<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Advances in Entomology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2331-1991</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ae.2022.101001</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AE-113073</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Diversity and Genetic Structuration of Populations of &lt;i&gt;Plutella xylostella&lt;/i&gt; (Lepidoptera, Plutellidae), Cabbage Farming Destroyer in Senegal
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Toffène</surname><given-names>Diome</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mamecor</surname><given-names>Faye</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Marième</surname><given-names>Seck</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Cheikh</surname><given-names>Tidiane Niass</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mbacké</surname><given-names>Sembène</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Genetic Team and Population Management, Department of Animal Biology, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar, Senegal</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Laboratory of Parasitology, Department of Animal Biology, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar, Senegal</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>11</day><month>11</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>13</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>13,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>8,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>11,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   
   Plutella xylostella, pointed out as the most dangerous destroyer of cabbage
    (Brassica olerarea), is a cosmopolitan species. In fact, owing to its large capacity of adaptation, 
   
   P. xylestella colonizes any kind of area. This insect can bring about up to 90% of losses on cabbage farming. To control the insect, Senegalese farmers, very often, resort to high dose of chemical pesticides which are repetitively sprayed. The use of these chemical products gives rise to different varieties of resistant insects, which results in the emergence of different haplotypes between populations. It is in such a context that this study has been undertaken. Our objective is then to contribute to the knowledge of the genetic diversity of 
   
   P. xylostella populations in Senegal. To hit the target, PCR- Sequencing method has been applied on samples from the five following localities: Diofior, Malika, Mboro, Santh Ndong, and Sebikotane. 
   
   P. xylostella from Mboro is genetically different from the other populations. This fact could be due to a different way of using pesticides in this area vis-&#224;-vis of the other localities. On the other hand, between populations of 
   
   P. xylostella from Diofior, Malika, Santh Ndong, and Sebikotane, there is no significant genetic difference. In other respects, phylogenetic trees reveal the existence of two clades: one with individuals from Mboro and the other one with individuals from the other four localities. 
   
   P. xylostella from Mboro distinguishes itself from other populations and then, can be regarded as a sub-population. Thus, the phylogenetic trees reveal the existence of two groups of 
   
   P. xylostella in Senegal. 
  
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Brassica oleracea&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Genetic Diversity</kwd><kwd> Genetic Structure</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Market gardening has become an economic activity efficiently responding to city dwellers nutrition demand. Among market garden produce, cultivation of Brassicaceae is considered, by FAO [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref1">1</xref>], as yielding the utmost important production in the world. Besides, in agro ecosystems, growing one variety of plant on a vast expanse goes naturally with a great increase of plants bio-aggressors, in particular, making crops not marketable. Thus, Brassicaceae cropped in Senegal, notably in the Niayes area, the Senegal River valley, and the “Bassin arachidier”, are imperiled by manifold natural enemies. Among them, Plutellaxylostella is regarded as the most dangerous for Brassicaceae cultivated in the world, especially in the subtropical area [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref3">3</xref>]. It is an insect species confined to this plant family. According to Talekar and Shelton [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref2">2</xref>], verkerk and wright [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref4">4</xref>], it can breed losses assessed up to 90%. In order to control the insect, Senegalese farmers, very often, resort to high dose of chemical pesticides which are repetitively sprayed. This way of fighting against this pest affects human being health and brings the insect to develop resistance. According to Gnago et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref5">5</xref>], caterpillars of the P. xylostella, seem to have developed a certain resistance against the insecticide Kart 500 SP. Odhiambo et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref6">6</xref>] noticed these forms of resistance to insecticides of pyrethrino&#239;d type and DDT (Dichloro-Diphenyl-Trichloro-ethane) too; these are abusively used at high dose by farmers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref2">2</xref>]. The use of these chemical products gives rise to different varieties of resistant insects, which results in the emergence of different haplotypes between populations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref7">7</xref>]. All the pollutants and insecticides are known for their high capacity of generating mutations; this increases the number of mutations in resistant individuals too. According to Pichon et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref8">8</xref>], P. xylostella can be regarded as a species highly polymorphic. This has been confirmed by Marthur et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref9">9</xref>] who indicated a strong genetic diversity in populations of box tree moths from different regions of southern and northern India. Differences in the degree of resistance to insecticides between populations can result from selection of different pressures attributable to the local variation in the way of using insecticides. It is in such a context, that this study has been carried out, to determine the diversity and the genetic structuration of P. xylostella populations in Senegal.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Sampling</title><p>Sampling has been done in Senegal, precisely in five localities of two agro-eco- logical areas. Samples have been taken on field. It consists in collecting larva of P. xylostella living on cabbage plants; see samples on <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Sampled localities and corresponding agro-ecological areas</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sampled localities</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of individuals</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Agro-ecological areas</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malika</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Niayes</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diofior</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bassin arachidier</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mboro</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Niayes</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S&#233;bikotane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Niayes</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Santh Ndong</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Niayes</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. DNA Extraction, Amplification by PCR and Sequencing</title><p>The method was referred to kit Qiagen Dneasy Tissue. The PCR did upon fragments of mitochondrial coding gene: cytochrome b. This gene has been amplified with the help of the primers CB1 (5'-TAT GTA CTA CCA TGA GGA CAA ATA TC-3') and CB2 (5'-ATT ACA CCT CCT AAT TTA TTA GGA AT-3'). Amplification has been dealt with in a reactionary volume of 25 &#181;l consisting of 18.3 &#181;l of water, 2.5 &#181;l of tampon 10&#215;, 1 &#181;l of additional MgCl<sub>2</sub>, 0.5 &#181;l of dNTP, 0.25 &#181;l of each primer, 0.2 &#181;l of taq polymerase, and 2 &#181;l extract from DNA. It is done thanks to a cyclic repetition which ensures a multiplication by 2 of the DNA targets at every cycle. It has been carried out thanks to an equipment called thermo-cycler with the following amplification conditions: initial denaturation at 94˚C for 3 minutes, then 35 cycles of denaturation at 94˚C for 1 minute, followed by 1 minute of hybridation at 47˚C, and a bi t of DNA elongation additional to 72˚C for 1 minute. A final elongation at 72˚C for 10 minutes ends the PCR. Sequencing has been carried out in South Chorea.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Genetic Analysis</title><sec id="s2_3_1"><title>2.3.1. Genetic Variability of Populations</title><p>Analysis of genetic variability parameters such as the number of polymorphic or monomorphic sites, the number of mutations, nucleotidic and haplotydic diversities have been estimated with the software Mega v.5.05 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref10">10</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_2"><title>2.3.2. Genetic Structure</title><p>Genetic distances between P. xylostella populations have been calculated by of Kimura 2 parameters method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref11">11</xref>]. They have been determined thanks to the Mega software v.5.05 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref10">10</xref>]. F<sub>ST</sub> values, in pairs, have been used to estimate the rate of migration by generation; Nm (N, the effective size of the population multiplied by the migration rate, m), based on the relationship balance F<sub>ST</sub> = 1/ (2Nm + 1). This parameter has been determined by the Arlequin software version 3.1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref12">12</xref>]. Molecular variance analysis (Amova), for populations, has been done on alleles’ frequencies basis, using Arlequin 3.1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref12">12</xref>], to prove more the genetic differentiation of the populations of P. xylostella in Senegal. Amova analysis has been implemented using the Arlequin software version 3.1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref12">12</xref>] with 1000 permutations and a significant level of 0.05.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_3"><title>2.3.3. Demographic Evolution</title><p>It is constituted by demo-genetic tests and a Mismatch distribution analysis. To detect expansion signs of the breakdown area ofP. xylostella populations, as well as Tajima D and the fs of Fu tests have been carried out. Moreover, the test Fs of Fu is very sensitive to demographic expansion, which generally founds expression in negative values. These tests have been worked out using Arlequin v. 3.1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref12">12</xref>]. Mismatch distribution graphs are constructed with the help of the DnaSP v. 5.10 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref13">13</xref>]. But the indexes that go with it, particularly SSD and Rag, have been estimated owing to Arlequin v. 3.1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref14">14</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_4"><title>2.3.4. Phylogenetic Relationships Analysis</title><p>For high resolution concern, erection of the phylogenetic trees has been done using two different methods: Neighbor-Joining method where calculation takes into account genetic distances by using the Kimura two parameters method, and the method of maximum probability which even shows us the history of our set of data. Research process of a phylogenetic tree, by using maximum probability, implies finding the typology and the length of the tree’s branches that will give us the highest probability to observe the DNA sequences in our data. The most appropriate model to build this tree is that of GTR added to the law of Gama. These two trees have been built, using Mega software v. 5.05 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref10">10</xref>].</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Genetic Variability</title><p>In a total of two hundred eighty-nine (289) sites, we observed ten (10) mutations, hundred (100) of variable sites which were all informative in parsimony, and two hundred seventy-nine (279) invariable sites. Five (05) haplotypes were recorded, distributed as follows: haplotype 1 gathered five (5) individuals, of which four (04) belonged to the population of P. xylostella from Diofior and one to the population from Malika; as for haplotype 2, it grouped nine (09) individuals of which, one (01) was from Diofior, six (06) from Mboro, and two (02) from S&#233;bikotane; haplotype 3 concerned the individual M17 which was from Malika; remaining individuals were shared between haplotypes 4 and 5. A strong haplotype diversity (0.761 &#177; 0.040) and a weak nucleotide diversity (0.01687 &#177; 0.00134) were noticed in the global sample. Moreover, when we considered separately population from each locality instead of the global one, we remarked that the number of sites of difference varied for each sample, except for the population from Santh Ndong. Value of haplotype and nucleotide diversities was the same with respect to populations considered separately (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>Estimated under the pattern of Tamura-Nei [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref15">15</xref>], substitutions of the transition type (41.84) were lower than substitutions of trans-version one (58.16%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><p>The type of substitution was the same, either it was synonymous or not; consequently, the ratio kns (0.0206)/ks (0.0206) = 1. Among the five haplotypes, one (h2) was shared between three populations: Mboro, Sebikotane, and Diofior; two</p><p>(02) were shared between two populations: h5 between Santh Ndong and S&#233;bikotane, and h1 between Malika and Diofior; haplotypes h3 and h4 were private: H3 was only found in Mboro and h4 in Malika, suggesting a certain degree of isolation between these two populations. Haplotypes h2 and h5 were majority and more abundant in Mboro and Sebikotane. Among the five haplotypes, only one was individual and private; that was haplotype h3, only met in Mboro (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Genetic variability of P. xylostella</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Diofior</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mboro</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Malika</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >S&#233;bikotane</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Santh Ndong</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number sites of difference</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number of haplotypes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Haplotype diversity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4 &#177; 0.237</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3 &#177; 0.196</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4 &#177; 0.237</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4 &#177; 0.169</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average number of nucleotide differences</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00059</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00559</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01518</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nucleotide diversity with JC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.011 &#177; 0.00657</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00059 &#177; 0.00068</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00559 &#177; 0.00328</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01518 &#177; 0.00584</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Rates of different types of substitutions</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >BASE</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >A</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >G</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.73</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Genetic Structure</title><sec id="s3_2_1"><title>3.2.1. Genetic Distances</title><p>In the table below, we noticed that population from Santh Ndong recorded the smallest absolute value of d (0.000), followed by that from Mboro, where we had d = 0.0015, then by those from Malika and Diofior, and finally by that from S&#233;bikotane (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>).</p><p>When we took into consideration the genetic distance between populations, we noticed a certain proximity between P. xylostella population from Diofior with those from Malika, S&#233;bikotane, and Santh Ndong with genetic distances of 0.0166; 0.0127; and 0.0127, respectively. Genetic distances were higher between the population from Mboro and the others. Of all populations, the highest genetic distance, in absolute value, was noticed between Mboro and Santh Ndong, despite their geographic proximity, and the weakest one between Malika and Santh Ndong (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_2"><title>3.2.2. Genetic Differentiation</title><p>It was based on various factors like the Fst mentioned above. Taking into account both the Fst and the p-value (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>), individuals of P. xylostella from Mboro were far from those of Santh Ndong, despite the geographical proximity of the two localities, and those S&#233;bikotane and Malika as well. The genetic differentiation was significant between these different localities (p-value &lt; 0.05), and confirmed the existence of distant genetic groups. On the other hand, between Sebikotane and Diofior, the p-value was non-significant (p-value = 0.24); that showed the existence of closely related populations, with respect to genetic consideration (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_3"><title>3.2.3. Space Analysis of Molecular Variance</title><p>The AMOVA test implemented (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>) allowed us to notice that variation</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Intra population genetic distances</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Localities</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Genetic distance</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Standard error</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diofior</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0149</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0056</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mboro</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0015</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malika</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0063</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0036</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S&#233;bikotane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0183</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0065</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Santh Ndong</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Genetic distances between populations</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Localit&#233;s</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Diofior</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mboro</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Malika</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >S&#233;bikotane</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mboro</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0305</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malika</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0166</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0324</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S&#233;bikotane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0170</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0316</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0153</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Santh Ndong</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0127</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0419</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0094</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0107</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Comparasion of Fst, Nst, Gst and Ks between populations</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Population 1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Population 2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ks</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fst</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Nst</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Gst</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diofior</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mboro</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.41</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diofior</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malika</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diofior</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S&#233;bikotane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.38</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diofior</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Santh_Ndong</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.64</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mboro</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malika</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.49</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mboro</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S&#233;bikotane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.37</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mboro</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Santh Ndong</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.69</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malika</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S&#233;bikotane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malika</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Santh Ndong</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.64</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S&#233;bikotane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Santh Ndong</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison of the p-value of Fst between populations</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Diofior</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mboro</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Malika</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >S&#233;bikotane</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Santh_Ndong</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mboro</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malika</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.038</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S&#233;bikotane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.240</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.184</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Santh Ndong</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.056</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.547</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> Analysis of P. xylostella population structure</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Source of variation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >d.f.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sum of squares</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variance components</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage of variation</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Between populations</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.819</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.68988 Va</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.44</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Within population</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.457</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.06071 Vb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.56</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Fixing Index Fst: 0.61437</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>occurred generally when populations were separately dealt with (variation between populations estimated at 61.44%).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Demographical Evolution</title><sec id="s3_3_1"><title>3.3.1. Demo-Genetic Test</title><p>Tajima D was negative for P. xylostella populations from Diofior, Mboro, and Malika localities, and only significant for Diofior; on the other hand, it was positive and not significant for s&#233;bikotane. Furthermore, the test was nil for the population of P. xylostella from Santh Ndong. For the locality of Mboro, the Fs of Fu was not significant (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_2"><title>3.3.2. Analysis of Mismatch Distribution</title><p>Analysis of Mismatch distribution showed a multimode curve for the global population (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>Comparison table of the SSD or the Sum total of square deviations and the Rg</p><table-wrap id="table9" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref></label><caption><title> Neutrality test</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Diofior</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mboro</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Malika</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >S&#233;bikotane</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Santh Ndong</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >s.d.</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.17432</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.00623</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.09380</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55061</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.54475</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.69388</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >p-value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04290</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23720</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11320</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63280</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40522</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36065</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.67939</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.09474</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.20237</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.05901</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.36921</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.32565</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >p-value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.95630</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22810</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.83320</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99640</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N.A.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N.A.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N.A.</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table10" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>0</label><caption><title> Comparison of SSD and Rg by locality</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Locality</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SSD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P-value</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Rg</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P-value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S&#233;bikotane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Santh Ndong</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diofior</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mboro</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malika</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.213</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>(Index of Irregularity) indicated that P. xylostella populations were composed by some well-differentiated groups. Values of SSD p-value (0.000) were significant (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>0).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Analysis of Phylogenetic Relationships</title><p>The maximum probability tree showed two clades: the first one contained individuals of P. xylostella from four localities, namely: Santh Ndong, S&#233;bikotane, Diofior and Malika. This clade presented a sub-clade only composed of individuals from Malika, and another one containing individuals from Diofior, S&#233;bikotane and Santh Ndong. Individuals from Diofior distinguished themselves from others in this sub-clade. The second clade reassembled all the individuals from Mboro, two from s&#233;bikotane, and one from Diofior (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>In spite of the weakness of our sampling, which was materialized by five populations</p><p>from five localities, with about twenty-nine sequences obtained (29), results revealed the existence of five (05) haplotypes. Our result was really important compared to that found by Saw et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref16">16</xref>], who got only three (03) haplotypes out of forty-two (42) butterflies largely distributed in Australia. Sequence analysis of the mitochondrial gene COI, with 681 pb, from eighty (80) individuals gave sixteen (16) haplotypes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref17">17</xref>]. In China, from ten (10) populations, thirty-two (32) haplotypes were detected in a sample of 149 adults [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref18">18</xref>]. In our study, most of the haplotypes were individually and essentially found in two localities; this could be an evidence of the P. xylostella scattering capacity. This result was akin to</p><p>that of Niu et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref18">18</xref>]. Analysis of the haplotype netting showed that all the two dominant haplotypes were scattered in Mboro and S&#233;bikotane for the first one, and in S&#233;bikotane and Santh Ndong for the other; those four localities belonged to Niayes area. We could then assume the existence of a high rate of migration between Mboro, Santh Ndong and S&#233;bikotane localities. Radar data upheld intense migrations about P. xylostella [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref19">19</xref>], too. Moreover, studies, by Caprio and Tabashnik [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref20">20</xref>] showed that an important proportion of individuals (about 7.8% a day) migrated; the distance could be estimated at about several thousand kilometers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref21">21</xref>]. A strong haplotype and weak nucleotide diversities were noticed in the global sample, too. This is in accordance with Wei et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref22">22</xref>] who showed a big haplotype diversity and a weak nucleotide diversity in populations of P. xylostella in China. In analyzing COI data, Yang et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref23">23</xref>] determined that populations of P. xylostella from China presented a big mitochondrial and nucleotidic haplotypes diversities. The difference observed between our study and that by Yang et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref23">23</xref>] could be explained either by the weak size of our sample, or the short distances between localities in our study. The nucleotide diversity of the Australian populations of P. xylostella was particularly weak unlike that detected in the sample from Kenya [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref16">16</xref>]. The genetic structure showed that P. xylostella population from Mboro was set apart from all other populations, with significant degrees of genetic differentiation. This differentiation may be justified by a local variation of resistance against pesticides. This could be supported by Caprio and Tabashnik results [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref23">23</xref>], which indicated that the local variation about the resistance against insecticides, for the Pyrale of Diamond Hawaii population, was not an indication of a restricted genetic flow, but probably due to a local variation of selection. Other studies revealed that the largest distances between P. xylostella populations reflected probably the mass and the recurrent use of insecticides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref9">9</xref>]. A genetic difference were noticed between strains of P. xylostella that resisted against pesticides and sensitive ones [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref24">24</xref>], but between populations at different temperatures and altitudes, too [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref25">25</xref>]. From information above mentioned, we could assume that P. xylostella populations would have a strong capacity of adaption and resistance against pesticides. Migratory capacities and the increasing resistance to insecticides in many populations, made the management of the species more and more hypothetical [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref10">10</xref>]. However, there was no significant genetic differentiation between P. xylostella populations from Diofior and S&#233;bikotane, on one hand, and those from S&#233;bikotane and Malika, on the other. There would have recurrent exchanges of individuals between these populations, either by migration or more likely by means of marketing. Analysis of the genetic flow ofP. xylostella populations from China, by Wei et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref21">21</xref>], revealed that the number of emigrants, by generation in populations from northern region, wasvery high, whereas that of the southern region was rather weak. With few genetic differentiation (Fst = −0.038, −0.309) and a high rate of females, migration (Nm = 1.117-infinite) between the Chinese populations, suggested that the scattering over long distances was a factor of demography of this species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref17">17</xref>]. Molecular variance analysis showed that 61.44% of variation was due to a variation between populations (localities). That further consolidated the assumption that P. xylostella populations were structured according to pressure from pesticides. In contrast, our results were not in accordance with those of Roux et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref9">9</xref>] who found that most of variability occurred within populations themselves (AMOVA: 73.71%). Mismatch neutrality tests revealed that the population of P. xylostella in Senegal were stable. Phylogenetic trees showed the existence of two clades with a discrimination of individuals from Mboro in one of the clades; which one’s more pointed out the peculiarity of that population. In the other clade, populations split up in two sub-clades. These two clades revealed the presence of two groups of P. xylostella in Senegal. Our results, were in agreement with those of Wei et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113073-ref21">21</xref>] who indicated the existence of two groups of Diamond ringworm in China and worldwide.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Diome, T., Faye, M., Seck, M., Niass, C.T. and Semb&#232;ne, M. (2022) Diversity and Genetic Structuration of Populations of Plutellaxylostella (Lepidoptera, Plutellidae), Cabbage Farming Des- troyer in Senegal. Advances in Entomology, 10, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.4236/ae.2022.101001</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.113073-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2012) Utilisation de Bacillus thuringiensis contre Plutella xylostella en culture dechou et Phthorimaea operculella en stockage de pomme de terre. Fiche technique. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. https://www.fao.org/3/az788f/az788f.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113073-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Talekar, N.S. and Shelton, A.M. (1993) Biology, Ecology and Management of the Diamond Back Moth. Annual Review of Entomology, 38, 275-230. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.38.010193.001423</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113073-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Furlong, M.J., Wright, D.J. and Dosdall, L.M. (2013) Diamondback Moth Ecology and Management: Problems, Progress and Prospects. Annual Review of Entomology, 58, 517-541. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153605</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113073-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Verkerk, R.H.J. and Wright, D.J. (1996) Multitrophic Interactions and Management of the Diamondback Moth: A Review. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 86, 205-216. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485300052482</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113073-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gnago, J.A., Danho, M. and Agneroh, T.A. (2010) Efficacité des extraits de neem (Azadirachta indica) et de papayer (Carica papaya) dans la lutte contre les insectes ravageurs du gombo (Abelmoschus esculentus) et du chou (Brassica oleracea) en C&amp;ocirc;te d’Ivoire. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 4, 953-966. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v4i4.63035</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113073-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Odhiambo, J.A.O., Gbewonyo, W.S.K., Obeng-Ofori, D., Wilson, M.D., Boakye, D.A. and Brown, C. (2010) Resistance of Diamondback Moth to Insecticides in Selected Cabbage Farms in Southern Ghana. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 4, 1397-1409. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v4i5.65524</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113073-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Roux, O., Gevrey, M., Arvanitakis, L., Gers, C., Bordat, D. and Legal, L. (2007) ISSR-PCR: Tool for Discrimination and Genetic Structure Analysis of Plutella xylostella Population Native to Different Geographical Areas. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 43, 240-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2006.09.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113073-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pichon, A. (1999) Caractérisation biologique et génétique de cinq populations d’origines géographiques différentes de Plutella xylostella (L.), Lepidoptera Yponomeutidae. Mémoire DEA Université de Rennes I, Rennes, 33p. https://agritrop.cirad.fr/300491/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113073-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Murthy, M.S., Sannaveerppanavar, V.T. and Shankarappa, K.S. (2014) Genetic Diversity of Diamondback Moth, Plutella xylostella L. (Yponomeutidae: Lepidoptera) Populations in Indi a Using RAPD Markers. Journal of Entomology, 11, 95-101. https://doi.org/10.3923/je.2014.95.101</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113073-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tamura, K., Peterson, D., Peterson, N., Stecher, G., Nei, M. and Kumar, S. (2011) MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 28, 2731-2739. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msr121</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113073-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kimura, M. (1980) A Simple Method for Estimating Evolutionary Rate of Base Substitution through Comparative Studies of Nucleotide Sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 16, 111-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731581</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113073-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Excoffier, L., Laval, G. and Schneider, S. (2005) Arlequin Ver. 3.1: An Integrated Software Package for Population Genetics Data Analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online, 1, 47-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/117693430500100003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113073-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Librado, P. and Rozas, J. (2009) DnaSP v5: A Software for Comprehensive Analysis of DNA Polymorphism Data. Bioinformatics, 25, 1451-1452. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113073-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Excoffier, L., Smouse, P.E. and Quattro, J.M. (2006) Analysis of Molecular Variance Inferred from Metric Distances among DNA Haplotypes: Application to Human Mitochondrial DNA Restriction Data. Genetics, 131, 479-491. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/131.2.479</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113073-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tamura, K. and Nei, M. (1993) Estimation of the Number of Nucleotide Substitutions in the Control Region of Mitochondrial DNA in Humans and Chimpanzees. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 10, 512-526.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113073-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saw, J., Endersby, N.M. and Mckechnie, S.W. (2006) Low mtDNA Diversity among Widespread Australian Diamondback Moth Plutella xylostella (L.) Suggests Isolation and a Founder Effect. Insect Science, 13, 365-373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7917.2006.00105.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113073-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, J., Zhao, F., Choi, Y.S., Kim, I., Sohn, H.D. and Jin, B.R. (2006) Genetic Variation in the Diamondback Moth, Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae) in China Inferred from Mitochondrial COI Gene Sequence. European Journal of Entomology, 103, 605-611. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2006.081</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113073-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Niu, Y.Q., Nansen, C., Li, X.W. and Liu T.X. (2014) Geographical Variation of Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) Populations Revealed by Mitochondrial COI Gene in China. Journal of Applied Entomology, 138, 692-700. https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12130</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113073-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chapman, J.W., Reynolds, D.R., Smith, A., Riley, J., Pedgley, D.E. and Woiwod I.P. (2004) High-Altitude Migration of the Diamondback Moth Plutella xylostella to the U.K.: A Study Using Radar, Aeral Netting, and Ground Trapping. Ecological Entomology, 27, 641-650. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2311.2002.00472.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113073-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Caprion, M.A. and Tabashnik A.E. (1992) Allozymes Used to Estimate Gene Flow among Populations of Diamondback Moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) in Hawaii. Entomological Society of America, 21, 808-816. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/21.4.808</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113073-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lorimer</surname><given-names> R.I. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1981</year>)<article-title>Lepidoptera Immigrants to Orkney in 1890</article-title><source> Proceedings and transactions of the British Entomological and Natural History Society</source><volume> 14</volume>,<fpage> 108</fpage>-<lpage>109</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113073-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wei, S.J., Shi, B.C., Gong, Y.J., Jin G.H., Chen X.X. and Meng X.F. (2013) Genetic Structure and Demographic History Reveal Migration of the Diamondback Moth Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) from the Southern to Northern Regions of China. PLOS ONE, 8, Article ID: e59654. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059654</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113073-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yang J., Tian L., Xu, B., Xi W., Wang S., Zhang, Y., Wang X. and Wu Q. (2004) Insight into the Migration Routes of Plutella xylostella in China Using mtCOI and ISSR Markers. PLoS ONE, 10, Article ID: e0130905. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130905</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113073-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Herrero, S., Ferre, J. and Escriche, B. (2001) Mannose Phosphate Isomerase Isoenzymesin Plutella xylostella Support Common Genetic Bases of Resistance to Bacillus Thuringiensistoxins in Lepidopteran Species. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 67, 979-981. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.67.2.979-981.2001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113073-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Heckel, D., Gahan, L., Tabashnik, B. and Johnson, M. (1995) Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA Differences between Strains of Diamondback Moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) Susceptible or Resistant to Bacillus Thuringiensis. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 88, 531-537. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/88.4.531</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>