<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">PP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Pharmacology &amp; Pharmacy</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2157-9423</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/pp.2020.117013</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">PP-101413</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Flavonoids from the Leaves of &lt;i&gt;Bridelia stipularis&lt;/i&gt; with &lt;i&gt;in Vitro&lt;/i&gt; Antioxidant and Cytotoxicity Activity
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sangita</surname><given-names>Debnath Puja</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kazi</surname><given-names>Ruhullah Shahriar</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Choudhury</surname><given-names>Mahmood Hasan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Monira</surname><given-names>Ahsan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Pharmacy, State University of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>13</day><month>07</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>137</fpage><lpage>146</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>4,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2020</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>7,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2020</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>10,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Methanolic extract of the leaves of 
  Bridelia stipularis
   was studied. From this 
  study, we isolated three known flavonoids. They were identified as 7-O-methyl
   luteolin, apigenin and 5, 7, 2’, 5’ tetrahydroxyflavone by NMR spectroscopic studies. All of them are first time documented for this plant. Different solvent fractions were subjected to 
  in vitro
   antioxidant and cytotoxicity studies. Both apigenin and ethyl acetate soluble fraction of 
  Bridelia stipularis
   showed strong antioxidant activity having IC
  <sub>50</sub>
   value of 8.005, 8.77 μg/mL respectively. Chloroform soluble fraction of 
  Bridelia stipularis
   exerted 
  the 
  highest toxicity to brine shrimp and petroleum ether soluble fraction showed moderate toxicity having LC<sub>50</sub> value of 1.05, 1.71 μg/mL respectively.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Bridelia stipularis&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Flavonoid</kwd><kwd> Antioxidant</kwd><kwd> Cytotoxicity</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Currently in the developing world, about 25% of ingredients in the prescribed modern medicine are derived from the extracts of medicinal plant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101413-ref1">1</xref>]. A wide range of drugs are derived from natural origins e.g. atropine from Atropa belladonna, camphor from Cumanmomum camphora, digoxin from Digitalis purpurea, and quinine from Cinchona succirubra, etc. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101413-ref2">2</xref>]. So phytochemical research is achieving crucial significance especially for third world countries.</p><p>Bridelia is a plant genus of the family Phyllanthaceae first described as a genus in 1806 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101413-ref3">3</xref>]. Approximately it includes 60 - 70 species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101413-ref4">4</xref>]. Bridelia stipularis (L) Blume is a climbing shrub, which grows in shady, moist forest floors (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>)</p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101413-ref5">5</xref>]. The plant is distributed in Tropical Africa, Madagaskar, Yemen and in different areas of Asia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101413-ref5">5</xref>]. In Bangladesh, it is known as Harinhara, Pat Khowi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101413-ref5">5</xref>] and Bangari gach [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101413-ref6">6</xref>]. Bioactive steroid and triterpenoids have been identified from the methanolic extract of stem bark of Bridelia stipularis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101413-ref4">4</xref>]. Bridelyl alcohol and a phlobatanin were isolated from leaves while taraxenone was isolated from the hexane extract of roots of Bridelia stipularis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101413-ref5">5</xref>]. A wide range of biological activities have been also reported by Bridelia stipularis e.g. antibacterial and antifungal activity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101413-ref7">7</xref>], anti-candidal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101413-ref8">8</xref>], antioxidant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101413-ref9">9</xref>], anti-diabetic [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101413-ref10">10</xref>], cytotoxicity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101413-ref7">7</xref>] and thrombolytic [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101413-ref11">11</xref>].</p><p>Due to diversified biological activity and less extensive research work, it is necessary to further study this plant to identify and depict bioactive principles. Our focus is to isolate and identify secondary metabolites from polar methanolic fraction of the leaves of Bridelia stipularis. In this study, we mention isolation of three flavonoids from the leaves of Bridelia stipularis along with its in vitro antioxidant and cytotoxicity activity. All of them are very first time reported for this plant.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Method</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Collection and Preparation</title><p>The leaves of Bridelia stipularis was collected in October 2018 from Narsingdi district. Later it was identified by an expert from Bangladesh National Herbarium (BNH). After cleaning and shade drying for two weeks, they were crushed into coarse powder using high capacity grinding machine.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Extraction</title><p>About 1500 gm of powdered plant material was taken in an amber-colored bottle and soaked with distilled methanol for 15 days with occasional shaking and stirring. The mixture was therefore filtered using a fresh cotton plug. The solvent of the mixture was evaporated using Buchii Rotavapour rotary evaporator at 40˚C temperature and low pressure and the extract was prepared.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Chromatographic Separation</title><p>Subsequently adding dichloromethane (DCM) to the extract, dichloromethane (DCM) soluble fraction was removed and the remaining portion was methanolic fraction of the extract. The methanolic fraction was subjected to column chromatography to separate their constituents based on adsorption using wet packing method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101413-ref12">12</xref>]. Later these column fractions were analyzed by thin layer chromatography [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101413-ref13">13</xref>] and compounds of interest were isolated using preparative layer chromatography (PLC) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101413-ref13">13</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Structure Elucidation</title><p>Finally their structures were elucidated using <sup>1</sup>H NMR spectroscopy (400 MHz, CD<sub>3</sub>OD).</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Determination of DPPH Scavenging Activity</title><p>The free radical scavenging activities of the plant extracts on 1,1-diphenyl- 2picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), a stable radical, were estimated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101413-ref14">14</xref>]. 2.0 mL of a methanol solution of the extract at different concentration from 400.0 to 1.5625 &#181;g/mL were mixed with 2.0 mL of a DPPH methanol solution (20 μg/mL). After 30 minutes reaction period at room temperature in dark place the absorbance was measured at 517 nm against methanol as blank by UV spectrophotometer. The antioxidant potential was assayed from the bleaching of purple colored methanol solution of DPPH radical by the plant extract as compared to that of tert-butyl-1-hydroxytoluene (BHT) by UV spectrophotometer.</p><p>Inhibition of free radical DPPH in percent (I %) was calculated as follows:</p><p>I % = ( 1 − A b s o r b a n c e   o f   s a m p l e A b s o r b a n c e   o f   b l a n k ) &#215; 1 0 0 %</p><p>Where, Absorbance of blank is the absorbance of control reaction (containing all reagents except the test material).</p><p>Extract concentration providing 50% inhibition (IC<sub>50</sub>) was calculated from the graph plotted inhibition percentage against extract concentration.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Brine Shrimp Lethality Bioassay</title><p>Brine shrimp eggs were hatched in simulated sea water to get nauplii. By the addition of calculated amount of dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO), desired concentration of the test samples were prepared. The nauplii were counted by visual inspection and were taken in vials containing 5 ml of simulated sea water. Then samples of different concentrations were added to the pre-marked vials through micropipette. The vials were then left for 24 hours. Survivors are counted after 24 hours [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101413-ref15">15</xref>]. The median lethal concentration (LC<sub>50</sub>) value was calculated from the graph plotted percentage mortality rate against extract concentration.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>Three known flavonoids have been isolated from the methanolic fraction of the leaves of Bridelia stipularis. They were identified as 7-O-methyl luteolin (1), apigenin (2) and 5, 7, 2’, 5’ tetrahydroxyflavone (3) by <sup>1</sup>H NMR spectroscopic studies and comparing with the published data (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>Ethyl acetate soluble fraction of Bridelia stipularis and apigenin isolated from the plant showed strong antioxidant activity having IC<sub>50</sub> value of 8.77, 8.005 &#181;g/mL respectively against BHT with IC<sub>50</sub> value 5.64 &#181;g/mL. Chloroform soluble fraction of Bridelia stipularis was found to be most toxic to brine shrimp and petroleum ether soluble fraction showed moderate toxicity having LC<sub>50</sub> value of 1.05, 1.71 &#181;g/mL respectively with compared to vincristine sulphate with LC<sub>50</sub> value 0.9258 &#181;g/mL.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Characterization of Compound 1</title><p>Compound 1 was obtained from the test tubes 80 - 83 of column chromatography by PLC as colorless liquid and molecular formula of 1 was determined as C<sub>16</sub>H<sub>13</sub>O<sub>7</sub>. <sup>1</sup>H NMR spectrum (400 MHz, CD<sub>3</sub>OD) of 1 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) showed a proton singlet at δ 6.60 proton was assigned to H-3. Three broad singlets at 6.18, δ 6.42 and δ 7.49 was comparable to that of three meta coupled aromatic doublets which were assigned to H-6, H-8 and H-2’. A proton signal at δ 6.93 (d, J = 8.4 Hz) proton was assigned to H-5’ and another proton signal at 7.51 (d, J = 8.4 Hz) was comparable to that of an ortho and meta coupled aromatic proton assigned to H-6’. Finally three protons singlet at δ 3.97 was characteristic for the methyl proton located at 7 position of the benzene ring. So 1 was identified as 7-O methyl luteolin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101413-ref16">16</xref>].</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> <sup>1</sup>H NMR (400 MHz, CD<sub>3</sub>OD) spectroscopic data of compound 1, 2 and 3</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Position</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >δ<sub>H</sub>, J in Hz</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >H-3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.60 (s)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.58 (s)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.53 (s)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >H-6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.18 (bs)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.18 (d, J = 2.0 Hz)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.20 (d, J = 2.0 Hz)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >H-8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.42 (bs)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.46 (d, J = 2.0 Hz)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.43 (d, J = 2.0 Hz)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >H-2’</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.49 (bs)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.85 (d, J = 8.8 Hz)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >H-3’</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.93 (d, J = 8.8 Hz)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.89 (d, J = 8.4 Hz)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >H-4’</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.38 (dd, J = 2.4 Hz,8.4 Hz)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >H-5’</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.93 (d, J = 8.4 Hz)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.93 (d, J = 8.8 Hz)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >H-6’</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.51 (d, J = 8.4 Hz)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.85 (d, J = 8.8 Hz)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.37 (d, J = 2.4 Hz)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OCH<sub>3</sub>-7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.97 (s)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Characterization of Compound 2</title><p>Test tubes 230 - 234 of column chromatography yielded compound 2 by PLC as colorless liquid and it’s molecular formula was found to be C<sub>15</sub>H<sub>10</sub>O<sub>5</sub>. In <sup>1</sup>H NMR spectrum (400 MHz, CD<sub>3</sub>OD) of 2 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>), a proton singlet at δ 6.58 proton was assigned to H-3. Two protons signals at δ 6.18 (d, J = 2.0 Hz) and δ 6.46 (d, J = 2.0 Hz) protons were assigned to H-6 and H-8 respectively. H-6 and H-8 showed meta coupling (J = 2.0 Hz) to each other. Two protons signals at δ 6.93 (d, J = 8.8 Hz) were assigned to aromatic protons H-3’, H-5’. Another two protons signals at δ 7.85 (d, J = 8.8 Hz) protons were assigned to H-2’, H-6’of B ring respectively. H-2’, H-6’ and H-3’, H-5’ showed ortho coupling (J = 8.8 Hz) to each other. These data were characteristic for a 5, 7, 4’ trisubstituted flavone. By analyzing the spectral data, compound 2 was identified as apigenin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101413-ref16">16</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Characterization of Compound 3</title><p>Compound 3 was obtained from the test tubes 240-246 of column chromatography as colorless liquid by PLC. Molecular formula of 3 was determined as C<sub>15</sub>H<sub>10</sub>O<sub>6</sub>. In <sup>1</sup>H NMR spectrum (400 MHz, CD<sub>3</sub>OD) of 3, (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) showed a proton singlet at δ 6.53 which was assigned to H-3. Two proton signals at δ 6.20 (d, J = 2.0 Hz) and 6.43 (d, J = 2.0 Hz) protons were assigned to H-6 and H-8 respectively. H-6 and H-8 showed meta coupling (J = 2.0 Hz) to each other. Three proton signals at δ 7.38 (dd, J = 8.4 Hz, 2.4 Hz) and 6.89 (d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.37 (d, J = 2.4 Hz) indicated the ABC type aromatic ring where they were assigned to H-4’, H-3’ and H-6’ of the B ring. Based on above features, compound 3 was confirmed as 5, 7, 2’, 5’ tetrahydroxyflavone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101413-ref17">17</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Free Radical Scavenging Activity</title><p>By measuring free radical scavenging activity, antioxidant activity of plant extracts can be measured. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> showed inhibition rates of different fractions of Bridelia stipularis. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> showed different degree of antioxidant activity exerted by different solvent fractions of the plant as well as apigenin. Here apigenin as well as ethyl acetate soluble fraction showed strong antioxidant activity. Antioxidant activity of Bridelia stipularis has also been reported previously [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101413-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101413-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101413-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101413-ref18">18</xref>] which can be explained from the presence of flavone derivatives. The chemical structure of flavone derivatives has impact on free radical scavenging activity. Their antioxidant activity is directly proportional to the number of hydroxyl moieties present in their structure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101413-ref19">19</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Brine Shrimp Lethality Bioassay</title><p>Brine shrimp lethality bioassay has been utilized as a primary screening method of lethality of different plant extracts. It is a simple, rapid, inexpensive, in house screening method. All the samples having LC<sub>50</sub> value &lt; 1000 &#181;g/mL are considered for further pharmacological analysis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101413-ref15">15</xref>]. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> demonstrated mortality rate of different fractions of Bridelia stipularis while <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> showed different degree of lethality of plant extracts of Bridelia stipularis to Brine shrimp. Among the fractions, chloroform soluble fraction was found to be</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> % Inhibition value of different fractions of Bridelia stipularis</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Conc. (&#181;g/mL)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >BHT</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >BSA</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >BSE</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >BSC</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >BSP</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Apigenin</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.36%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.46%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.36%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.45%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.51%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.04%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.03%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.16%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.03%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.81%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.19%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.73%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.39%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68. 2%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.37%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.86%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.90%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.45%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.08%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.21%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.71%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.30%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.26%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.53%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.47%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.24%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.47%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.73%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.97%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.21%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.21%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.64%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.94%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.43%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.35%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.91%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.95%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.02%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.02%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.46%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.37%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.32%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.125</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.71%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.06%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.42%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.83%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.71%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.02%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5625</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.77%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.77%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.83%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.53%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.42%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.77%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>BHT = Tert-butyl-1-hydroxytoluene, BSA = Aqueous soluble fraction, BSE = Ethyl acetate soluble fraction, BSC = Chloroform soluble fraction, BSP = Petroleum ether soluble fraction, BS = Bridelia stipularis; Absorbance of blank = 0.3018.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Antioxidant activity of different fractions of Bridelia stipularis</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Different fractions</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >IC<sub>50</sub> value</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Regression Equation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2</sup></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BHT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >y = 0.1327 ln(x) + 0.2705</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9412</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BSA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >y = 0.0622 ln(x) + 0.276</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2227</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BSE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >y = 0.1571 ln(x) + 0.1589</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9186</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BSC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >y = 0.1374 ln(x) + 0.0043</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.953</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BSP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >y = 0.0777 ln(x) + 0.2513</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9861</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Apigenin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >y = 0.1162 ln(x) + 0.2583</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9842</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> % Mortality rate of different fractions of Bridelia stipularis</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Conc. (&#181;g/mL)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >VS</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >BSA</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >BSE</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >BSC</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >BSP</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.125</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5625</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>VS = Vincristine sulphate.</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Cytotoxicity of different fractions of Bridelia stipularis</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Different fractions</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >LC<sub>50</sub> value</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Regression equation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2</sup></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >VS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9258</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >y = 27.985x + 24.091</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9614</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BSA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >y = 12.885x − 4.0732</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9127</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BSE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >y = 20.485x − 4.1928</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.942</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BSC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >y = 28.79x + 19.753</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9797</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BSP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >y = 28.79x + 0.8645</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9611</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>most toxic to brine shrimp and petroleum ether soluble fraction showed moderate toxicity compared to anticancer drug vincristine sulphate. Cytotoxic activity of this plant extracts has also been previously reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.101413-ref7">7</xref>]. As there was no available data on Acute Oral Toxicity Assay using this plant extract, further in vivo study is required to ensure its activity without toxicity in susceptible biological systems.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>Three flavonoids, named as 7-O-methyl luteolin, apigenin and 5, 7, 2’, 5’ tetrahydroxyflavone have been isolated from the methanolic extracts of leaves of Bridelia stipularis. Isolation of these compounds from this plant is documented for the first time. Some of the fractions showed antioxidant activity as well as lethality. So the investigation revealed the phytochemical importance of this plant.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This investigation was funded by National Science and Technology Fellowship, Ministry of Science and Technology, People’s Republic of Bangladesh.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors have no conflict of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Puja, S.D., Shahriar, K.R., Hasan, C.M. and Ahsan, M. (2020) Flavonoids from the Leaves of Bridelia stipularis with in Vitro Antioxidant and Cytotoxicity Activity. Pharmacology &amp; Pharmacy, 11, 137-146. https://doi.org/10.4236/pp.2020.117013</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.101413-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khan, I., Jan, S.A., Shinwari, Z.K., Ali, M., Khan, Y. and Kumar, T. (2017) Ethnobotany and Medicinal Uses of Folklore Medicinal Plants Belonging to Family Acathaceae: An Updated Review. Medcrave Online Journal of Biology and Medicine, 1, 9-12. https://doi.org/10.15406/mojbm.2017.01.00009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101413-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dias, D.A., Urban, S. and Roessner, U. (2012) A Historical Overview of Natural Products in Drug Discovery. Metabolites, 2, 303-306. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo2020303</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101413-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dressler, S. (1996) Proposal to Conserve the Name Bridelia (Euphorbiaceae) with a Conserved Spelling. Taxon, 45, 337-338. https://doi.org/10.2307/1224687</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101413-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ngueyem, T.A., Brusotti, G., Caccialanza, G. and Finzi, P.V. (2009) The Genus Bridelia: A Phytochemical and Ethnobotanical Review. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 124, 339-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2009.05.019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101413-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anjum, A., Sultan, M.Z., Sikder, M.A.A., Hasan, C.M., Al-Mansoor, M.A. and Rashid, M.A. (2016) Bioactive Steroid and Triterpenoids from Bridelia stipularis (L) Blume. Dhaka University Journal of Pharmaceutical Science, 15, 221-225. https://doi.org/10.3329/dujps.v15i2.30941</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101413-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khisha, T., Karim, R., Chowdhury, S.R. and Banoo, R. (2012) Ethnomedical Studies of Chakma Communities of Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh. Bangladesh Pharmaceutical Journal, 15, 59-67.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101413-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anjum, A., Haque, M.R., Rahman, M.S., Hasan, C.M., Haque, M.E. and Rashid, M.A. (2011) In Vitro Antibacterial, Antifungal and Cytotoxic Activity of Three Bangladeshi Bridelia Species. International Research of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 1, 149-154. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273439024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101413-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mallya, P.S., Prabhu, S., Jose, M. and Mallya, P.S. (2015) Anticandidal Effect of Extract of Bridelia stipularis. Journal of International Medicine and Dentistry, 2, 104-110. https://imsear.searo.who.int/handle/123456789/163460 https://doi.org/10.18320/JIMD/201502.02104</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101413-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sreenivas, V.K., Jisha, V.N., Martin, K.P. and Madhusoodanan, P.V. (2011) Bridelia stipularis: A New Source for Anthocyanin Production in Vitro. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 33, 2051-2058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-011-0735-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101413-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khan, S., Islam, R., Alam, M.J. and Rahman, M.M. (2018) Investigation of Anti-Diabetic Properties of Ethanol Leaf Extract of Bridelia stipularis L. on Alloxan Type-2 Diabetic Rats. Journal of Advances on Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 18, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.9734/JAMPS/2018/45396</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101413-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anjum, A., Sikder, M.A., Haque, M.R., Hasan, C.M. and Rashid, M.A. (2013) In Vitro Antioxidant and Thrombolytic Activity of Bridelia Species Growing in Bangladesh. Journal of Scientific Research, 5, 343-351. https://doi.org/10.3329/jsr.v5i2.13568</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101413-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ebere, E.C., Obinna, I.B. and Wirnkor, V.A. (2019) Applications of Column, Paper, Thin Layer and Ion Exchange Chromatography in Purifying Samples: Mini Review. SF Journal of Pharmaceutical and Analytical Chemistry, 2019, Article ID: 1018. https://scienceforecastoa.com</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101413-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sherma, J. and Fried, B. (2003) Handbook of Thin-Layer Chromatography. CRC Press, Boca Raton. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203912430</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101413-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brand-Williams, W., Cuvelier, M.E. and Berset, C. (1995) Use of a Free Radical Method to Evaluate Antioxidant Activity. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 28, 25-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101413-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Meyer, B.N., Ferrigni, N.R., Putnam, J.E., Jacobsen, L.B., Nichols, D.E. and McLaughlin, J.L. (1982) Brine Shrimp: A Convenient General Bioassay for Active Plant Constituents. Planta Medica, 45, 31-34. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-971236</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101413-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chaturvedula, V.S.P. and Prakash, I. (2013) Flavonoids from Astragalus Propinquus. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 5, 261-265. http://www.jocpr.com</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101413-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Miyaichi, Y., Hanamitsu, E., Kizu, H. and Tomimori, T. (2006) Studies on the Constituents of Scutellaria Species (XXII). Constituents of the Roots of Scutellaria amabilis HARA. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 54, 435-441. https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.54.435</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101413-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yusufzai, S.K., Khan, M.S., Hanry, E.L., Rafatullah, M. and Elison, B.B. (2019) GC-MS Analysis of Chemical Constituents and in Vitro Antioxidant Activity of the Organic Extracts from the Stem of Bridelia stipularis. Journal of Sains Malaysiana, 48, 999-1009. https://doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2019-4805-08</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.101413-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Majewska, M., Skrzycki, M., Podsaid, M. and Czeczot, H. (2011) Evaluation of Antioxidant Potential of Flavonoids: An in Vitro Study. Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica, 68, 611-615. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51528412_Evaluation_of_antioxidant_potential_of_flavonoids_An_in_vitro_study</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>