﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is a staple food for half of the world’s population [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113637-ref1">1</xref>] . It is central to Bangladesh’s economy, accounting for nearly 20 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) and providing about one-sixth of the national income of Bangladesh [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113637-ref2">2</xref>] . Rice blast caused by Magnaporthe oryzae oryzae (MoO) is a key concern in combating global food insecurity given the disease is responsible for approximately 30% of rice production losses globally the equivalent of feeding 60 million people [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113637-ref3">3</xref>] . These losses increase the global rice price and reduce consumer welfare and food security. As rice is the staple crop for more than half the world’s population so any reduction in rice blast would have substantial beneficial effects on consumer livelihoods. Pyricularia oryzae (Po) isolated from infected leaf and panicle and identified based on cultural characteristics and conidia morphology and mycelia growth of Pyricularia isolates varied significantly with fair to excellent sporulation ability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113637-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>Chemicals are commonly applied for controlling rice blast disease [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113637-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113637-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113637-ref7">7</xref>] . However, the frequent use of fungicides on crops may cause hazards to human beings, plant health, beneficial micro-organisms, and develop fungicide resistance into the pathogens and residual toxicity in plant parts. On the other hand, some bio-control agents have proved to be most secure and have no adverse impact on environment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113637-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113637-ref9">9</xref>] . Eight botanical plant extracts have been tested in vitro against Magnaporthe oryzae oryzae and found satisfactory reduction in mycelia growth of MoO [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113637-ref10">10</xref>] . Trichoderma spp., the well-known antagonistic fungi are widely used in agriculture as bio-fungicides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113637-ref11">11</xref>] . Trichoderma spp., inhibited the mycelia growth of rice blast fungus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113637-ref12">12</xref>] . The use of antagonistic fungi to control the destructive plant pathogens is getting more importance since few decades [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113637-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113637-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>Bio-control agents are widely regarded as natural remedy with non-threatening affect. Trichoderma species act against target organisms in several ways [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113637-ref15">15</xref>] . Volatile and non-volatile compounds of Trichoderma spp. were analysed by GC-MS technique (Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), an analytical method that combines the features of gas-chromatography and mass spectrometry to identify different substances within a test sample [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113637-ref16">16</xref>] . Time of the application of the Trichoderma is also important. The purpose of this study was to evaluate comparative efficacy assessment methods of bio-agent Trichoderma harzianum in controlling Magnaporthe oryzae oryzae (MoO) in vitro.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Materials</title><sec id="s2_1_1"><title>2.1.1. Experimental Site</title><p>The experiment was conducted in the Laboratory, Department of Plant Pathology, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka.</p></sec><sec id="s2_1_2"><title>2.1.2. Experimental Period</title><p>The experiment was conducted during the period from June 2018 to December 2019.</p></sec><sec id="s2_1_3"><title>2.1.3. Inoculum of Test Fungus M. oryzae oryzae (MoO)</title><p>The present study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy assessment methods of T. harzianum THR 4 against a virulent isolate of Magnaporthe oryzae oryzae MoO19 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113637-ref17">17</xref>] . The isolate was identified based on three celled pyriform conidia (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2_1_4"><title>2.1.4. Inoculum of antagonist T. harzianumTHR4</title><p>The bio-control agent T. harzianum THR 4 was obtained from Pathology Laboratory, Department of Plant Pathology, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113637-ref18">18</xref>] . T. harzianum was sub-cultured in in vitro condition for antagonism test against MoO (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Materials</title><sec id="s2_2_1"><title>2.2.1. Efficacy of Bio-Agent T. harzianum THR 4 in Controlling Radial Mycelia Growth of MoO in Vitro</title><p>Bio-control agent such as T. harzianum was tested under laboratory conditions against rice blast causing fungus, MoO. This experiment was done to evaluate T. harzianum against MoO following different methods in dual culture on PDA plates.</p><p>Four mm disc of test fungus and biocontrol agent at 2DAI (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>) were placed at opposite sides to each other in Petri dishes in five different designs that containing sterilized PDA medium. There were 3 replications of each design containing bio-control agent and Magnaporthe oryzae oryzae and were incubated at 25<sup>o</sup>C. Petri dishes containing the test fungus and bio-control agents separately incubated at 30<sup>o</sup>C served as control. Colony diameter of both bio-control agent and the test fungus were recorded after each 48 hours by giving straight line in the center of both colonies with permanent marker. The interaction and mechanism of antagonism was observed when the colonies of both fungi met [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113637-ref19">19</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_2"><title>2.2.2. Designs of Dual Culture Technique for Observing the Efficiency of T. harzianum against MoO</title><p>This experiment was done following five different designs of dual culture technique to know the interactions among MoO and Trichoderma harzianum THR 4 and also control plates were set.</p><p>In first design, one disc of MoO was set against one disc of T. harzianum following dual culture technique. In second design, three discs of T. harzianum were set on the periphery of the petridish surrounding one disc of MoO on the center of the petridish following dual culture technique. In third design, four discs of T. harzianum were set on the periphery of the petridish surrounding one disc of MoO on the center of the petridish following dual culture technique. In fourth design, three discs of MoO were set on the periphery of the petridish surrounding one disc of T. harzianum on the center of the petridish following dual culture technique. In fifth design, four discs of MoO were set on the periphery of</p><p>the petridish surrounding one disc of T. harzianum on the center of the petridish following dual culture technique. There was also two different petridish set as control condition for both tested fungus MoO and bio-agent Trichoderma harzianum (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_3"><title>2.2.3. Experimental Design and Statistical Analysis</title><p>The experiment was done following Complete Randomized Design (CRD) with three replications and statistical analysis was done using Statistix10 software. Data were analyzed at 5% level of significance. One factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) was done and critical value for comparison was recorded as LSD value. There are different groups (a, b, etc.) in which the means are not significantly different from one another. Data are significantly different from one group to another.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Result</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. In Vitro Mycelia Radial Growth of MoO with Bio-Agent Trichoderma harzianum THR 4 in PDA</title><p>Third design where four discs of T. harzianum were set on the periphery of the petridish surrounding one disc of MoO on the center of the petridish following dual culture technique successfully inhibited the fungal growth and infection of MoO (2 mm) whereas the growth of bio-agent was 16.67 mm followed by second design where three discs of T. harzianum were set on the periphery of the petridish surrounding one disc of MoO on the center of the petridish inhibited the fungal growth (4.33 mm) whereas the growth of bio-agent was 18.33 mm at 6DAI (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). In fourth and fifth design mycelia radial growth of MoO was 6.67 mm whereas the mycelia growth of bio-agent was 33.33 mm followed by first design where mycelia radial growth of MoO was 11.67 mm whereas mycelia radial growth of T. harzianum recorded 28.33 mm. In control condition mycelia radial growth of tested fungus and bio-agent was 25 mm and 40 mm respectively.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Mycelia radial growth inhibition of MoO and T. harzianum THR 4 by each other in different in vitro treatment design in PDA</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Treatment Design</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mycelia radial growth of MoO (mm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >% Inhibition of growth</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mycelia radial growth of Th (mm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >% Inhibition of growth</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1. MoO and Th disks were set in the opposite periphery.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.67 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.33 c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2. MoO disk in the center and three Th disks on the periphery of the dish in equal distance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.33 d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.33 d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3. MoO disk in the center and four Th disks on the periphery of the dish in equal distance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.00 e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.67 d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4. Th disk in the center and three MoO on the periphery of the petridish in equal distance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.67 c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.33 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.68</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5. Th disk in the center and four discs of MoO on the periphery of the petridish in equal distance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.67 c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.33 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.68</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6. Control condition for MoO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.00 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7. Control condition for Th</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.00 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LSD (0.05)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>MoO = Magnaporthe oryzae oryzae and Th = Trichoderma harzianum THR 4.</p><p>In in vitro condition third design where four discs of T. harzianum were set on the periphery of the petridish surrounding one disc of MoO on the center of the petridish following dual culture technique gave most satisfactory result with 92% growth inhibition of MoO in compare to control treatment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Interaction between MoO and Trichoderma harzianum THR 4 in Dual Culture Designs</title><p>Data were recorded to understand the interactions between tested fungus MoO and bio-agent Trichoderma harzianum THR 4. The third design where four discs</p><p>of T. harzianum were set on the periphery of the petridish surrounding one disc of MoO on the center of the petridish following dual culture technique successfully inhibited the fungal growth and infection of MoO towards bio-agent was 2mm whereas the growth of bio-agent towards the tested fungus was 15 mm followed by second design where three discs of T. harzianum were set on the periphery of the petridish surrounding one disc of MoO on the center of the petridish inhibited the fungal growth (4 mm) towards bio-agent whereas the growth of bio-agent towards tested pathogen was 18 mm at 6DAI (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). In fourth design mycelia radial growth of MoO towards T. harzianum was</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Interaction of Magnaporthe oryzae oryzae (MoO) with Trichoderma harzianum THR 4 (Th) in dual culture designs in PDA at 6 DAI</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Treatment Design</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mycelia radial growth of MoO towards Th at 6 DAI (mm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >% Inhibition of MoO growth in 6 DAI</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mycelia radial growth of Th towards MoO at 6 DAI (mm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >% Inhibition of Th growth in 6 DAI</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1. MoO and Th disks were set in the opposite periphery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.33 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.33 c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2. MoO disk in the center and three Th disks on the periphery of the dish in equal distance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.00 cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.00 d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3. MoO disk in the center and four Th disks on the periphery of the dish in equal distance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.00 d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.00 e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4. Th disk in the center and three MoO on the periphery of the petridish in equal distance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.67 c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.33 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5. Th disk in the center and four discs of MoO on the periphery of the petridish in equal distance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.00 c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.00 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6. Control condition for MoO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.00 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7. Control condition for Th</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.00 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LSD (0.05)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>MoO = Magnaporthe oryzae oryzae and Th = Trichoderma harzianum THR 4.</p><p>4.67 mm whereas the mycelia growth of bio-agent towards MoO was 35.33 mm followed by fifth design where mycelila radial growth of MoO was towards T. harzianum was 5 mm whereas mycelia radial growth of T. harzianum towards MoO was recorded 35 mm and in first design where mycelia radial growth of MoO was towards T. harzianum was 8.33 mm whereas mycelia radial growth of T. harzianum towards MoO was recorded 28.33 mm. In control condition mycelia radial growth of tested fungus and bio-agent was 25 mm and 40 mm respectively.</p><p>In vitro condition third design where four discs of T. harzianum were set on the periphery of the petridish surrounding one disc of MoO on the center of the petridish following dual culture technique gave most satisfactory result.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussions</title><p>Trichoderma species have been investigated as biological control agents over 70 years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113637-ref20">20</xref>] . In our study all five designs of in vitro studies shown reduced growth of MoO compared to control plates. Among the five designs of our experiment the third design where four discs of T. harzianum was set on the periphery of the petridish surrounding one disc of MoO on the center of the petridish in dual culture technique gave most satisfactory result in both cases of mean mycelium growth inhibition and interactions with MoO. In a previous study the highest percentage inhibition of radial growth (PIRG) values was observed with T. harzianum IMI-392432 using two dual culture methods, 63.80% in Method I and 80.82% in Method II [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113637-ref21">21</xref>] . In the first method (Method-I), an agar disc (6 mm) was taken from 4-day-old PDA culture plates of each Trichoderma isolate and placed at the periphery of the PDA plates (9 mm). Another agar disc of the same size of C. paradoxa was also placed at the periphery but on the opposing end of the same Petri dish. In the second method (Method-II), an agar disc (6-mm) of the antagonist, Trichoderma (T), was placed 2 cm away from the periphery of the Petri dish, and a same sized agar disc of the test fungus, C. paradoxa (C), was similarly placed 2 cm away from the edge of the Petri plate but on the end opposite of Trichoderma sample. As a control, C. paradoxa was placed in a similar manner on a fresh PDA plate. They also used poison agar, and direct methods to assess the ability of Trichoderma virens IMI-392430, T. pseudokoningii IMI-392431, T. harzianum IMI-392432, T. harzianum IMI-392433, and T. harzianum IMI-392434 to control C. paradoxa, which causes the pineapple disease of sugarcane. In another study it had been observed that Trichoderma sp. isolated from soil and tested in vitro against soil borne pathogens viz. Sclerotium rolfsii, Rhizoctonia solani, Sclerotinia sclerotium and Fusarium solani using dual culture technique and 100% growth inhibition was found in case of Sclerotium rolfsii [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113637-ref22">22</xref>] . T. viride (MO) also reduced the colony area of Macrophomina phaseoli by 19.2 and 34.9% using the dual culture and cellophane methods, respectively reported in other study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113637-ref23">23</xref>] .</p><p>Trichoderma viride was evaluated under laboratory conditions against some common phyto-pathogens belonging to different groups of fungi, effectively inhibited the growth of the tested pathogens in dual cultures by hyperparasitism and by secretion of volatile and non-volatile metabolites. In the dual culture experiment, maximum inhibition was recorded for Fusarium oxysporum followed by Rhizoctonia solani and least for Alternaria zinnia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113637-ref24">24</xref>] . Other than mycelia interaction and hyperparasitism by the Trichoderma species, scientists have also considered the action use of antibiotic metabolites as a contributing mechanism in the biocontrol of plant pathogens [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113637-ref25">25</xref>] .</p><p>Volatile and non-volatile compounds of Trichoderma spp. were analyzed by GC-MS technique and the properties of distinguished compounds showed antifungal, antimicrobial and antibiotic activities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113637-ref26">26</xref>] . Volatile compounds of T. harzianum and T. viride showed highest percent abundance for glacial acetic acid (45.32%) and propyl-benzene (41.75%), respectively. In case of non-volatile compounds, T. harzianum and T. viride showed D-Glucose, 6-O-α-D-galactopyranosyl (38.45%) and 17-Octadecynoic acid (36.23%), respectively. The results of present study confirmed that T. harzianum can be used as a promising biological control agent.</p><p>Our results are in accordance to those reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113637-ref27">27</xref>] who agreed to the statement that antagonistic such as T. harzianum gave 70%~88% mycelia and conidial inhibition of M. oryzae. Similarly, an interaction study different species of Trichoderma against 24 airborne plant pathogens including M. oryzae were studied where T. hamatum, T. harzianum, T. koningii, T. pseudokoningii and T. viride were found to have strong antagonistic potential. He also found that selective isolates of T. harzianum and T. viride showed severe antagonism against M. oryzae, while T. polysporum was weaker antagonist [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113637-ref28">28</xref>] . Most of the antagonistic fungi were effectively inhibited the spore production of the plant pathogens where the growth inhibition (GI) of the spore production were greatly increased in some of the antagonistic fungi used [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113637-ref29">29</xref>] . This was happened due to the activity of enzymes produced by the antagonistic fungi such as Trichoderma sp. and Penicillium sp. The isolate T39 of Trichoderma harzianum which can be regarded as a model to demonstrate biocontrol under commercial conditions and the mechanisms involved [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113637-ref30">30</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Five different designs of dual culture technique were used to know the interactions between Magnaporthe oryzae oryzae (MoO) and T. harzianum THR 4. In in vitro condition third design where four discs of T. harzianum were set on the periphery of the petridish surrounding one disc of MoO on the center of the petridish in dual culture technique gave most satisfactory result with 92% growth inhibition of MoO. All the designs of dual culture were effective in vitro test against the test fungus Magnaporthe oryzae oryzae.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank anonymous reviewers for their kind review of the manuscript. This research was financially supported by Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University Research System (SAURES), Project ID: SAU/SAURES/Project/2018-19/4829/1505(13).</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Competing Interests</title><p>Authors have declared that no competing interests exist.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Authors’ Contributions</title><p>This work was carried out in collaboration among all authors. Author ZN conducted the research work. Author FMA designed and supervised the study and edited the manuscript. Author LL and MLA managed the literature searches. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Nazifa, Z., Aminuzzaman, F.M., Laila, L. and Ashrafi , M.L. (2021) Comparative in Vitro Efficacy Assessment Methods of a Bioagent Trichoderma harzianum THR 4 against Rice Blast Pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae oryzae. Open Access Library Journal, 8: e7510. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1107510</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.113637-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tobias, A., Molina, I., Valera, H.G., Mottaleb, K.A. and Mohanty, S. (2012) Hand-book on Rice Policy for Asia. International Rice Research Institute, Los Ba?os. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113637-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Timothy, S.T., Khandaker, M., Catherine, C., Anwarul, H., Nazria, I., Saad, Q. and Yan, S. (2013) Agriculture and Adaptation in Bangladesh: Current and Projected Impacts of Climate Change. Discussion Paper, IFPRI (International Food Policy Research Institute), Wshington DC, No. 01281, 76.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113637-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nalley, L., Tsiboe, F., Durand-Morat, A., Shew, A. and Thoma, G. (2016) Economic and Environmental Impact of Rice Blast Pathogen (Magnaporthe oryzae) Alleviation in the United States. PLoS ONE, 11, Article ID: e0167295.  
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167295</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113637-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rayhanul, M.I., Aminuzzaman, F.M., Chowdhury, M.S.M., Laila, L. and Ahmed, M. (2019) Survey on Rice Blast in Some Selected area of Bangladesh and in Vitro Evaluation of Fungicides against Pyricularia oryzae. Bangladesh Journal of Plant Pathology, 35, 59-64.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113637-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oh, Y.Y. (2008) Genome-Wide Transcription Studies on Infection Structure Formation and Function in Magnaporthe grisea. Ph.D. Dissertation, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 142.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113637-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anwar, A., Bhat, G.N. and Singhara, G.S. (2002) Management of Sheath Blight and Blast in Rice through Seed Treatment. Annals of Plant Protection Sciences, 10, 285- 287.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113637-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gohel, N.M., Chauhan, H.L. and Mehta, A.N. (2008) Bio-Efficacy of Fungicides against Pyricularia oryzae the Incitant of Rice Blast. Journal of Plant Disease Sci-ences, 3, 189-192.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113637-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Iftikhar, T., Babar, L.K., Zahoor, S. and Khan, N.G. (2010) Best Irrigation Man-agement Practices in Cotton. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 42, 3023-3028.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113637-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Babar, L.K., Iftikhar, T., Khan, H. and Makhdum, A.H. (2011) Agronomic Trials on Sugarcane Crop under Faisalabad Conditions. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 43, 929- 935.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113637-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nazifa, Z., Aminuzzaman, F.M., Laila, L. and Rehena, M.K. (2021) In Vitro Efficacy of Botanicals against Rice Blast Pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae oryzae. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 12, 662-678. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2021.124045</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113637-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Mukherjee, P.K., Nautiyal, C.S. and Mukhopadhyay, A.N. (2008) Molecular Mechanisms of Biocontrol by Trichoderma spp. In: Nautiyal, C.S. and Dion, P., Eds., Molecular Mechanisms of Plant and Microbe Coexistence, Vol. 15, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 243-262. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75575-3_10</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113637-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ouazzani, T.A., Mouria, A., Douira, A., Benkirane, R., Mlaiki, A. and El-Yachioui, M. (1998) In Vitro Effect of pH and Temperature on the Ability of Trichoderma spp., to Reduce the Growth of Pyricularia oryzae. Journal of CAB Direct, 96, 19-24.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113637-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Burges, H.D. and Jones, K.A. (1998) Trends in Formulation of Microorganisms and Future Research Requirements. In: Burges, H.D., Ed., Formulation of Microbial Biopesticides, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 311-332.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4926-6_10</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113637-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Whipps, J.M. (2001) Microbial Interactions and Biocontrol in the Rhizosphere. Journal of Experimental Botany, 52, 487-511.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/52.suppl_1.487</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113637-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Harman, G.E. (2000) Myths and Dogmas of Biocontrol Changes in Perceptions Derived from Research on Trichoderma harzianum T-22. Plant Disease, 84, 377-393.  
https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.4.377</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113637-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sparkman, O.D., Penton, Z. and Kitson, F.G. (2011) Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry: A Practical Guide. 2nd Edition, Academic Press, Cambridge.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-17039-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113637-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nazifa, Z., Aminuzzaman, F.M., Akhter, K., Rehena, M.K. and Laila, L. (2021) Survey on Rice Blast and Morphological Characterization of Magnaporthe oryzae oryzae. Journal of Advances in Microbiology, 21, 8-21.  
https://doi.org/10.9734/jamb/2021/v21i130315</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113637-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aminuzzaman, F.M., Jahan, S.N., Shammi, J., Mitu, A.I. and Liu, X.Z. (2018) Isolation and Screening of Fungi Associated with Eggs and Females of Root-Knot Nematodes and Their Biocontrol Potential against Meloidogyne incognita in Bangladesh. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 51, 288-308.  
https://doi.org/10.1080/03235408.2018.1472359</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113637-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yaqub, F. and Shahzad, S. (2005) In-Vitro Evaluation of Microbial Antagonists against Sclerotium rolfsii. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 37, 1033-1036.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113637-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Samuels, G.J. (1996) Trichoderma: A Review of Biology and Systematics of the Genus. Mycological Research, 100, 923-935.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-7562(96)80043-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113637-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rahman, M.A., Begum, M.F. and Alam, M.F. (2009) Screening of Trichoderma Isolates as a Biological Control Agent against Ceratocystis paradoxa Causing Pineapple Disease of Sugarcane. Mycobiology, 37, 277-285.  
https://doi.org/10.4489/MYCO.2009.37.4.277</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113637-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bastakoti, S., Belbase, S., Manandhar, S. and Arjyal, C. (2017) Trichoderma Spe-cies as Biocontrol Agent against Soil Borne Fungal Pathogens. Nepal Journal of Biotechnology, 5, 39-45.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113637-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Etabarian</surname><given-names> H.R. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2006</year>)<article-title>Evaluation of Trichoderma Isolates for Biological Control of Charcoal Stem Rot in Melon Caused by Macrophomina phaseolina</article-title><source> Journal of Agricultural Science Technology</source><volume> 8</volume>,<fpage> 243</fpage>-<lpage>250</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113637-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tapwal, A., Singh, U., Singh, G., Garg, S. and Kumar, R. (2011) In Vitro Antagonism of Trichoderma viride against Five Phytopathogens. Pest Technology, 5, 59-62.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113637-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ghisalberti, E.L. and Rowland, C.Y. (1993) Antifungal Metabolites from Trichoderma harzianum. Journal of Natural Products, 56, 1799-1804.  
https://doi.org/10.1021/np50100a020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113637-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mukesh, M., Prashant, S. andleeb, Z., Manish, K.D. and Upadhyay, R.S. (2017) Antagonistic Assessment of Trichoderma spp. by Producing Volatile and Non-Volatile Compounds against Different Fungal Pathogens. Archives of Phyto-pathology and Plant Protection, 50, 629-648. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235408.2017.1357360</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113637-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gouramanis</surname><given-names> G.D. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1995</year>)<article-title>Biological and Chemical Control of Rice Blast Disease (Pyricularia oryzae) in North Greece</article-title><source> Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes</source><volume> 15</volume>,<fpage> 61</fpage>-<lpage>68</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113637-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Watanabe</surname><given-names> N. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1985</year>)<article-title>Antagonism by Various Kinds of Trichoderma Fungi to Airborne Plant Pathogens</article-title><source> Bulletin of the Faculty of Agriculture-Meiji University</source><volume> 68</volume>,<fpage> 1</fpage>-<lpage>9</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113637-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Srinon, W., Chuncheen, K., Jirattiwarutkul, K., Soytong, K. and Kanokmedhakul, S. (2006) Efficacies of Antagonistic Fungi against Fusarium Wilt Disease of Cu-cumber and Tomato and the Assay of Its Enzyme Activity. Journal of Agricultural Technology, 2, 191-201.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113637-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elad, Y. (2000) Biological Control of Foliar Pathogens by Means of T. harzianum and Potential Modes of Action. Crop Protection, 19, 709-714.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(00)00094-6</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>