<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JAMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4352</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jamp.2022.103047</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JAMP-115699</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  A Dirichlet Inhomogenous Boundary Value Problem for 1D Nonlinear Schr&amp;#246;dinger Equation
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Charles</surname><given-names>Bu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Department of Mathematics, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA, USA</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>02</day><month>03</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>656</fpage><lpage>660</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>9,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>5,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>8,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Pure initial value problems for important nonlinear evolution equations such as nonlinear Schr
  &amp;#246;dinger equation (NLS) and the Ginzburg-Landau equation (GL) have been extensively studied. However, many applications in physics lead to mathematical models where boundary data is inhomogeneous, e.g. in radio frequency wave experiments. In this paper, we investigate the mixed initial-boundary condition problem for the nonlinear Schr
  &amp;#246;dinger equation 
  <em>iu<sub>t</sub></em> = 
  <em>u<sub>xx</sub></em> – 
  <em>g</em>|
  <em>u</em>|
  <sup><em>p</em>-1</sup>
  <em>u</em>, 
  <em>g</em> 
  &amp;#8712; 
  <em>R</em>, 
  <em>p</em> &gt; 3 on a semi-infinite strip. The equation satisfies an initial condition and Dirichlet boundary conditions. We utilize semi-group theory to prove existence and uniqueness theorem of a strong local solution.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Nonlinear Schr&amp;#246;dinger Equation</kwd><kwd> Inhomogeneous Boundary Condition</kwd><kwd> Local Existence and Uniqueness</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Inhomogenous boundary value problems often occur when an external force is applied to the time evolution of systems governed by nonlinear partial differential equations. Such forcing is often accomplished by imposing a boundary condition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.115699-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.115699-ref2">2</xref>] . In ionospheric modification experiments, one directs a radio frequency wave at the ionosphere. At the reflection point of the wave, a sufficient level of electron plasma waves is excited to make the nonlinear behavior important [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.115699-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.115699-ref4">4</xref>] . This is described by the nonlinear Schr&#246;dinger equation with the cubic nonlinear term on a semi-infinite line.</p><p>i u t = u x x + k | u | 2 u (1.1)</p><p>( x , t ) ∈ R + &#215; R +</p><p>u ( x , 0 ) = h ( x ) , u ( 0 , t ) = g ( t )</p><p>where k ∈ R + and h ( x ) , g ( t ) satisfy the necessary compatibility conditions h ( 0 ) = g ( 0 ) with appropriate smoothness that h ∈ H 2 [ 0, ∞ ) , g ∈ C 1 [ 0, ∞ ) . For more references about forced nonlinear systems such as NLS and KdV, see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.115699-ref5">5</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.115699-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>Although solutions to the free NLS satisfy various conservation laws, it is no longer the case when inhomogenous boundary condition is imposed. Consequently, Hamiltonian properties are lost and the nice Schr&#246;dinger group on ( − ∞ , ∞ ) determined by i q t = q x x is not available.</p><p>For (1.1) with either Dirichlet or Robin inhomogenous boundary condition, global existence and well-posedness for the forced NLS were proved in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.115699-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.115699-ref13">13</xref>] .</p><p>For the following 1D nonlinear Schr&#246;dinger equation of a general nonlinearity ( g &gt; 0 , p &gt; 3 )</p><p>i u t = u x x − g | u | p − 1 u ,     ( x , t ) ∈ R + &#215; R + (1.2)</p><p>u ( x ,0 ) = h ( x )</p><p>with either Dirichlet or Robin Inhomogenous boundary conditions, global existence and well-posedness of a classical solution were proved in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.115699-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>For the following NLS in n-dimensions with inhomogenous Dirichlet boundary data where the nonlinear term contributes to a positive term to the energy ( ϕ and Q are given smooth functions):</p><p>i ∂ t u = Δ u − f ( u )     for   x ∈ Ω ⊂ R n , (1.3)</p><p>u ( x ,0 ) = ϕ ( x ) ,</p><p>u ( x , t ) = Q ( x , t )     for     x ∈ ∂ Ω ,</p><p>the existence of global solution of finite energy was proved in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.115699-ref15">15</xref>] .</p><p>For a class of second-order nonlinear difference equations with Dirichlet boundary value problem, sufficient conditions on the existence of sign-changing solutions were obtained by using invariant sets of descending flow and variational methods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.115699-ref16">16</xref>] .</p><p>In this paper, we will investigate a more general version of nonlinear Schr&#246;dinger equation i u t = u x x − g | u | p u when x ∈ Ω = [ 0 , L ] , 0 ≤ t &lt; ∞ . The domain is a semi-infinite strip instead of a quarter plane. Dirichlet type inhomogeneous boundary conditions are imposed on the boundary. In next section, we use semigroup technique to prove the existence and uniqueness theorem for a local classical solution when initial and boundary data are smooth.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Existence and Uniqueness Theorem</title><p>We consider the following Dirichlet type inhomogenous boundary value problem for the 1D NLS:</p><p>i u t = u x x − g | u | p − 1 u , (2.1)</p><p>x ∈ Ω = [ 0 , L ] ,     0 ≤ t &lt; ∞ ,     g ∈ R ,     p &gt; 3</p><p>u ( x , 0 ) = h ( x ) ,       u ( 0 , t ) = Q 1 ( t ) ,     u ( L , t ) = Q 2 ( t ) .</p><p>We assume that h ( x ) ∈ H 2 ( Ω ) , Q 1 ( t ) ∈ C 1 ( Ω ) , Q 2 ( t ) ∈ C 1 ( Ω ) . In addition, the initial and boundary data satisfy the necessary compatibility conditions to ensure the existence of solution at ∂ Ω and t = 0 .</p><p>We use the following substitution (note that g &gt; 0 is no longer required):</p><p>u ( x , t ) = v ( x , t ) + x L Q 2 ( t ) + L − x L Q 1 ( t ) = v ( x , t ) + F ( x , t ) (2.2)</p><p>and convert (2.1) to</p><p>i v t + i F t = v x x − g | v + F | p − 1 ( v + F ) (2.3)</p><p>This can be expressed as the following system (for some a &gt; 0 ):</p><p>v t = − i v x x − a v + K ( t , v ) (2.4)</p><p>v ( x , 0 ) = h ( x ) − F ( x , 0 ) ,</p><p>v ( 0 , t ) = u ( 0 , t ) − F ( 0 , t ) = 0 ,</p><p>v ( L , t ) = u ( L , t ) − F ( L , t ) = 0.</p><p>where K consists of all nonlinear terms of v up to power of p and Q 1 , Q ′ 1 , Q 2 , Q ′ 2 . We have the following existence of a unique classical solution.</p><p>Theorem 2.1. Let A = − i D x 2 − a v with D ( A ) = { f ∈ H 2 ( Ω ) ; f ( 0 ) = 0 , f ( L ) = 0 } . Given h ∈ H 2 ( Ω ) ,</p><p>v = u − x L Q 2 ( t ) − L − x L Q 1 ( t ) and h ( 0 ) = Q 1 ( 0 ) , h ( L ) = Q 2 ( 0 ) , the equation</p><p>(2.4) for v has a unique classical solution v ∈ C 1 ( [ 0 , T M ) , L 2 ) ∩ C 0 ( [ 0 , T M ) , D ( A ) ) with either T M = ∞ or lim ‖ v ( t ) ‖ D ( A ) = ∞ as t → T M . Therefore, the equation (2.1) with Dirichlet boundray data has a unique classical solution u ∈ C 1 ( [ 0 , T M ) , L 2 ) ∩ C 0 ( [ 0 , T M ) , H 2 ) with either T M = ∞ or lim ‖ u ( t ) ‖ H 2 = ∞ as t → T M .</p><p>Proof. Define W = W ( Ω ) = { u ∈ L 2 ( Ω ) , u x x ∈ L 2 ( Ω ) } with norm ‖ u ‖ W 2 = ‖ u ‖ 2 2 + ‖ u x x ‖ 2 2 . Then W is complete and the mapping u ↦ u x : W → L 2 is continuous. To check A os a semigroup generator, we look at the resolvant R λ = ( λ − A ) − 1 so consider ( λ − A ) v = f with v ( 0 ) = v ( L ) = 0 and f ∈ L 2 . This means λ v + i v ″ + a v = f and v ( 0 ) = v ( L ) = 0 . Since</p><p>( ( λ − A ) v , v ) = ( λ + a ) ‖ v ‖ 2 + i ∫ 0 L     v ″ v &#175; d x = ( λ + a ) ‖ v ‖ 2 2 − i ‖ v ′ ‖ 2 2 (2.5)</p><p>we take the real parts and use Cauchy-Schwarz inequality to see that ( λ + a ) ‖ v ‖ 2 ≤ ‖ ( λ − A ) v ‖ . As we know, Cauchy-Schwarz inequality is considered one of the most important and widely used inequalities in mathematics (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.115699-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.115699-ref17">17</xref>] for details).</p><p>By Hille-Yosida Theorem in functional analysis which characterizes the generators of strongly continuous one-parameter semigroups of linear operators on Banach spaces [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.115699-ref17">17</xref>] , A generates a strongly continuous contraction semigroup N ( t ) = exp ( A t ) for any a ≥ 0 . Therefore (2.4) is converted into an integral equation:</p><p>v ( t ) = N ( t ) v 0 + ∫ 0 t     N ( t − s ) K ( s , v ) d s . (2.6)</p><p>Evidently D ( A ) with the graph norm is a Hilbert space with norm equivalent to the H<sup>2</sup> norm. From Gagliardo-Nirenberg estimates, we see that K is continuous in t and locally Lipschitz in D ( A ) uniformly on [ 0, T ] . Applying Theorem 6.1.7 of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.115699-ref17">17</xref>] , the local existence theorem is therefore proved.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Conclusion</title><p>Important evolution equations like the nonlinear Schr&#246;dinger equation and the Ginzburg-Landau equation have many physical applications when the boundary data is not zero. Studies on these problems contribute towards a better understanding of nature of the partial differential equations (PDEs). This paper is focused on a nonlinear Schr&#246;dinger equation posed in a semi-infinite strip. We apply semigroup theory used to prove that there exists a unique strong local solution. The PDE method employed here is a different approach to studying the NLS via inverse scattering transformation. There is some further research that could be done in this area, such as well-posedness of the system, existence of a global solution, and decay estimates and numerical simulation. We will continue our research and report any progress.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This research was supported by the William R. Kenan Jr. Professorship, the Brachman Hoffman Small Grant and a Wellesley College Faculty Award.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Bu, C. (2022) A Dirichlet Inhomogenous Boundary Value Problem for 1D Nonlinear Schr&#246;dinger Equation. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 10, 656-660. https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2022.103047</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.115699-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chu, C., Xiang, L. and Baransky, Y. (1983) Solitary Waves Induced by Boundary Motion. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 36, 495-504. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160360407</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115699-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Kaup, D. (1984) Forced Integrable Systems. In: Rogers, C. and Moodie, T., Eds., Wave Phenomena: Modern Theory and Applications, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 163-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-0208(08)71262-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115699-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sheerin, J., et al. (1982) Solitons and Ionospheric Modification. Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics, 44, 1043-1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9169(82)90016-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115699-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zakharov, V. and Shabat, A. (1972) Exact Theory of Two-Dimensional Self-Focusing and One-Dimensional Self-Modulation of Waves in Nonlinear Media. Soviet Physics—JETP, 34, 62-69.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115699-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Craig, W. and Wayne, C. (1993) Newton’s Method and Periodic Solutions of Nonlinear Wave Equations. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 46, 1409-1498. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160461102</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115699-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Craig, W., Kappeler, T. and Strauss, W. (1992) Grain of Regularity for Equations of KdV Type. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré C, Analyse non linéaire, 9, 147-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0294-1449(16)30243-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115699-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dafermos, C. (1970) Wave Equations with Weak Damping. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 18, 759-767. https://doi.org/10.1137/0118068</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115699-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Strauss, W. (1989) Nonlinear Wave Equations. CBMS (AMS), Providence. https://doi.org/10.1090/cbms/073</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115699-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jones, C., Gardner, R. and Kapitula, T. (1980) Stability of Travelling Waves for Nonconvex Scalar Viscous Conservation Laws. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 46, 505-526. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160460404</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115699-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jones, C. (1988) Standing Waves of Nonlinear Schr&amp;#246;dinger Equations: Existence and Stability, Material Instabilities in Continuum Mechanics (Edinburgh, 1985-86). Oxford University Press, Oxford, 197-216.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115699-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yan, G. (1995) Singular Solutions of the Vlasov-Maxwell System on a Half Line. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 43, 241-304. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382888</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115699-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carroll, R. and Bu, C. (1991) Solutions of the Forced Nonlinear Schr&amp;#246;dinger Equation (NLS) Using PDE Techniques. Applicable Analysis, 41, 33-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036819108840015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115699-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bu, C. (1992) On Well-Posedness of the Forced Nonlinear Schr&amp;#246;dinger Equation. Applicable Analysis, 46, 219-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036819208840122</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115699-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bu, C. (2000) Nonlinear Schr&amp;#246;dinger Equation on the Semi-Infinite Line. Chinese Annals of Mathematics, Series A, 21, 437-448.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115699-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Strauss, W. and Bu, C. (2001) An Inhomogeneous Boundary Value Problem for Nonlinear Schr&amp;#246;dinger Equations. Journal of Differential Equations, 173, 79-91. https://doi.org/10.1006/jdeq.2000.3871</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115699-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Long, Y. and Zeng, B. (2017) Sign-Changing Solutions for Discrete Dirichlet Boundary Value Problem. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 5, 2228-2243. https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2017.511182</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115699-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pazy, A. (1983) Semigroups of Linear Operators and Applications to PDE. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5561-1</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>