smokers</p></sec><sec id="s4_2_2"><title>4.2.2. Ethnicity</title><p>The Bambaras were the most represented in our study with 41.2%, followed by the Bozos with 19.4% and the Peulhs with 12.1%.</p><p>These ethnic groups are involved in agriculture, particularly rice growing, market gardening, fishing, livestock breeding and the continuous search for pasture along the waterways. Thus these ethnic groups remain exposed to the main risk factor of bilharzia in the study area.</p><p>This result is similar to that of Tangara [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117447-ref11">11</xref>] where Bambara were the most represented.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2_3"><title>4.2.3. Age</title><p>In our study, the 31 - 45 age group is the most represented with 31.5%. The average age of our patients, estimated at 38 years, is lower but close to that of B. Diao in Senegal, which is 45.5 years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117447-ref9">9</xref>], and of OUATTARA in Benin, which is 49.7 years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117447-ref7">7</xref>]. Our result is much lower than the average age reported in western countries such as France where Irani et al. reported an average age of 69 years for men and 71 years for women [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117447-ref12">12</xref>]. J. Palou reported an average age of 65 years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117447-ref13">13</xref>].</p><p>This can be explained by the fact that Schistosomiasis is endemic in the study area and has affected most patients in childhood or adolescence. In contrast, in Western or developed countries the risk factors are smoking and occupational exposure.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. The Profession</title><p>Housewives and farmers were the most represented in our study with 46% and 36.4% respectively.</p><p>These results are in agreement with those of other studies of bladder tumours [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117447-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117447-ref14">14</xref>].</p>Residence<p>Niono and Macina were the most common residences with 40.6% and 32.2% respectively, in relation to the main coverage area of the Office du Niger.</p><p>S&#233;gou is the third most common residence reported with 9.1%, S&#233;gou being the area with the highest concentration of the region's population, professional exposure activities, it is also the town where the reception and treatment centre is located.</p></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. Clinical Study</title>The Delay of Consultation<p>In our series 44.8% of the patients consulted between 13 and 24 months; 34.5% of the patients consulted between 7 and 12 months. Only 12.2% of the patients consulted between 0 and 6 months. This shows the delay in consultation of the patients in our study.</p><p>These results are comparable to those of other authors such as Benchakroun et al. who found that the average delay in consultation was 10 months [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117447-ref15">15</xref>]. This neglect is common as bladder tumours often occur in a disadvantaged population and access to care is not always easy.</p></sec><sec id="s4_5"><title>4.5. The Reason for Consultation</title><p>The most common reason for consultation in our study was haematuria. It was present in 96.4% of cases. Haematuria was also the main reason for consultation in the study by Demb&#233;l&#233; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117447-ref5">5</xref>] with 73.9% for total haematuria and 23.9 for terminal haematuria. B Diao reported haematuria in 88% of cases in his series in Senegal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117447-ref9">9</xref>].</p><p>The signs associated with this haematuria were dysuria, pollakiuria and suprapubic pain in 52.1%, 47.3% and 37.6% respectively.</p><p>This result is close to those of other authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117447-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117447-ref14">14</xref>].</p><p>The finding of a hypogastric mass justified consultation in 24.2%; this testifies to the advanced stage of these tumours and the delay in consultation of the patients in our study.</p></sec><sec id="s4_6"><title>4.6. Urological History</title><p>Treated bilharzia was reported in 78.8%, untreated bilharzia in 9.1%.</p><p>Bilharzia was the main history found in our study patients.</p></sec><sec id="s4_7"><title>4.7. Inspection</title><p>Pallor was found in 61.8% of patients in our study.</p><p>This result is superior to that of A Elmahfoudi in Morocco who found a discoloration of the conjunctiva in 36% of cases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117447-ref16">16</xref>]. This difference can be explained by the long delay in consultation while haematuria exposes to blood spoliation. Weight loss was the 2nd<sup>e</sup> sign of inspection with 44.2% contrary to the study conducted by Demb&#233;l&#233; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117447-ref5">5</xref>] where it was the first sign of inspection with 54.3%. This result reflects the advanced stage of bladder tumours at the time of diagnosis. This is in agreement with the results of all local authors.</p></sec><sec id="s4_8"><title>4.8. Abdominal Palpation and Pelvic Touch</title><p>In our study, induration of the bladder floor was found in 62.4% of cases. Tangara found 84% infiltration of the bladder floor.</p><p>In our study, pelvic shielding was found in 36.4% of patients. This result is superior to that of Demb&#233;l&#233; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117447-ref6">6</xref>] who found pelvic shielding in 23.9% of patients.</p><p>A palpable suprapubic mass was found in 34.5% of patients in our study. Also seven (7) cases of vesico-vaginal fistula and three (3) cases of neoplastic vesico-rectal fistula were found in our study. All this shows that there is a significant delay in consultation and management, leading to the recruitment of patients at an already advanced stage.</p></sec><sec id="s4_9"><title>4.9. Para-Clinical Study</title><sec id="s4_9_1"><title>4.9.1. Imaging</title><p>Ultrasound was performed in all patients in our study either for diagnosis or for extension or for both. For diagnosis, ultrasound was performed on all our patients, i.e. 100% Demb&#233;l&#233; reported 84.8% of cases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117447-ref6">6</xref>].</p><p>This ultrasound noted an absence of impact on the upper urinary tract in 59.4% of cases. Benchakroun et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117447-ref15">15</xref>] found a ureterohydronephrosis, i.e. no impact on the upper urinary tract in 79% of cases, which is higher than in our series. Four (4) cases of hepatic metastases (2.4%) were reported.</p><p>Urethrocystoscopy was performed in four (4) cases, while it confirmed the presence of a bladder mass in 71.4% of cases in the study by Demb&#233;l&#233; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117447-ref6">6</xref>] and in 70% of cases in the study by Tangara [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117447-ref11">11</xref>]. This is explained by the non-availability of uretrocystoscopy in our facility during the study period.</p><p>In our study:</p><p>IVU was performed in 27 cases, i.e. 16.36%. This rate is much lower than that of Lougue [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117447-ref17">17</xref>] who reported 100%, however U-I-V whenever performed was suggestive of tumour, often with hydronephrosis.</p><p>This sensitivity of V.I.U. was also recognised in the Lougue series [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117447-ref17">17</xref>] where 100% of bladder tumours were evoked by IVU.</p><p>Chest X-rays were performed in 24 cases and revealed lung metastases in four (4) cases.</p><p>CT scans were performed elsewhere in six (6) patients in our series and revealed one (1) case of metastases.</p><p>These results do not contradict those of some authors in the literature who state that metastases are rare in bladder tumours.</p><p>The performance of CT in our study patients was influenced by the lack of financial means and the non-availability of this examination in the vicinity.</p></sec><sec id="s4_9_2"><title>4.9.2. Stage of Development</title><p>In our series, the majority of our patients were in stage T4 and T3 at the time of diagnosis, i.e. 53.3% and 44.3% respectively.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4_10"><title>4.10. Survival</title><p>In our study</p><p>Patient survival exceeded 36 months in only 5 (five) cases.</p><p>The largest number of patients had a survival of 25 - 30 months or 33.94%. 29.7% of the patients survived for 19 - 24 months, death of the patient during the first <sup>&#232;re</sup>year after diagnosis was observed in 24 cases or 14.5%.</p><p>Demb&#233;l&#233; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117447-ref5">5</xref>] reported that six (6) out of 26 patients died within one year of diagnosis, or 23.07%.</p><p>Tangara [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117447-ref11">11</xref>] observed 66% of deaths within one year of diagnosis.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Bladder tumours remain a major public health problem in the Segou region because of the high frequency of this pathology and the problems associated with its management. Bilharzia is the most common risk factor. The diagnosis is late and all the patients in our series had a bladder tumour infiltrating the muscle, so the prognosis remains poor for these patients.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Kone, S.I., Berthe, H.J.G., Tembely, A.D., Ouattara, Z. and Diakite, M.L. (2022) Epidemiological and Clinical Aspects of Bladder Tumours at the Nianankoro Fomba Hospital in Segou in the Urology Department. Open Journal of Urology, 12, 294-303. https://doi.org/10.4236/oju.2022.125030</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.117447-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Siegel, R.L., Miller, K.D. and Jemal, A. (2020) Cancer Statistics, 2020. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 70, 7-30. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21590</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117447-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Roupret, M., Pignot, G., Masson-Lecomte, A., Compérat, E., Audenet, F., Roumiguié, M., Houédé, N., Larré, S., Brunelle, S., Xylinas, E., Neuzillet, Y. and Méjean, A. (2018) French Recommendations of the AFU Cancer Committee-Update 2018-2020: Bladder Tumoursprogurol, Supplement 1, 28, R48.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117447-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Richters, A., Aben, K.K.H. and Kiemeney, L.A.L.M. (2019) The Global Burden of Urinary Bladder Cancer: An Update. World Journal of Urology, 38, 1895-1904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02984-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117447-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sangho, H., Dabo, A., Sangho, O., Diawara, A. and Doumbo, O. (2005) Prevalence and Perception of Schistosomiasis in Irrigated Rice-Growing Areas in Mali. Mali Médical, Tome XX N 3.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117447-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Traore, M. (1994) A Study of the Epidemiology of Schistosomiasis in Mali toward a Rationally Based National Program. PHD Thesis, Faculty of Medicine, University of London, London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117447-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dembélé, A. (2012) The Management of Bladder Tumours in the Urology Department of the Gabriel Touré University Hospital. Medical Thesis Bamako.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117447-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ouattara, A., Hodonou, R. and Avakoudjo, J. (2012) Epidemiology of Urological Cancers at the Hubert Koutoukou Maga National University Hospital. Progress in Urology, 22, 261-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2011.12.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117447-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Odzébé, A.W.S., Bouya, P.A., Kouambon, J.B.N. and Kat, M.H.E. (2011) Tumours of the Bladder: Epidemiological and Therapeutic Aspects in Brazzaville. African Journal of Cancer, 3, 36-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12558-010-0135-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117447-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diao, B., Amath, F., Fall, B., Fall, P.A., Diémé, M.J., Steevy, N.N., Ndiaye, A.K. and Ba, M. (2008) Bladder Cancer in Senegal: Epidemiological, Clinical and Histological Particularities. Progress in Urology, 18, 445-448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2008.04.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117447-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Avakoudjo, J.D.G., Hannasso, P.P., Gouissi, S.A.G., AGounkpe, M.M., Natchagande, G., Dandjelessa, O. and Lossitode, F. (2015) Bladder Tumour Epidemiological and Diagnostic Aspects at the National Hospital and University Centre of Cotonou (Rep. of Benin). Journal de la société de Biologie clinique du Benin, 22, 77-80.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117447-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tangara, S. (2008) Study of Bladder Tumours in the Urology Department of the CHU Gabriel Touré. Thesis of Medicine, Bamako, No. 143, p. 84.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117447-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Iranj, B.S., Davin, J.L., et al. (2008) Superstring Bladder Tumours No Longer Exist. Progrès en Urologie, 18, 204-205.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117447-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Palou, J. and Sylvester, R.J. (2012) Female Gender and Carcinoma in Situ in the Prostatic Urethra Are Prognostic Factors for Recurrence, Progression, and Disease-Specific Mortality in T1G3 Bladder Cancer Patients Treated with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin. European Urology, 62, 118-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.029</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117447-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zongo</surname><given-names> B. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2002</year>)<article-title>Bilharzia Bladder Cancer: A Case Report of 9 Patients in Burkina Faso</article-title><source> Bulletin de la Societe de Pathologie Exotique</source><volume> 95</volume>,<fpage> 244</fpage>-<lpage>247</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117447-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Benchakroun, A., El AlJ, H.A., EL Sayegh, H., Lachkar, A., Nouini, Y., Benslimane, L., Belahnech, Z. and Falk, M. (2003) Superficial Bladder Tumours pT1G3: About 24 Cases. Annals of Urology, 37, 199-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4401(03)00069-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117447-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elmahfoudi, A. and Sarf, I. (2013) Epidemiological Profile of Vesicular Tumours in the Marrakech Region.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117447-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lougué-Sorgho</surname><given-names> Cisse</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> L.C.</surname><given-names> Kagone</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> R.M.</surname><given-names> Bamouni</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Y.A. and Sanou</surname><given-names> A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2002</year>)<article-title>Radiography and Ultrasound in the Management of Bladder Tumours about 71 Cases at the Yalgado Ouedraogo National Hospital (Burkina Faso)</article-title><source> Bulletin de la Societe de Pathologie Exotique</source><volume> 95</volume>,<fpage> 244</fpage>-<lpage>247</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>