<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJOph</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Ophthalmology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2165-7408</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojoph.2021.114029</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJOph-113539</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Mechanical Eye Trauma Epidemiology, Prognostic Factors, and Management Controversies—An Update
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sharah</surname><given-names>Rahman</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ava</surname><given-names>Hossain</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sarwar</surname><given-names>Alam</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Anisur</surname><given-names>Rahman</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chandana</surname><given-names>Sultana</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yusuf</surname><given-names>Jamal Khan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Md.</surname><given-names>Amiruzzaman</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>OSB Eye Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Ispahani Islamia Eye Institute and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Dhaka Medical College and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Bangladesh Eye Hospital and Institute, Dhaka, Bangladesh</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>14</day><month>09</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>348</fpage><lpage>363</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>24,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>30,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Purpose of Review: The management of eye injuries is both difficult and argumentative. This study attempts to highlight the management of ocular trauma using currently available information in the literature and author experience. This review presents a workable framework from the first presentation, epidemiology, classification, investigations, management principles, complications, prognostic factors, final visual outcome and management debates. 
  Review Findings: Mechanical ocular trauma is a leading cause of monocular blindness and possible handicap worldwide. Among several classification systems, the most widely accepted is Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology (BETT). Mechanical ocular trauma is a topic of unsolved controversy. Patching for corneal abrasion, paracentesis for hyphema, the timing of cataract surgery and intraocular lens implantation are all issues in anterior segment injuries. Regarding posterior segment controversies, the timing of vitrectomy, use of prophylactic cryotherapy, the necessity of intravitreal antibiotics in the absence of infection, the use of vitrectomy vs vitreous tap in traumatic endophthalmitis is the issues. The pediatric age group needs to be approached by a different protocol due to the risk of amblyopia, intraocular inflammation, and significant vitreoretinal adhesions. The various prognostic factors have a role in the final visual outcome. B scan is used to exclude R.D, Intraocular foreign body (IOFB), and vitreous haemorrhage in hazy media. Individual surgical strategies are used for every patient according to the classification and extent of the injuries. 
  Conclusion: This article examines relevant evidence on the management challenges and controversies of mechanical trauma of the eye and offers treatment recommendations based on published research and the authors’ own experience.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Mechanical Eye Trauma</kwd><kwd> Bermingham Eye Trauma Terminology</kwd><kwd> Prognostic Factors for Mechanical Trauma</kwd><kwd> Epidemiology of Mechanical Eye Injury</kwd><kwd> Open Globe Injuries (OGI)</kwd><kwd> Ocular Trauma Scoring (OTS)</kwd><kwd> Classification and Regression Tree (CART) Model</kwd><kwd> Update of Mechanical Eye Trauma</kwd><kwd> Classification of Ocular Trauma</kwd><kwd> Controversies of Ocular Trauma</kwd><kwd> Challenges in Ocular Trauma Management</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Ocular trauma is a common, preventable cause of visual impairment. From developing to developed countries, eye injury causes a social burden to the community. The treating of eye injuries is both problematic and debatable [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref1">1</xref>]. There are controversies regarding classification system, treatment plan, management complication, need for multiple surgeries etc. when it comes to ocular trauma. The Beaver Dam Eye Study finds that the lifetime frequency of ocular trauma is 14.4 - 19.8 per cent [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref2">2</xref>]. Mechanical eye injuries affect the eye in many ways ranging from mild to severe morbidity. The burden of blindness is related to both its unavoidable impact on quality of life and the subsequent loss of production in these persons. Ocular trauma affects up to 6 million children worldwide each year, with a quarter-million requiring hospitalization [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref3">3</xref>]. The causative factors are widely variable and have a direct impact on visual outcome. Several questions like cause of the trauma, extent of the trauma, initial visual acuity, time of starting treatment, need of multiple surgery, association of endophthalmitis, counselling and realistic outcome of the management will be discussed. The management of ocular injuries in the paediatric age group differs significantly from adults. Over the last 30 years, developments in our understanding of the pathogenesis and management of ocular trauma, together with advances in ocular surgery apparatus and procedures, have enhanced the success of the final visual outcome. Mechanical eye injuries have a deep impact on the patient’s life as well as to the family and society. But it can be avoidable with social awareness and some protective measure. This review article will focus on the measure, that should be taken to avoid mechanical eye trauma, and we believe it will give the trauma surgeons overall guidance.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods of Literature Search</title><p>The following flow chart in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> explains the literature review process.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Epidemiology of Ocular Trauma</title><p>There is a wide range of demographic variations in the epidemiology of ocular</p><p>trauma. The mean age is in between the second to the fourth decade [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref5">5</xref>]. The highest rate of eye trauma is between 15 - 20 years. (11.5 per cent) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref6">6</xref>]. Males were more prone to injuries than females mentioned by different authors 84.6% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref5">5</xref>], 74% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref6">6</xref>] and 87.6% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref7">7</xref>]. It is a primary cause of monocular blindness, accounting for approximately 60% of cases, particularly among children. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref10">10</xref>]. Open globe injuries (OGI) are more common than closed globe injuries (CGI), with a proportion of approximately 60% vs 40% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref12">12</xref>]. Sharp items were responsible for more than half of all injuries. The most prevalent cause was work-related injuries, followed by falls [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref10">10</xref>]. For children, the most prevalent location of the injury is the home [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref13">13</xref>]. Penetrating corneal injury was the most common type among open globe injuries, followed by rupture globe, perforation, and Intra-ocular foreign body [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref14">14</xref>]. Among the closed globe injuries, contusion was most common, followed by laceration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref15">15</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Clinical Classification of Mechanical Trauma of the Eye</title><p>Open globe injury (OGI) and closed globe injury (CGI) are two types of mechanical eye injuries (CGI). Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology (BETT) is a widely used ocular trauma terminology system. It provides a precise definition for each injury type and a comprehensive framework for the injury type (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> &amp; Box 1). Although BETT exclusively addresses mechanical ocular injuries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref15">15</xref>] in terms of OGI, but avoids any ambiguity in communication. As a result, BETT cannot classify orbital and ocular adnexa injuries, and various categorization systems have been proposed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref15">15</xref>]. Grant and colleagues demonstrated the importance of lid and adnexal laceration in predicting the ultimate visual outcome in the Classification and Regression Tree analysis model (CART) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref16">16</xref>]. Agrawal et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref16">16</xref>] also recommended to include orbital and adnexal trauma. They suggested that anatomical landmarks such as the spiral of Tillux or the annulus of Zinn can be used to separate two zones and be included in future prognostic models [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref17">17</xref>].</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> The terminology used in BETT</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >BETT</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OGI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Open globe injury</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CGI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Closed globe injury</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Penetrating</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Full-thickness corneoscleral wound with no exit wound</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Perforating</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Full-thickness corneoscleral wound with an exit wound</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >IOFB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Intraocular foreign body retained in the globe</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><disp-formula id="scirp.113539-formula1"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/10-2020555x4.png?20211130082938806"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Box 1. Open globe injury classification.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Causology</title><p>There are several causative factors responsible for mechanical eye trauma. Among them, road traffic accident (RTA) is commonest in adult [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref18">18</xref>]. Sports-related injury is more common in children [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref19">19</xref>]. Other common causes are occupational injury, chemical burn, bomb blast, particle related injury, especially iron particle, blow to the eye like stone, fist or stick.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Prognostic Indicators for Ultimate Visual Outcome</title><p>The CART (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref16">16</xref>] and the ocular trauma score (OTS) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>)</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Summation of raw points of ocular trauma score (OTS)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >1. Initial visual acuity (without correction)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >No light perception</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >60</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Light perception/hand movement</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1/200 to 19/200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20/200 to 20/50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;20/40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2. Rupture globe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3. Endophthalmitis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4. Perforating ocular injury</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5. Retinal detachment (RD)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6. Afferent pupillary defect (RAPD)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−10</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref18">18</xref>] are two techniques for determining future visual prognosis following OGI.</p><p>The Ocular Trauma Classification Group defines wound location [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref20">20</xref>]. The OTS is computed by allocating numerical raw points to six variables: initial vision, an RAPD, perforating injury, rupture globe, endophthalmitis, and retinal detachment. These six prognostic factors are significantly related to the final visual outcome. The ratings are divided into five groups based on the likelihood of achieving a range of post-injury visual acuities (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The higher the OTS score, the more favourable the prognosis. The existence of an RAPD and poor initial visual acuity is the most predictive of vision loss in the CART classification tree; the presence of a laceration on the lid and the posterior position of the wound further predicted a poor visual outcome. According to Wai and Steel [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref19">19</xref>], while comparing OTS and CART models in the Management of OGI, the OTS had superior predictive accuracy. OTS is a helpful tool for patient counselling and care [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref21">21</xref>]. OTS has been verified in various series [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref16">16</xref>] and provides trauma patients and families with evidence-based predictive outcomes. On the U.S. Eye Injury website, one may also compute the OTS score [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref22">22</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>7. Initial Evaluation of Ocular Trauma</title><sec id="s7_1"><title>7.1. History</title><p>The processes, timing, and circumstances surrounding the injury should be meticulously documented, as they may become essential pieces of medicolegal evidence in the future. Any history of treatment, including medicine, surgery, or amblyopia, should be recorded. Type, place, timing, causative factors of the injury should be evaluated.</p></sec><sec id="s7_2"><title>7.2. Systemic Evaluation</title><p>Any life-threatening damage should be ruled out before approaching any patient with ocular trauma in emergency settings. Basic and advanced life support are the primary goals in severe injuries until the patient’s stabilization. Any defect in the pupil needs a complete evaluation of the posterior segment, including the retina, choroid, and optic nerve. Eyeshield should be placed over the eye immediately, and any pressure or eye drop should be avoided. Tetanus toxoid is recommended to prevent tetanus.</p></sec><sec id="s7_3"><title>7.3. Assessment of Vision</title><p>The visual status of the patient should be recorded in each eye by a standard vision chart. Any counting finger, hand movement, accurate projection in all quadrants, and perception of light (P.L.) should be appropriately recorded. The absence of light perception is not an indication for enucleation, and the globe may be salvageable [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref23">23</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s7_4"><title>7.4. Preoperative Ophthalmic Evaluation</title><p>Firstly, a thorough assessment of the mechanical injury is done. The primary management needs a complete ophthalmic examination, emphasizing the possibility of eye penetration and incorporating gonioscopy and dilated fundoscopy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref24">24</xref>]. If the study of the globe is challenging, computed tomography (C.T) can help. Due to management and medicolegal considerations, it is critical to record visual acuity as the initial step in approaching a patient with ocular damage. In all situations, photographic evidence or a diagrammatic depiction of the kind and degree of the damage should be made (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). Mechanical OGI should be classified according to the international classification system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref20">20</xref>] to prevent further ambiguity among the team. An anaesthetic examination is recommended to rule out globe disintegrate when OGI is suspected, but a thorough examination is not feasible (e.g., pediatric trauma).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s8"><title>8. Ophthalmic Manifestations of Ocular Trauma</title><p>1) Eye Lid and Adnexa: Edema, ecchymosis, and panda eyes, laceration, canaliculi injury and lid margin involvement</p><p>2) Extraocular muscle: Ocular motility should be tested in all positions of gaze in suspected orbital or cranial nerve injury with caution.</p><p>3) Orbit: Proptosis or enophthalmos. Crepitus on palpation, discomfort on palpation of bony orbital edge to rule out an orbital fracture. In pediatric orbital trauma, white eye orbital fracture should be checked carefully.</p><p>4) Conjunctiva: Injection, chemosis, haemorrhage, emphysema, pigmentation suggestive of uveal tissue involvement.</p><p>5) Cornea: Penetrating corneal injury with an extension of the wound, iris/ uveal prolapse, IOFB. In suspected self-sealing wounds, Siedel’s test is recommended.</p><p>6) Limbus: It acts as a landmark. Limbus can be involved in the lacerated injury of cornea, or sclera or sclera-corneal injury as well.</p><p>7) Sclera: Rupture globe or penetrating scleral injury with or without posterior extension, prolapse of intraocular content like choroid, vitreous, retinal etc.</p><p>8) Anterior chamber (A.C.): Depth of A.C., cells, hyphema, hypopyon, fibrin, membrane, lens particle, vitreous, IOFB.</p><p>9) Iris: Sphincter tear, iridodialysis, iris prolapse with loss of viability, aniridia,</p><p>angle recession, cyclodialysis cleft, iritis, iris atrophy, short miosis, traumatic dilatation of the pupil.</p><p>10) Crystalline Lens: Traumatic cataract, anterior capsule injury, posterior capsule rupture (PCR), zonular dehiscence, subluxation, dislocation, Vossius ring.</p><p>11) Vitreous: Haemorrhage, posterior vitreous detachment, IOFB</p><p>12) Retina: Retinal tear, subhyaloid or intraretinal haemorrhage, IOFB, retinal detachment, choroidal detachment, choroidal rupture, macular hole, Berlin’s oedema, traumatic endophthalmitis.</p><p>13) Intraocular pressure (IOP): IOP should be checked by non-contact tonometry in all cases if the patient allows it. It should not, however, be done if a globe rupture is suspected</p><p>14) Gonioscopy: In all trauma cases, a gonioscopy should be performed, especially following the absorption of hyphema, to check any angle recession or IOFB or pigmentation. It should not be attempted in cases when OGI is suspected.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>9. Role of Imaging in the Management of Ocular Trauma</title><p>Radiography, ultrasonography (USG), MRI, and C.T. are all widely used imaging technologies for the orbit and eye. In cloudy media, B-scan USG can be highly effective. In OGI, a gentle B Scan is recommended. C.T. Scan is commonly used in pinpointing the exact location of an IOFB or orbital damage. Zhang et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref25">25</xref>] reported that C.T. could fail to detect metal fragments &lt;0.5 mm. If a metallic intraocular or intraorbital foreign body is suspected, an MRI is not recommended.</p></sec><sec id="s10"><title>10. The Management Approach for Mechanical Eye Trauma</title><p>The fundamental goal of primary globe repair is to restore anatomical integrity while optimizing visual potential.</p><p>The four-pronged method for open-world injury management should include general principles for risk avoidance and outcome optimization.</p><p>1) Reduce the risk of further trauma;</p><p>2) Reduce the risk of infection;</p><p>3) Reduce the trauma victim’s and his family’s psychological trauma and</p><p>4) Control the legal problems.</p></sec><sec id="s11"><title>11. Preoperative Planning</title><sec id="s11_1"><title>11.1. Surgery Timetable</title><p>Unless prohibited by any other medical condition, primary globe repair should be performed as soon as possible, preferably within the first 24 hours.</p></sec><sec id="s11_2"><title>11.2. Consent and Counseling</title><p>The ophthalmologist must adequately inform the patient and family about the status of the eye, the surgical plan, costing and its complications. This should include that multiple surgeries may be needed, and primary repair is only the first step. The patient should be told of the OGI’s guarded prognosis before surgery to ensure reasonable expectations.</p></sec><sec id="s11_3"><title>11.3. Anaesthesia</title><p>Although the choice of anaesthetic medication, particularly in OGI, is debatable, general anaesthesia is advised for ocular injuries. We have performed repair under peribulbar anaesthesia in our unpublished data, with an excellent postoperative outcome (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s12"><title>12. Surgical Approach of Mechanical Trauma</title><sec id="s12_1"><title>12.1. Exposure of the Eye</title><p>The eye should be adequately exposed. If lid damage or a periorbital hematoma is hampering the view, it should be addressed initially.</p></sec><sec id="s12_2"><title>12.2. Cornea &amp; Sclera</title><p>Foreign debris and membrane should be removed during the initial exploratory operation. 360 degree conjunctival peritomy is ideal. Peroperative assessment of the injury with extension and meticulous planning is essential. Limbus should be secured first, followed by sclera and cornea. Usually, 10-0 monofilament Nylon is used for cornea, 8-0 Vicryl for sclera and 8-0 silk for conjunctiva. Corneal sutures should be placed radially and neither be too tight to distort the cornea nor too loose, leading to wound dehiscence. Corneal sutures should be shorter in the centre of the cornea than in the peripheral cornea (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). Experienced surgeons should perform the repair to reduce the mal handling of the delicate cornea and optimize the outcome. Stellate corneal laceration should be repaired using purse-string sutures.</p><p>Scleral wounds that extend beyond the rectus insertion are healed as far back</p><p>as feasible. The margin should be free of any uveal tissue. Any prolapsing vitreous should be cleared by anterior vitrectomy to avoid traction on the vitreous and retina.</p></sec><sec id="s12_3"><title>12.3. Iris</title><p>If the iris is viable, should try to preserve it as much as possible. In lacerated iris, pupilloplasty may be needed. In the case of irido-dialysis, a repair can be done by swing technique or modified McCalan suture.</p></sec><sec id="s12_4"><title>12.4. Lens</title><p>Traumatic cataracts can develop due to a breach in the capsule or perforating injury. Zonular dehiscence, anterior and posterior capsular tear, subluxation or dislocation may further compromise the lens status. Cataract extraction with simultaneous repair of the penetrating injury and IOL implantation has been widely recommended [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref26">26</xref>]. IOL may be inserted in the first sitting, or secondary IOL can be given later on. Biometry of the better eye is widely established in case traumatic eye [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref27">27</xref>]. Postoperative visual outcome following traumatic cataract correction revealed 31% of eyes had a visual acuity &gt; 20/40, and 61.0 per cent had a visual acuity &gt; 20/200, according to Shah et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref26">26</xref>]. The secondary IOL implantation and primary IOL implantation shoes similar visual outcomes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref28">28</xref>], though secondary IOL implantation allows the affected eye time to heal and the surgeon more time to plan. A separate incision site is recommended for cataract extraction, and cataracts should never be extracted through the site of laceration.</p></sec><sec id="s12_5"><title>12.5. Vitrectomy</title><p>Vitreoretinal surgical techniques allow many poor prognosis eyes to be salvaged [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref29">29</xref>]. Broadly, indications are R.D. with or without proliferative retinopathy (PVR), IOFB, lens-related problems and others. Scleral buckling also can be considered in traumatic R.D. without vitreous haemorrhage or PVR.</p></sec><sec id="s12_6"><title>12.6. Intraocular Foreign Body</title><p>IOFB injuries are relatively complex eye emergencies, necessitating comprehensive treatments and often serial surgeries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref30">30</xref>]. They cause mechanical injury along the track, carry infections, increasing the risk of endophthalmitis, toxic chemical reactions by the retained IOFB, especially with metal IOFBs. Early removal of IOFB is optimal to decrease the risk of endophthalmitis and PVR [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref31">31</xref>]. However, in a study by Colyer et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref32">32</xref>], 54.0% of patients achieved good visual outcomes when the IOFB was removed after a median of 21 days after providing adequate cover with a combination of systemic and topical antibiotics.</p></sec><sec id="s12_7"><title>12.7. Retinal Detachment</title><p>Traumatic R.D may occur due to retinal dialysis, flap tears, giant retinal tears, retinal necrosis. Eyes with trauma and retinal tear are at high risk of PVR and likely to undergo vitrectomy. It can be present at the time of injury or develop post-globe repair, and the incidence varies from 2.5% to 39% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref33">33</xref>]. Longer wound length (&gt;10 mm), vitreous prolapse, vitreous haemorrhage, rupture injury (vs laceration) and retained IOFB are other factors that cause retinal detachment.</p></sec><sec id="s12_8"><title>12.8. Traumatic Hyphema</title><p>Traumatic hyphema involving more than half of the cornea may cause permanent vision loss due to blood-stained cornea or secondary glaucoma causing optic neuropathy. Reactionary bleeding could lead to permanent vision impairment, especially in patients with sickle cell trait/disease. Walton et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref34">34</xref>] recommended routine use of topical cycloplegics and corticosteroids, systemic antifibrinolytic agents or corticosteroids and a rigid shield. They also recommend activity restriction (quiet ambulation) and interdiction of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents. The presence of corneal blood staining or severely elevated IOP after maximal tolerable medicinal treatment are indications for surgery.</p></sec><sec id="s12_9"><title>12.9. Traumatic Optic Neuropathy</title><p>The optic nerve can be compromised either by direct compression due to inflammatory exudate and volume overload with the orbit or axonal swelling post-traumatic inflammation. Another mechanism can be the direct impingement of bony fragments within the optic canal. High dose steroids or orbital decompression is controversial in improving recovery compared with observation, and there are high rates of spontaneous recovery [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref35">35</xref>].</p></sec></sec><sec id="s13"><title>13. Management of Infection/Inflammation</title><sec id="s13_1"><title>13.1. Endophthalmitis</title><p>Post-traumatic endophthalmitis comprises 25% - 30% of all endophthalmitis cases, and it occurs in 3% - 10% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref36">36</xref>] of patients after penetrating injury. This rate changes to 6% - 30% with the presence of an IOFB [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref37">37</xref>]. Early surgical repair and prophylactic systemic intravenous antibiotics for 48 h may reduce this incidence to &lt;1% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref32">32</xref>]. Risk factors include iron-related injuries, severely lacerated eye, retained IOFB, lens capsule injury, and delayed repair. The treatment comprises prompt recognition, intervention such as vitreous tap or vitrectomy followed by intravitreal injection of antibiotics (e.g., vancomycin plus ceftazidime) and systemic therapy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref36">36</xref>]. There is a high incidence of retinal detachment (17% - 58%) and risk of phthisis in eyes with post-traumatic endophthalmitis.</p></sec><sec id="s13_2"><title>13.2. Sympathetic Ophthalmia (SO)</title><p>The time from ocular injury to onset of SO varies greatly, ranging from a few days to decades. 80% of the cases occurred within three months after damage to the exciting eye and 90% within one year [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref38">38</xref>]. Cyclosporine, chlorambucil, cyclophosphamide or azathioprine may also be utilized if the inflammatory reaction cannot be adequately controlled with corticosteroids alone.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s14"><title>14. Postoperative Approach &amp; Follow-Up</title><p>Postoperatively, a multidisciplinary approach to management and follow-up is essential for proper surgical rehabilitation of OGI patients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref39">39</xref>]. A meticulous follow-up and documentation are necessary for the management of eyes with trauma. Recording of IOP, retina status and lens status and corneal sutures monitoring are all critical components in postoperative care of traumatized globe.</p></sec><sec id="s15"><title>15. Medicolegal Issue</title><p>All the clinical and relevant findings and hospital visits should be well documented, timed and dated. This information may stand as substantial evidence in a court of law and in legal cases where compensations are granted against employers, other persons, etc. Proper documentation and decision were taken with the patient’s involvement in general to minimize the risk of future litigations against treating physicians.</p></sec><sec id="s16"><title>16. Controversies Regarding the Management of Ocular Trauma</title><p>Ocular trauma is a matter of unsolved controversies, and management techniques for open-globe injuries are constantly changing. The international classification of ocular trauma is old and should be revised to calculate the outcome more precisely. Ocular adnexa and orbit should be involved in the classification. Covering the eye for corneal abrasion, corneal laceration repair, and therapeutic management of hyphema are all issues in anterior segment trauma. Cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation in the aftermath of trauma are still being argued across the world.</p><p>Regarding posterior segment controversies, early versus late vitrectomy, preoperative application of cryotherapy and a scleral buckle, use of intravitreal antibiotic irrespective of infection, the utility of vitrectomy vs vitreous tap in the case of traumatic endophthalmitis are the issues. The significance of intravenous methylprednisolone in traumatic optic neuropathy is always debatable. The pediatric age group needs to be approached by a different protocol due to the risk of amblyopia, intraocular inflammation, and significant vitreoretinal adhesions. The discussion will give suggestions regarding the management of mechanical eye injuries based on existing published research and the writers’ personal experience.</p></sec><sec id="s17"><title>17. Prevention and Protection of the Eye from Injury</title><p>According to studies and research, 90% of eye injuries are preventable [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113539-ref19">19</xref>]. Wearing safety glasses or goggles whenever you deal with chemicals or around the metal, glass, or other materials that could fly into your eyes is the safest way to safeguard your eyes. Squash and racquetball players must use eye protection. Protect your eyes with a shield affixed to your helmet if you play baseball or football. The children should be kept monitored. Sharp objects like pencils, pens, scissors should be kept away from the child. Because most eye injuries are preventable, emphasis needs to be placed on preventing rather than curing them. It is essential to raise public awareness about the benefits of wearing protective equipment, which is broadly accessible, which was the primary concern of most of the authors who reported on ocular trauma in the previous year.</p></sec><sec id="s18"><title>18. Key Summarization</title><p>1) In ocular trauma, any life-threatening damage should be checked out first.</p><p>2) Determine visual acuity in both eyes with ocular injuries at the time of presentation.</p><p>3) Document all results legibly using clinical photos or diagrammatic depiction, as some instances may be medicolegal.</p><p>4) To avoid misunderstanding in communication, use the worldwide nomenclature and categorization system in ocular trauma eyes.</p><p>5) Because counselling is the mainstay of trauma patient care, physicians must provide patients with tools such as the ocular trauma score, which should be utilized regularly in conjunction with standardized nomenclature for ocular trauma.</p><p>6) In the management of complicated traumatized eyes, a devoted multidisciplinary team is required.</p><p>7) Globe injuries should be handled according to the broad principles of ocular trauma management, and surgical restoration of these eyes should follow the “atraumatic repair” approach.</p></sec><sec id="s19"><title>19. Conclusion</title><p>Traumatic mechanical eye injuries can have substantial morphological and functional consequences on ocular tissue structures. Despite advances in diagnostic and surgical methods, globe rupture frequently results in vision loss. A thorough assessment and an appropriate technique are critical for successful treatment and preserving the final visual outcome.</p></sec><sec id="s20"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We acknowledge Taskin Jamal, PhD. for his active support during the research.</p></sec><sec id="s21"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s22"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Rahman, S., Hossain, A., Alam, S., Rahman, A., Sultana, C., Islam, S., Khan, Y.J. and Amiruzzaman, Md. (2021) Mechanical Eye Trauma Epidemiology, Prognostic Factors, and Management Controversies—An Update. Open Journal of Ophthalmology, 11, 348-363. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojoph.2021.114029</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.113539-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Agrawal, R., et al. (2013) Controversies in Ocular Trauma Classification and Management: Review. International Ophthalmology, 33, 435-445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-012-9698-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wong, T.Y., Klein, B.E. and Klein, R. (2000) The Prevalence and 5-Year Incidence of Ocular Trauma. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology, 107, 2196-2202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00390-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barry, R.J., et al. (2019) The UK Paediatric Ocular Trauma Study 3 (POTS3): Clinical Features and Initial Management of Injuries. Clinical Ophthalmology, 13, 1165-1172. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S201900</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ozturk, T., et al. (2019) Etiology and Visual Prognosis in Open Globe Injuries: Results of a Tertiary Referral Center in Turkey. Scientific Reports, 9, Article No. 17977. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54598-w</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cillino, S., et al. (2008) A Five-Year Retrospective Study of the Epidemiological Characteristics and Visual Outcomes of Patients Hospitalized for Ocular Trauma in a Mediterranean Area. BMC Ophthalmology, 8, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-8-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pandita, A. and Merriman, M. (2012) Ocular Trauma Epidemiology: 10-Year Retrospective Study. New Zealand Medical Journal, 125, 61-69.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jafari, A.K., et al. (2010) Epidemiology and Sociodemographic Aspects of Ocular Traumatic Injuries in Iran. International Ophthalmology, 30, 691-696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-010-9401-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bandrakalli, P., et al. (2012) Prevalence and Causes of Monocular Childhood Blindness in a Rural Population in Southern India. Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology &amp; Strabismus, 49, 303-307. https://doi.org/10.3928/01913913-20120515-03</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">K&amp;#246;mpf, D., Hacke, W. and Hanley, D.F. (1994) Acute Visual Loss—Monocular Blindness. In: Hacke, W., et al., Eds., Neurocritical Care, Springer, Berlin, 344-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-87602-8_33</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fujikawa, A., et al. (2018) Visual Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Open-Globe Injuries. BMC Ophthalmology, 18, 138. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0804-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shah, S.M., et al. (2020) A Prospective Cohort Study on the Epidemiology of Ocular Trauma Associated with Closed-Globe Injuries in Pediatric Age Group. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 68, 500-503. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_463_19</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yang, G.-Q., Xiong, Q.-C. and Wang, L.-L. (2013) Clinical Characteristics, Diagnosis and Treatment of Mechanical Ocular Trauma in 122 Cases. International Eye Science, 13, 1912-1914.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kadappu, S., Silveira, S. and Martin, F. (2013) Aetiology and Outcome of Open and Closed Globe Eye Injuries in Children. Clinical &amp; Experimental Ophthalmology, 41, 427-434. https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.12034</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Singh, R., et al. (2003) Characterization and Causes of Open Globe Injuries among Different Age Groups Presenting to a Tertiary Care Facility. Investigative Ophthalmology &amp; Visual Science, 44, 784-784.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xiao, J.H., et al. (2014) A New Classification for Epidemiological Study of Mechanical Eye Injuries. Chinese Journal of Traumatology, 17, 35-37.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schmidt, G.W., et al. (2008) Vision Survival after Open Globe Injury Predicted by Classification and Regression Tree Analysis. Ophthalmology, 115, 202-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.04.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Agrawal, R., Ho, S.W. and Teoh, S. (2013) Pre-Operative Variables Affecting Final Vision Outcome with a Critical Review of Ocular Trauma Classification for Posterior Open Globe (Zone III) Injury. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 61, 541-545. https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.121066</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ababneh, L.T., et al. (2019) Hospital-Based Ocular Trauma: Factors, Treatment, and Impact Outcome. Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 13, 2119-2126. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S223379</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wagner, P.J. and Lang, G.K. (1996) Mechanical Ocular Trauma. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, 7, 57-64. https://doi.org/10.1097/00055735-199608000-00011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pieramici, D.J., et al. (1997) A System for Classifying Mechanical Injuries of the Eye (Globe). The Ocular Trauma Classification Group. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 123, 820-831. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(14)71132-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yu Wai Man, C. and Steel, D. (2010) Visual Outcome after Open Globe Injury: A Comparison of Two Prognostic Models—The Ocular Trauma Score and the Classification and Regression Tree. Eye (London), 24, 84-89. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2009.16</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kuhn, F., et al. (2006) Epidemiology of Blinding Trauma in the United States Eye Injury Registry. Ophthalmic Epidemiology, 13, 209-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/09286580600665886</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Agrawal, R., Wei, H.S. and Teoh, S. (2012) Predictive Factors for Final Outcome of Severely Traumatized Eyes with No Light Perception. BMC Ophthalmology, 12, 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-12-16</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saeed, A., et al. (2008) Plain X-Ray and Computed Tomography of the Orbit in Cases and Suspected Cases of Intraocular Foreign Body. Eye (London), 22, 1373-1377. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6702876</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, Y., et al. (2009) Tiny Ferromagnetic Intraocular Foreign Bodies Detected by Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Report of Two Cases. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 29, 704-707. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21637</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tyagi, A.K., et al. (1998) Simultaneous Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens Implant Combined with Vitreoretinal Surgery for Intraocular Foreign Body Injuries. Eye (London), 12, 230-233. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1998.55</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cohen, K.L. (2001) Inaccuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation after Traumatic Corneal Laceration and Cataract. Journal of Cataract &amp; Refractive Surgery, 27, 1519-1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(01)00872-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chuang, L.H. and Lai, C.C. (2005) Secondary Intraocular Lens Implantation of Traumatic Cataract in Open-Globe Injury. The Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, 40, 454-459. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-4182(05)80005-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mieler, W.F. and Mittra, R.A. (1997) The Role and Timing of Pars Plana Vitrectomy in Penetrating Ocular Trauma. Archives of Ophthalmology, 115, 1191-1192. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1997.01100160361017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mester, V. and Kuhn, F. (2002) Intraocular Foreign Bodies. Ophthalmology Clinics of North America, 15, 235-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-1549(02)00013-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Greven, C.M., et al. (2000) Intraocular Foreign Bodies: Management, Prognostic Factors, and Visual Outcomes. Ophthalmology, 107, 608-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(99)00134-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Colyer, M.H., et al. (2007) Delayed Intraocular Foreign Body Removal without Endophthalmitis during Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom. Ophthalmology, 114, 1439-1447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.10.052</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lai, W.Y. and Wu, T.T. (2016) Successful Management in a Case of Traumatic Retinal Detachment Due to Open Globe Injury Using Microincisional Vitrectomy. Case Reports in Ophthalmology, 7, 476-480. https://doi.org/10.1159/000450638</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Walton, W., et al. (2002) Management of Traumatic Hyphema. Survey of Ophthalmology, 47, 297-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6257(02)00317-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yu-Wai-Man, P. and Griffiths, P.G. (2005) Surgery for Traumatic Optic Neuropathy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, No. 4, Cd005024. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005024.pub2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Andreoli, C.M., et al. (2009) Low Rate of Endophthalmitis in a Large Series of Open Globe Injuries. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 147, 601-608.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2008.10.023</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lieb, D.F., et al. (2003) Open Globe Injuries with Positive Intraocular Cultures: Factors Influencing Final Visual Acuity Outcomes. Ophthalmology, 110, 1560-1566. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00497-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Goto, H. and Rao, N.A. (1990) Sympathetic Ophthalmia and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada Syndrome. International Ophthalmology Clinics, 30, 279-285. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004397-199030040-00014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113539-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Andreoli, M.T. and Andreoli, C.M. (2012) Surgical Rehabilitation of the Open Globe Injury Patient. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 153, 856-860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.10.013</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>