<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ENG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Engineering</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1947-3931</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/eng.2020.128039</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ENG-102273</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Engineering</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Research on Wheel Rail Wear for a 140 t Open Type Hot Metal Car
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bo</surname><given-names>Feng</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sumei</surname><given-names>Jia</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Guosheng</surname><given-names>Feng</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>School of Mechanical Engineering, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>HCIG Communication Investment Co. Ltd., Shijiazhuang, China</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>14</day><month>08</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>08</issue><fpage>563</fpage><lpage>580</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>13,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2020</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>16,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2020</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>19,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  To maintain the safety of an open-type hot-metal car and to reduce wheel-rail wear during transportation, simulation models of the main components of such car were built using Pro/E software and then tested. In particular, the Pro/E models were imported into ADAMS/Rail for assembly and then used to construct a complete hot-metal car dynamic model. Locomotive wheel-rail attack angle, wheel-rail lateral force, and wear index were used as evaluation parameters during the simulation to analyze the effects of bogie parameter, rail parameter, and speed of the hot-metal car on wheel-rail wear. An improvement scheme for reducing wheel-rail wear was proposed based on the result of the dynamic simulation, wherein wheel-rail wear and curving performance were analyzed and compared. The simulation provided an important reference for evaluating and improving the dynamic performance of the hot-metal car. The applied effect showed that the improvement scheme is effective.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Hot-Metal Car</kwd><kwd> ADAMS/Rail</kwd><kwd> Dynamic Simulation</kwd><kwd> Wheel and Rail Wear</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>A hot-metal car is a special vehicle for transporting hot iron for iron works. With the rapid development of the steel industry, fundamental standards for hot-metal cars have been established in terms of safety, efficiency, and load capacity. Steel manufacturers aim to further develop hot-metal cars. The advantages of appropriate capacity, low cost, huge market demand, and technical difficulty have made hot-metal cars with the 140 t capacity the most competitive in the market. A hot-metal car has several limiting factors, such as its structure, the workshop building area of the steel manufacturer, the transport line, as well as the high temperature and liquid features of hot metal. These factors can cause numerous problems in transporting hot iron, such as low speed, heavy axle load, short interval distance without breakdown, bad curving performance, and bad wheel rim wear. In the example presented in this paper, the wear between the wheel and the rail has damaged a 140 t open hot-metal car, causing it to derail during transportation.</p><p>To solve these problems, V. P. Piptyuk and V. F. Polyakov et al. conducted research on the fluid dynamics of melting metal in a 350 t hot metal car using a numerical method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102273-ref1">1</xref>]. A. G. Belkovskii and Ya. L. Kats proposed a mathematical model of temperature change in a hot-metal car while filling the car with red-hot semi-finished products [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102273-ref2">2</xref>]. Through analysis and comparison of the production efficiency and heat loss, D. N. Makarov et al. drew the conclusion that a 140 t hot-metal car outperforms a 100 t hot-metal car [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102273-ref3">3</xref>]. M. Ignesti et al. developed a wear model for predicting wheel-and-rail profile evolution in railway systems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102273-ref4">4</xref>]. J. Pombo et al. studied the wear evaluation of railway wheels based on multi-body dynamics and wear computation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102273-ref5">5</xref>]. A. A. Shabana et al. developed an elastic force model for wheel/rail contact problems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102273-ref6">6</xref>]. E. Meli et al. determined wheel-rail contact points using semi-analytical methods and compared classical with neural network-based procedures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102273-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102273-ref8">8</xref>]. Xie Suming, Chang Liangwei, and other Chinese scholars researched the operation stability and curving performance of hot-metal cars using dynamic simulation software such as ADAMS/Rail and SIMPACK [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102273-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102273-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102273-ref11">11</xref>]. However, only a few scholars had investigated the wear of a three-axle bogie hot-metal car under special circumstances such as low speed, heavy load, small curve radius, and super-elevation. Using Pro/E and ADAMS/Rail, the authors of the present study conducted a dynamic simulation of a 140t open hot-metal car and analyzed its wear, which is associated with the relevant parameters of the car and the rail. The authors then proposed a low-wear solution, which provides references for evaluating and improving the performance of a hot-metal car.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Establishing the Complete Car Model</title><p>The 140 t open hot-metal car used in this study consisted of a hot-metal pot, a car frame, and two three-axle bogies, which differ from traditional bogies. This three-axle bogie (modified 110-G type) is made up of a side-frame suit and a swing bolster. The side-frame suit contains a universal two-axle bogie and an additional one-axle bogie, which are connected by a bolt. This design does not only guarantee sufficient strength but also cuts down raw material costs and makes part replacement convenient. The bogie design is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p><p>The Pro/E models of all components were initially established according to the product drawing of the manufacturer. The car frame was used to sustain the load and transmit traction force while simultaneously serving as the fixing foundation of the entire car. The car frame is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> illustrates the bogie system after importing the Pro/E model into ADAMS/Rail. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> shows the complete dynamic model of the car. The technical parameters of the 140 t open hot-metal car are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>The rationality of the model can be verified by comparing the calculated weight of the Pro/E model with the measured value on the computer-aided design drawings of the manufacturer. The wheel set, car frame, side frame, hot-metal pot, and axle box clearly have almost identical weights, as shown as in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>The bolster had a complex structure, thus, some of its parts were simplified, and weight errors were in a small extent of engineering acceptable. The car can carry 140 t of hot metal because iron slag may be present in the smelting hot iron, the density of which is 2300 kg/m<sup>3</sup>. However, iron slag content cannot be</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> The 140 t open hot metal car’s technical parameters</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Numerical value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Length of vehicle</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9660 (mm)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maximum height</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4550 (mm)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rigid wheel base</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1300 (mm)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Distance between bogie centre</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5380 (mm)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Distance between side frame</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2040 (mm)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Distance between center plates</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5380 (mm)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Distance between side bearing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1500 (mm)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Axial length</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2250 (mm)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diameter of wheel tread</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >650 (mm)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mass of single round</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.993 (t)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mass of body</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >187.15 (t)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mass of bogie</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.056 (t)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mass of frame</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.35 (t)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Capacity of hot-metal bottle</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >140 (t)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gross weight of melted iron and pot</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >170 (t)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Axle load</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34 (t)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spring stiffness of bogie</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.06 (kN/mm)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spring deflection of bogie</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 (mm)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Track gauge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1435 (mm)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Minimum radius of curvature</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100 (m)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maximum running speed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 (km/h)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>measured accurately. Based on a conservative calculation and assuming that the liquid level was 2.1 m high and its density was 7138 kg/m<sup>3</sup>, we estimated that the hot iron weight was 146 t, and that the distance between the gravity center of the hot iron and rail surface was 2.35 m. The rotational inertias of the main parts are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Contrast of main parts basic parameters of hot-metal-car (kg)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Name of parts</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Measured weight</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Calculating weight</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A wheel-set</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >993</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >996</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Frame</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16,350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16,250</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ladle (including firebrick)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30,000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29,500</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Side frame 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >492</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >470</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Side framer 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1105</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1080</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bolster</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2610</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2808</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Molten iron</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >140,000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >142,000</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Rotational inertias of main parts (kg∙m<sup>2</sup>)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parts name</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >X axis rotational inertia</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Y axis rotational inertia</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Z axis rotational inertia</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Car body</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >321,500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >408,600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >406,800</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Side frame</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >647</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >697</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Swing bolster</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >845</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >678</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1439</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wheel set</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >471</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >471</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Effect of Bogie-Related Parameters on Wheel-Rail Wear</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Friction Coefficients of the Center Plate and Side Bearing</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> shows the effects of the friction coefficients between the bogie center plate and the side bearings on wheel-rail wear in the multibody model. According to the actual operating state, the curve length of 300 m and operating speed of 15 km/h were defined as the baseline simulation case. Track irregularity was generally described by power spectrum density. Different values of the track spectrum could be obtained via field measurements of line conditions. The line conditions were divided into six levels.</p><p>The first level was the worst, whereas the sixth level was the best. The hot-metal car was operated in the manufacturing workshop, and the main influencing factor on track irregularity was wheel-rail wear. According to the actual measurements record, track spectrum level 5 was selected [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102273-ref12">12</xref>]. The center plate and side-bearing contact frame were directly determined to be partially worn. Friction coefficients were set as 0.4, 0.3, 0.2, and 0.1. The friction coefficient 0.2 was provided by the manufacturer. The other friction coefficients were used for simulation comparison. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> shows that the curve of the wheel-rail wear changed with the friction coefficient of the center plate and side bearing. Increasing friction coefficient caused the wheel-rail creep forces and wear index to increase as well. In here [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102273-ref13">13</xref>],</p><p>W = F x ε x + F y ε y (1)</p><p>W —wear index;</p><p>F x —the longitudinal force of wheel-rail;</p><p>ε x —the longitudinal creepage;</p><p>F y —the lateral force of wheel-rail;</p><p>ε y —the lateral creepage.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Axle Box Positioning Size</title><p>The position of the axle box in the modified bogie can be determined by the guide frame. When the longitudinal clearance of the original car stop was set to 10 mm, the lateral clearances were set to 15 mm (condition 1), 10 mm (condition 2), and 5 mm (condition 3). When the lateral clearance was set to 10 mm, the longitudinal clearances were set to 15 mm (condition 4) and 5 mm (condition 5). The clearance of side frame guide is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>.</p><p>Using the aforementioned parameters, the simulation of the effects of the longitudinal and lateral clearances between the side-frame box and guiding frame on wheel-rail wear was conducted. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> shows that when the lateral clearance increased by 5 mm, the wear index of the guide wheel set decreased by 1.7%;</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Clearance of side frame guide</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Working condition</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Lateral clearance (mm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Longitudinal clearance (mm)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Working condition 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Working condition 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Working condition 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Working condition 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Working condition 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>however, when the lateral clearance decreased by 5 mm, the wear index of the guide wheel set increased by 2.6%. When the longitudinal clearance increased by 5 mm, the wear index of the wheel set decreased by 10%, which is greater than the wear index when the longitudinal clearance decreased by 5 mm. The simulation results show that increasing the longitudinal and lateral clearances of the side-frame box is helpful in reducing the wheel-rail wear index and that the effect of longitudinal clearance on wheel-rail wear is greater than that of lateral clearance. Therefore, to satisfy the design requirements of the entire vehicle, increasing the position clearance appropriately will help reduce wheel-rail wear [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102273-ref13">13</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Vertical Stiffness of the Spring</title><p>The bogie spring device of the hot-metal car is responsible for reducing vehicle vibration and impact caused by uneven lines, wheel scratches, and elliptical wheels. Therefore, selecting the appropriate spring stiffness can effectively reduce the interaction between the wheel and the rail, improve the stability of vehicle operation, guarantee the safety of goods during transportation, and extend the life of the vehicle. Three spring stiffness values due to constructive criteria, namely, 10, 12, and 14 kN/mm, were selected for the simulation. The spring stiffness of 12 kN/mm was an approximate value of 12.06 kN/mm that was provided by the manufacturer. The spring stiffness values of 10 kN/mm and 14 kN/mm were used for comparison. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref> shows that the curve of wheel-rail wear changed with spring stiffness value.</p><p>The simulation results show that wheel-rail lateral force, wheel-set attack angle, and wheel-rail wear exhibited a negligible increase with the increase in the vertical stiffness of the spring. That is, changes in vertical stiffness have minimal effect on wheel-rail wear.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Effects of Orbital Parameters on Wheel-Rail Wear</title><p>Hot-metal cars used in the metallurgical industry mainly travel between the blast furnace and steel-making furnace. Such cars have a short running distance, low speed, and huge loading capacity; however, they lack a standard track design compared with railway freight trains. This limitation significantly affects the safety of hot-metal transportation. Therefore, the effects of orbital parameters on wheel-rail wear must be investigated.</p><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Length of Transition Curve</title><p>In the dynamic analysis of the hot-metal car, various indices exhibited a sudden increase at the junction of the transition and circular curves because the vehicle there were impact between the wheels of the vehicle and the rail, which seriously affected the curving performance of the hot-metal car and threatened the safety of hot-metal transportation. To analyze the effect of different lengths of transition curve on wheel-rail impact, the lengths of 20, 30, and 40 m were set as conditions 1, 2, and 3, respectively.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref> shows that the effect of extending the transition curve on the wheel-rail attack angle was minimal. In addition, the maximum wheel-rail lateral force did not evidently change. However, lateral wheel-rail forces gradually decreased at the junction of the transition and circular curves. Moreover, the effect on the vehicle system gradually weakened. Such finding is consistent with the results of theoretical deduction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102273-ref14">14</xref>]. With a longer transition curve, the maximum of the wheel-rail wear index decreased and the amplitude of vibration decreased, however these effects are smaller. Thus, extending the transition curve is beneficial in reducing wheel-rail impact; however, its effect on wheel-rail wear remains unclear.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Curve Radius</title><p>As the main geometric parameter of a curve, curve radius has a decisive effect on vehicle curving performance. The curve radius of the running line of the hot-metal car is limited, thus, the curve radii of 100, 150, and 200 m were respectively set as conditions 1, 2, and 3 to analyze the effect of different curve radius on wheel-rail wear. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0 shows that as the curve radius increased from 100 m to 150 m, the wheel-rail attack angle decreased to nearly half of the primitive value, and the wheel-rail wear index evidently decreased by 62.5%. As the curve radius increased from 150 m to 200 m, the rate of overall wear slowed down.</p><p>The simulations showed that increasing the curve radius can effectively reduce wheel-rail wear of the vehicle system. Therefore, the curve radius should be increased if the workshop building area would permit it.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Operating Speed</title><p>The operating speed of a hot-metal car directly affects the efficiency of transporting molten iron. When the vehicle runs into curves, excessive speed will result in increased wear or even derailment. Operating speeds of 3.5, 4.0, and 4.5 m/s were respectively set as conditions 1, 2, and 3 to analyze the effect of different operating speeds on wheel-rail wear.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1 shows that the duration of attack angle, lateral force and wear index of the wheel-rail decreased with increasing speed, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1(b) showed that the trend of the wheel-rail attack angle was moderate changing.</p><p>Thus indicating that the effect of vehicle speed on the wheel-rail attack angle and wheel-rail lateral force was relatively small, whereas the wear index of the wheel-rail increased with increasing speed. Increasing speed resulted in more serious wheel-rail wear based on the simulation calculations.</p></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. Super-Elevation</title><p>The super-elevation is an orbital parameter. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2 shows that super-elevation had a negligible effect on the wheel-rail attack angle of the hot-metal car and had a</p><p>certain effect on wheel-rail lateral force. Lateral forces tend to decrease with increasing super-elevation, thus reducing the wear index of the wheel-rail. Based on this finding, an appropriate increase in super-elevation can reduce wheel-rail wear. A feasible option for manufacturers is to change existing curve lines.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Improvement Scheme for Reducing Wheel-Rail Wear</title><p>By considering the simulation result of the bogie and the relevant track parameters for wheel-rail wear, using the optimization tools of design of experiment in ADAMS facilitated the proposal of improvement measures, which include adopting a double-acting roller elastic side bearing, increasing the lateral and longitudinal clearances of the side-frame box guide, and increasing curve super-elevation, etc. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102273-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102273-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102273-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102273-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.102273-ref19">19</xref>]. Experiment design may analyse the change of multi-design variable simultaneously. The change condition of objective function was studied when the value of these design variable was divided into groups according to different combinations. The proposed improvement scheme is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>. The applied effect showed that the improvement scheme significantly affected various parameters of wheel-rail wear. The specific numerical values are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>. The computational times is 205 seconds and the memory consumption is 25% of the new model in HPD03FS72 workstation.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3 shows the effect of the original and improved scheme on wheel-rail wear.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref> shows that the maximum attack angle of the rear-wheel set decreased from the original 1.02 rad to 0.88 rad. Furthermore, the wheel-rail lateral force and wear index were evidently decreased after the improvement scheme was implemented, in which the wear index significantly decreased by 24.9% from the original 3820 N to 2870 N. These changes show that the improvement scheme effectively reduced the attack angle of the wheel set and obviously decreased wheel-rail wear. Moreover, the improvement scheme caused the derailment coefficient of the vehicle system, defined as the lateral force of the wheel divided by the vertical force of the wheel, to decrease by 5.7% from the original 0.601 to 0.567. The reduction rate of the wheel weight, defined as the reduction of the wheel weight divided by the wheel weight, decreased by 14.7%. These data show that the curving performance of the hot-metal car improved considerably.</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> The comparison between original scheme and improvement scheme</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Scheme</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Constant-contact elastic side bearing friction coefficient</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Side frame box guide one side lateral clearance/mm</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Side frame box guide one side vertical clearance/mm</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Curve superelevation/mm</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Original value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Optimized value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> The comparison of vehicle performance</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Scheme</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Wheel set attack angle/rad</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Wheel-rail lateral force/N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Wear index/N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Derailment coefficient</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Reducing rate of the wheel weight</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Original value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8e5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3820</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.601</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Optimized Value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.625e5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2870</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.567</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Reduced rate/%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Moreover, when the vehicle ran on the circular curve, the vibration amplitude of the load reduction rate evidently decreased. This observation indicates that snake movement significantly weakened in the circular curve. Thus, the improvement scheme can effectively increase the curving performance of the vehicle system.</p><p>In addition, the simulation analysis showed that the top speed in the original scheme was 4.8 m/s (17.28 km/h), whereas the top speed reached 5.9 m/s (21.24 km/h) after the improvement scheme was applied. Such improvement in running speed can increase transport efficiency. After the improvement scheme is adopted, the vehicles manufactured are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>4. The actual vehicle test was completed on the track with the curve super-elevation of 18 mm.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusions</title><p>1) In this study, the authors established the Pro/E model for a 140 t open-type hot-metal car. The rotational inertias of all components of the hot-metal car were calculated. The Pro/E model was imported into ADAMS/Rail to construct a dynamic model for the entire vehicle.</p><p>2) Through the simulation analysis of multiple dynamics, the effects of bogie and wheel-rail parameters on wheel wear were discussed. Among all the parameters of the bogie, the clearance of the side-frame box guide had a significant effect on wheel-rail wear. Spring vertical rigidity values, as well as the friction coefficients of the center plate and side bearing, had negligible effects on wheel-rail wear. Among all track parameters, curve radius was the most significant factor. Transition curve, running speed, and curve super-elevation all affected wheel-rail wear to a certain extent.</p><p>3) Based on the combined influence degrees of all parameters on wheel-rail wear the actual experience of the manufacturer, an improvement scheme for reducing the friction coefficient of the side bearing, as well as for increasing the clearance of the side-frame box guide and curve super-elevation, was proposed. The applied effect showed that the improvement scheme not only reduced wheel-rail wear and improved curving performance, but also increased top speed, which could increase the transportation efficiency of a hot-metal car.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This project was supported by the National Nature Science Fund of China (Grant No.11272220).</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Feng, B., Jia, S.M. and Feng, G.S. (2020) Research on Wheel Rail Wear for a 140 t Open Type Hot Metal Car. Engineering, 12, 563-580. https://doi.org/10.4236/eng.2020.128039</p></sec><sec id="s10"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.102273-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Piptyuk, V.P., Polyakov, V.F. and Samokhvalov, S.E. (2009) Study of Hydrodynamics of a 350-Ton Ladle Bath during the Treatment of Steel on a Ladle-Furnace Unit. Metallurgist, 53, 679-684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11015-010-9232-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102273-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Belkovskii, A.G. and Kats, Ya.L. (2009) Mathematical Model of the Cooling of Steel in Small Ladle. Metallurgist, 53, 261-273.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11015-009-9172-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102273-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Makarov, D.N., Gorbachev, Yu.P. and Andreev, V.A. (2007) Use of 140-Ton Ladle to Transport Liquid Pig Iron. Metallurgist, 51, 486-488.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11015-007-0086-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102273-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ignesti, M., Malvezzi, M., Marini, L., Meli, E. and Rindi, A. (2012) Development of a Wear Model for the Prediction of Wheel and Rail Profile Evolution in Railway Systems. Wear, 284-285, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2012.01.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102273-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pombo, J., Ambrosio, J., Pereira, M., Lewis, R., Dwyer-Joyce, R., Ariaudo, C. and Kuka, N. (2010) A Study on Wear Evaluation of Railway Wheels Based on Multibody Dynamics and Wear Computation. Multibody System Dynamics, 24, 347-366.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-010-9217-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102273-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shabana, A.A., Zaazaa, K.E., Escalona, J.L. and Sanyc, J.R. (2004) Development of Elastic Force Model for Wheel/Rail Contact Problems. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 269, 295-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00074-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102273-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Meli, E., Falomi, S., Malvezzi, M. and Rindi, A. (2008) Determination of Wheel-Rail Contact Points with Semianalytic Methods. Multibody System Dynamics, 20, 327-358.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102273-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Meli, E., Falomi, S., Malvezzi, M. and Rindi, A. (2005) Determination of Wheel-Rail Contact Points: Comparison between Classical and Neural Network Based Procedures. Meccanica, 44, 661-686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-009-9202-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102273-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xie, S.M., Yue, L.H. and Gao, Y. (2007) Based on Firm-Soft Mixture Model 300T Hot-Metal Car Dynamics Simulation. Computer Simulation, No. 24, 270-273.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102273-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, L.W., Li, F. and Huang, Y.H. (2009) Analysis on Special Molten Iron Tanker Curve Negotiation and Ride Performance. Railway Locomotive and Car, No. 29, 35-37.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102273-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, W.D., Mo, X.H. and Peng, J.S. (2007) Based on ADAMS the Hydraulic Plate Molten Iron Charter Dynamics Simulation. Special Purpose Motor Vehicle, No. 10, 35-38.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102273-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhai, W.M. (2012) Vehicle-Rail Coupling Dynamics. Science Press, Beijing.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102273-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, C. (2011) Research on the Molten Iron Car Wheel Wear. Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102273-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yan, J.M. and Fu, M.H. (2012) Vehicle Engineering. China Railway Publishing House, Beijing.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102273-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tao, G.Q., Wen, Z.F. and Guan, Q.H. (2003) Locomotive Wheel Wear Simulation in Complex Environment of Wheel-Rail Interface. Wear, 430-431, 214-221.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2019.05.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102273-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ignesti, M. (2014) Development of a Model for the Simultaneous Analysis of Wheel and Rail Wear in Railway Systems. Multibody System Dynamics, 31, 191-240.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-013-9360-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102273-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yang, G.X., Zhao, F.W. and Li, Q.Z. (2019) Study of Influences of High-Speed Train Wheel-Rail Contact Geometric Parameters on Wheel-Rail Wear. Journal of the China Railway Society, 41, 50-56.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102273-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, P., Wang, L. and Shabana, A.A. (2017) Influence of Rail Flexibility in a Wheel/Rail Wear Prediction Model. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 231, 57-74.  
https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409715618426</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.102273-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Magel, E. and Kalousek, J. (2017) Designing and Assessing Wheel/Rail Profiles for Improved Rolling Contact Fatigue and Wear Performance. Engineers Part F Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 231, 805-818. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409717708079</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>