<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMMCE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4077</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmmce.2020.84011</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMMCE-100652</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Engineering</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Physical-Chemical and Mechanical Characterization of the Bast Fibers of &lt;i&gt;Triumfetta cordifolia&lt;/i&gt; A.Rich. from the Equatorial Region of Cameroon
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Armel</surname><given-names>Edwige Mewoli</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>César</surname><given-names>Segovia</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fabien</surname><given-names>Betene Ebanda</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Atangana</surname><given-names>Ateba</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pierre</surname><given-names>Marcel Anicet Noah</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Benoit</surname><given-names>Ndiwe</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abel</surname><given-names>Emmanuel Njom</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Laboratory of Mechanics, University of Douala, Cameroon, Douala, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>CETELOR, University of Lorraine, CETELOR/27 rue Philippe SEGUIN, Epinal, France</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Laboratory of Mechanics, Materials, Structures and Integrated Manufacturing, National Advanced School of Engineering, 
University of Yaounde 1, Yaounde, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Mechanical Engineering, ENSET, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Laboratory of Mechanics, Materials, and Modelization, National School of AGRO-Industrial Sciences (ENSAI) Physics 
Application and Engineering, Ngaoundere University, Ngaoundere, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>02</day><month>06</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>163</fpage><lpage>176</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>30,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2020</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>31,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2020</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>3,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The project consists in the implementation of a biocomposite based on tannin resin and natural rubber matrices with the bast fibres of 
  Triumfetta cordifolia A.Rich.“
  Okong” from the equatorial region of Cameroon as reinforcement. A study of this still little known fibre is necessary. This paper evaluates the physico-chemical and mechanical characteristics of the fibers. The fibers are extracted by us. A series of experiments is conducted for this purpose: morphological observation with a scanning electron microscope (SEM); density evaluation with a helium pycnometer; absorption rate evaluation according to the protocol available in the literature, Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometry (FT-IR), chemical composition evaluation according to ASTM 1972 and ASTM 1977 standards, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and tensile tests on fiber bundles according to NF T25-501-3. The results show that the fiber is made up of several elementary fibers with oval cross-sections. A density of 1.477g/cm
  <sup>3</sup> close to that of hemp. These fibers have a water absorption rate of 342.5%, which correlates with the presence of free hydroxyl functional groups obtained from the spectrometry study (FT-IR). Chemical analysis reveals that the fiber is made up of celluloses (44.4%), hemicelluloses (30.8%), lignins (18.9%), pectins (3.3%), waxes (0.5%) and minerals (2.1%). In addition, we learn that the fibers studied dehydrate at 11.49%, showinga notable thermal stability around 235&#176;C with a peak thermal decomposition of cellulose located at 420&#176;C. In terms of mechanical behaviour, the results reveal that the fibers offer a Young’s modulus in traction of 12.4 &#177; 6.9 GPa, a tensile strength of 526 &#177; 128 MPa and an elongation at break of 2.25%. The information thus obtained makes it possible to place these fibers in the same fiber group as flax and jute. They could therefore be used for the same types of applications. They also inform us that these fibers can withstand the temperatures of composite shaping by thermocompression.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Triumfetta cordifolia&lt;/i&gt; Fibers</kwd><kwd> Morphology</kwd><kwd> Chemical Analysis</kwd><kwd> Thermal  Degradation</kwd><kwd> Mechanical Behavior</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The selective choice of a reinforcing fiber is of the utmost importance and requires knowledge of all the physico-chemical, mechanical and thermal properties in order to produce good quality composite materials. To this end, natural fibers are governed by a set of parameters, including: chemical composition, crystallinity index (CrI) of the cellulose, microfibrillar angle (MFA), good length/diameter (L/D) ratio of the fiber, good tensile strength, good elongation capacity and low sensitivity to temperature and humidity variations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref1">1</xref>].</p><p>In order to develop natural composites based on plant resins, reinforced with bast fibers of Triumfetta cordifolia A.Rich. (TC) harvested in Cameroon, knowledge of these parameters is essential for the overall performance of the composite.</p><p>To date, Senwitz et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref2">2</xref>], have carried out a characterisation study of TC fibers and the results reveal that the property values obtained from TC fibers harvested in the northern zone of Angola are comparable to those of commercial jute, flax, hemp and kenaf fibers. They also reveal the potential required as a reinforcement for composites. Indeed, these results show an average Young’s modulus of (12.5 - 53.4 GPa), tensile strength of TC fibers (209.1 - 916.3 MPa) and (1.56% - 1.56%) deformation at break. They also have a density of (1.16 - 1.41 g/cm<sup>3</sup>), a microfibril angle of (7˚ &#177; 5˚), and finally a chemical composition consisting of Holocellulose (72.26% - 87.90%), lignin (9.90% - 13.67%), and extract content (0.70% - 3.10%).</p><p>In view of these encouraging properties, develop biocomposites based on plant resins with TC bast fiber reinforcements. In the hypothesis of the use of this fiber, in the reinforcement of plant matrices such as tannin extracted from Aningr&#233; or Abam (Aningeria superba) and natural rubber latex (NR) derived from Brazilian rubber grown in Cameroon, shaping requires knowledge of the degradation temperatures of the fibers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref4">4</xref>]. It is therefore imperative that the degradation profile and in particular the thermal stability of the fibers be known before their use in composite applications [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref5">5</xref>]. For the moment, this information is available for our fiber. It is known that, the composites with vegetable fiber reinforcements are shaped in the temperature range between 200˚C and 250˚C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref8">8</xref>]. Also, most of the specimens with vegetable fiber reinforced vulcanized natural rubber and tannin matrices are usually processed by thermocompression [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref9">9</xref>]. It is therefore imperative to complete the knowledge of the fiber.</p><p>After all, the characteristics of plant fibers vary from one geographical area to another, so it is advisable to repeat the determination of the characteristics of the fiber already available in the literature.</p><p>In this article, we present the fiber extraction procedure. Microscopic examination was performed using a Hitachi 3000 scanning electron microscope (SEM). The pycnometer was used to evaluate the density of the fibers. Chemical analysis was performed to determine the content of cellulose, hemicellulose in lignin, pectins in waxes and minerals. Moisture content was calculated. By means of infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) the structural functional groups were identified. The thermal behaviour of the fiber was evaluated by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Finally, the tensile properties of fiber bundles were measured using a FAVIMAT+ machine.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Extraction of Triumfetta cordifolia Fibers</title><p>The raw material <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(b) is collected in Yaound&#233; in the central region of Cameroon, in mid-December, when the ambient temperature is around 30˚C. The raw material is collected in the center of the country. For extraction of TC bark (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(c) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(d), the fiber is soaked in stagnant water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref10">10</xref>] for six (06) weeks (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(e)). They are then hand washed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(f) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(g)) to remove mucilage, rinsed with water and dried in the shade. These operations are carried out at a temperature between 27˚C and 30˚C. After this extraction process, the extracted fibers are shown in the figure (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(h)).</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis</title><p>The microscopic examination and the calculation of the effective cross-section are performed using Hitachi 3000 Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). In agreement A batch of staple fibers was mechanically opened on the Laroche opener at 1200 rpm. A type of process used in pre-treatment for composite/non-woven reinforcement type applications. The fibers are separated manually, aligned to have a homogeneous parallelization of the fibers and then introduced into the sample holder of the scanning electron microscope after metallization. All images were taken at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV. Image Pro Premier<sup>&#210;</sup> software is then used to determine the fiber dimensions.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Density Measurements</title><p>The fibers were previously dried in the oven at 60˚C for 24 hours and cooled in a desiccator at room temperature. The density of each sample is determined by measuring the dry fiber weight determined with a 0.0001 g precision balance and then introduced into the container of the Quantchrome Helium Pycnometer MVP-6DC Pycnometer Instruments. The operating principle of the helium pycnometer is based on the gas law [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref11">11</xref>], defined by Equation (1). The volume of the fiber is determined by measuring the pressure variation experienced by the fluid due to the displacement of the fluid in constant volume by the test sample. This method is in accordance with [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref12">12</xref>].</p><p>ρ = W f V p where V p = V c − ( V r ( P 1 P 2 ) − 1 ) (1)</p><p>where ρ is the density (g/cm<sup>3</sup>), V<sub>f</sub> is the fiber weight (g), V<sub>p</sub> is the sample volume (cm<sup>3</sup>), V<sub>c</sub> is the sample orifice volume (cm<sup>3</sup>), V<sub>r</sub> is the reference volume (cm<sup>3</sup>), P<sub>1</sub> is the pressure measured after pressurizing the reference volume (V<sub>r</sub>) (PSI), P<sub>2</sub> is the pressure measured after including the cell volume (V<sub>c</sub>) (PSI).</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Water Absorption</title><p>The TC fiber water absorption test was performed according to the method of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref13">13</xref>]. Seven samples were prepared and the mean percent water absorption was calculated using Equation (2). The samples were first weighed as M<sub>0</sub> and then immersed in fresh water for 24 hours at room temperature. After 24 hours of immersion, the samples were reweighed as M<sub>1</sub>.</p><p>Abs = M 1 − M 0 M 0 &#215; 100 % (2)</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. FTIR-ATR Spectrometry</title><p>A Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) analysis is performed using a Shimadzu IRAffinity-1 CE Shimadzu instrument equipped with a diamond crystal operating in ATR mode. The infrared spectrum is recorded from 500 to 4000 cm<sup>−1</sup> by accumulation of 32 scans with a resolution of 4 cm<sup>−1</sup>.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Chemical Characterization</title><p>The determination of the content of cellulose, hemicelluloses, lignin, pectin and waxes is carried out in accordance with ASTM 1972 and ASTM 1977. The method used is a method by successive extraction of the components of the fibrous material by solvents from a mass of approximately 2 g of ground and dried fiber. The first extraction the alcohol-toluene mixture which will dissolve the waxes and fats and then a second extraction is carried out with hot water at 90˚C which will allow the determination of the quantity of mineral salts as well as the low percentages of tannins, starch and polysaccharides. Then a third extraction to separate the pectins is carried out with an aqueous solution of ammonium oxalate extraction. Then the lignins are dissolved by a solution of sodium chlorite and glacial acetic acid. Finally, the hemicelluloses are solubilized by a solution of potassium hydroxide and then by a solution of soda which, by elimination, will make it possible to determine the percentage of cellulose and hemicellulose. The values obtained are the average of three repetitions of the rate of the constituents of the fibers.</p></sec><sec id="s2_7"><title>2.7. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)</title><p>The thermogravimetric analysis is performed on an analyzer (TGA) using the NETZSCH STA 449F3 Jupiter (Germany) under constant air from 25˚C to 700˚C at a heating rate of 10˚C/min. About 10 mg of the sample was used.</p></sec><sec id="s2_8"><title>2.8. Tensile Strength</title><p>The test specimens were first separated manually and stored in a conditioning chamber at a controlled temperature of 20˚C &#177; 1.5˚C and a relative humidity of 60% &#177; 1% for 24 hours. Tensile tests on fiber bundles were carried out on a FAVIMAT+ machine. For this purpose, 44 fibers were tested at a speed of 5mn/min in accordance with the NF T25-501-3 standard. The tests were carried out using a 3200 cN force sensor, the holding length was 10 mm. The effective cross-section was calculated from a scanning electron microscopy (SEM), using a Hitachi 3000 instrument, in accordance with [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref14">14</xref>].</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussions</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis</title><p>Like flax and hemp, TC fibers are located at the periphery of the stem. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(b) show the morphology of the TC fiber. It was possible to separate the fibers from each other and thus obtain the unitary fiber (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a)) by treatment one by one with a Laroche opener.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a) shows the cross-section of the TC fiber. This view shows that the structure of a TC fiber is made up of several elementary fibers (also called unit fibers) superimposed not only on the cross-section but also on the length of the fibers. They are firmly bonded together by pectin and other non-cellulosic compounds that give strength to the entire bundle [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref15">15</xref>]. In addition, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a)</p><p>shows the cross-section of the lumen structure. This lumen is oval in shape, this shape and large aperture could be due to the efforts applied during the preparation of the fibers. Indeed, the fibers were separated (opened) with the Laroche opener. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(b) is a longitudinal view of the TC fiber. It shows that there are impurities on the surface, and this structure has many burrs, which is due to the absence of surface treatments. However, the strength of the bundle structure is much lower than that of the elementary cell (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Density</title><p>The density of TC fiber is low at 1.477 &#177; 0.016 g/cm<sup>3</sup>, but close to (1.41 g/cm<sup>3</sup>) compared to the same species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref2">2</xref>]. Moreover, it should be noted that it is similar to that of flax fibers and (1.50 g/cm<sup>3</sup>) of hemp fibers (1.47 g/cm<sup>3</sup>) respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref17">17</xref>] and therefore TC fiber can be used in the same applications as the latter.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Water Absorption</title><p>Water absorption by TC fibers is high at 342.3%. This highly hydrophilic character is also attributed to the presence of hemicelluloses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref18">18</xref>], but also to the high group content of free hydroxyl groups [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref13">13</xref>], responsible for moisture sorption (see IR-spectrum in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>) and affects the physical and mechanical properties of our fibers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref18">18</xref>]. Also the high porosity observed on the microstructure (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref19">19</xref>], this character leads to drops in stiffness and the appearance of cracks within the composite. Nevertheless, it should be noted that this disadvantage could still be improved by a surface treatment.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. FTIR-ATR Spectrometry</title><p>The spectral analysis of the TC fibers obtained gives us the FTIR-ATR spectrum (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p><p>The infrared spectrum obtained above shows the positions of the well-defined remarkable peaks: 3333, 2917, 1728, 1605, 1506, 1425, 1315, 1031 and 662 cm<sup>−1</sup> identified in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. The first peak at 3330 cm<sup>−1</sup> represents the hydrogen (O-H) bonds of the inter and intramolecular network of cellulose, as well as the free hydroxyl groups of hemicellulose [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref20">20</xref>]. Moreover, C&#233;lino et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref16">16</xref>] have observed</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Characteristic positions of the FTIR bands of TC fiber and their assignments</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Wavenumber (cm<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Assignments</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >References</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3333</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >OH stretching (cellulose)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref20">20</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2917</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C-H stretching (cellulose-hemicellulose)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref22">22</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1728</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C=O stretching vibration (pectins, waxes et hemicellulose)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref23">23</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1605</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aromatic ring (lignin)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref22">22</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1506</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C=C aromatic symmetrical stretching (lignin)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref22">22</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1425</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vibration of the carboxyl bond characteristic of pectins</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref16">16</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1315</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CH wagging (cellulose and hemicellulose) C-O stretching vibration in ester</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref25">25</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1234</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acetyl groups (hemicellulose)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref16">16</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1031</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C-O stretching ring (cellulose and hemicellulose)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref16">16</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >662</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C-OH out of plane bending (cellulose)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref25">25</xref>]</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>that this absorption band is characteristic of the presence of liquid water more or less bound to the polymeric network that constitutes the natural fibers. The second peak located at 2917 cm<sup>−1</sup> represents the (-CH) group present in hemicellulose and cellulose [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref23">23</xref>]. However, we observe an evidence by the decrease of the signal of the characteristic peak at 1728 cm<sup>−1</sup> which corresponds to symmetrical elongation of ester group (C=O of carboxylic acids) present in pectins, waxes and acetyl groups present in hemicelluloses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref23">23</xref>]. Also the absorption of this peak confirms the hydrophilic nature of the natural fiber [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref21">21</xref>]. The region of the spectrum in the band between 1506 cm<sup>−1</sup> and 1605 cm<sup>−1</sup> is characteristic of the symmetrical aromatic (C=C) elongation present in lignin. The observable peak around 1315 cm<sup>−1</sup> is characteristic of the vibration of the -CH bond and the aromatic -CO group present in polysaccharides. From there, at 1031 cm<sup>−1</sup>, peaks corresponding to stretching bonds of the C-O ring are found. These bonds are characteristic of cellulose and hemicellulose [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref16">16</xref>]. Finally, the characteristic peak at 662 cm<sup>−1</sup> is attributed to cellulose [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref25">25</xref>]. These results show that TC fiber is composed of cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, pectins, waxes and polysaccharides. It is therefore similar to known plant fibers such as jute, sisal, flax and hemp [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref26">26</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Chemical Composition</title><p>The chemical composition of the TC fiber and the values of other vegetable fibers are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. In contrast to the work of Senwitz et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref2">2</xref>], which gives the holocellulose (72.26% - 87.90%) and extract content (0.70% - 3.10%) contents, this chemical analysis goes as far as to dissociate the cellulose, hemicellulose, pectins, waxes and minerals in terms of content. It appears that TC fiber contains 44.4% cellulose, thus less than hemp or flax but close to kenaf, jute and coconut fiber in the literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref29">29</xref>]. This content also indicates that its fibers could find very good applications in composites and textiles. On the other hand, the 30.8% hemicellulose content is higher compared to conventional fibers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref30">30</xref>]. This is due to its highly hydrophilic nature, which is responsible for the absorption of water due to the presence of free hydroxyl groups in its structure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref20">20</xref>]. The percentage of lignin (18.9%) is similar to that of flax and kenaf [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref27">27</xref>] but it is high compared to the work of Senwitz et al., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref2">2</xref>]. These studies also note that the high lignin and hemicellulose content increases with retting time. Consequently, the considerable amount of pectins (3.3%) and hemicellulose that is not removed during retting results in a significant reduction in the stiffness and strength of TC fibers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref2">2</xref>]. Finally, TC fibers have (2.1%) minerals and also a very low wax content (0.5%).</p></sec><sec id="s3_6"><title>3.6. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)</title><p>The results of the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of the fiber under study give us the TG-DTG curves in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Chemical composition of lignocellulosic fibers</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fibers</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cellulose (wt%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Hemicellulose (wt%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Lignin (wt%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pectins (wt%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Wax (Grease and oil) (wt%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Minerals (Tannin and starch) (wt%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >References</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Flax</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60 - 81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.6 - 20.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 - 19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref31">31</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hemp</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70 - 74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.9 - 22.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.7 - 5.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref31">31</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jute</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45 - 84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 - 21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 - 26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref31">31</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K&#233;naf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 - 63.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.6 - 21.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 - 19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref31">31</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coconut</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36 - 43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15 - 14.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41 - 45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 - 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref31">31</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >*TC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >*Current study</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Holocellulose (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Extract content (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref2">2</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TC (UT)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >72.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TC (3W)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >82.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TC (6W)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >87.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*TC (*)Current study; UT, untreated; 3W, fibers retted for three weeks; 6W, fibers retted for six weeks.</p><p>These curves are similar to those obtained for linen, jute, banana and hemp [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref33">33</xref>]. They show three main regions of mass loss: An initial mass loss, observed in the temperature range 75˚C - 144˚C, of about 11.49%, which is mainly attributed to fiber dehydration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref17">17</xref>]. This mass loss stabilizes at 235˚C and is the locus of thermal stability of the fiber [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref33">33</xref>]. A further loss of mass will occur above 235˚C (46.02%), due to the decomposition of the less thermally stable elements such as non-structural hemicelluloses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref34">34</xref>], fats and waxes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref35">35</xref>]. The inflection point observed at about 336˚C, (loss of mass of about 43%), would correspond to the destruction of part of the constituents (cellulose in particular and the oxidative degradation of carbonized residues) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref33">33</xref>].</p><p>The DTG curve of the TC fiber shows a peak at 420˚C (mass loss of 72%) which is due to the thermal decomposition of the cellulose [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref33">33</xref>]. According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref22">22</xref>], lignin is more heat resistant and decomposes last. This decomposition is observed in the 420˚C - 482˚C region. Above 482˚C, mass loss becomes very slow and a stable residue is formed. A residue of 12.69% of the TC fiber remains after heating to 700˚C. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> compares the degradation characteristics of the fiber under study with those of other known plant fibers.</p><p>It can be observed that TC has an important residue compared to other vegetable fibers except banana fibers, which would confirm a better temperature resistance.</p></sec><sec id="s3_7"><title>3.7. Tensile Strength of TC fiber</title><p>The tensile tests reported in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(a) show that the TC fiber is a fiber with low elasticity and its mode of rupture qualifies it as brittle.</p><p>Figures 5(b)-(d) and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> through the associated values show that these fibers have low mechanical properties compared to those of the same plant from the work of Senwitz et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref2">2</xref>] except for elongation they are the most extensible.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Thermal behaviour of vegetals fibers. *(700˚C)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Fibers</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Temperature degradation (˚C)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Degradation (%) of Cellulose</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Residue % at 800˚C</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >References</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Initial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Final</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >235</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >420</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.69*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Current study</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sisal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >220</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >415</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref33">33</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kenaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >233.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >442.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref36">36</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jute</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >229.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >442.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref36">36</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Roselle</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >220</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref13">13</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Banana</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >263</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >374</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref37">37</xref>]</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Mechanical properties Triumfetta cordifolia compared to other plant fibers</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fibers</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ρ (g/cm<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Area (&#181;m<sup>2</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >σ (Mpa)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >E (Gpa)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ε (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >References</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cotton</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300 - 600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.50 - 12.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref31">31</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Flax</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >345 - 1035</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7 - 3.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref31">31</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jute</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >187 - 773</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 - 26.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5 - 3.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref31">31</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.947</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150 - 1738</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3 - 17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.9 - 53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref38">38</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.043</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0102</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref39">39</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TC (UT)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >209.1 &#177; 64.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.5 &#177; 3.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.55 &#177; 0.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref2">2</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TC (3W)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >916.3 &#177; 370.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.4 &#177; 10.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.75 &#177; 0.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref2">2</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TC (6W)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >890.6 &#177; 293.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.8 &#177; 9.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.56 &#177; 0.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref2">2</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >*TC<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.477</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4437</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >526 &#177; 128</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.4 &#177; 6.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(*)Current study</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The tensile strength of TC fibers (526 MPa) has similar values to cotton (300 - 600 MPa) or flax (345 - 1035 MPa) or jute (187 - 773 MPa), while their elongations (2.25%) are similar to those of jute or sisal in the literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref31">31</xref>], but also to that of untreated TC (2.55%) from the work of Senwitz et al., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref2">2</xref>]. The Young’s modulus of the fiber samples from TC (12.4 GPa) is rather low compared to that of TC (53.4 - 59.8 GPa) routed between three and six weeks respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref2">2</xref>]. Similar values show a stiffness comparable to that of cotton (5.50 - 12.6 GPa) or jute (10 - 26.5 GPa) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref31">31</xref>], (6.3 - 26 GPa) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref22">22</xref>] and RC (2.3 - 17 GPa) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref38">38</xref>]. All these mechanical properties (σ, E, ε) of TC fibers are still superior to those of NA fiber [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref39">39</xref>]. These fiber tensile results also support the 44.4% cellulose content obtained in the chemical composition. Also, many factors such as extraction methods, fiber morphology, climate, age (or maturity stage), different geographical area could influence these mechanical properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref31">31</xref>].</p><p>In the end, TC fibers are flexible compared to hemp and flax fibers as these have a low Young’s modulus. The softer a fiber is, the lower its Young’s modulus and therefore it finds applications in composites and textiles [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.100652-ref1">1</xref>].</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>The bast fibers of Triumfetta cordifolia A.Rich., extracted by retting, have been characterized. The results reveal that the fiber consists of several elementary fibers with oval cross-sections. They have a density of 1.477 g/cm<sup>3</sup>. Although the water absorption of these fibers is quite high, it can be improved by surface treatment of the fiber. The fiber consists of cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, pectins and minerals. Its 44.4% cellulose content in particular gives it tensile properties similar to those of jute, flax and kenaf. This makes them suitable for the same applications. Moreover, in terms of mechanical properties, TC fiber has a relatively low tensile stress and high elongation at break compared to the same species in the literature. This difference could be justified by the different geographical location of fiber harvesting. This study also shows that the fiber can withstand the processing temperatures of the proposed composites without degradation. It is therefore suitable for the implementation of composites by thermocompression. This work has therefore confirmed that TC fibers are suitable for the reinforcement of composite materials. In perspective, this work will be complemented by surface treatments of TC fibers and then biocomposites will be manufactured with matrices of tannin resins and natural rubber latex reinforced with treated and untreated TC fibers.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>Our thanks go to Jean-Bosco Saha Tchinda and Herman Assonfack Lekane of the Laboratory of Macromolecular Applied Chemistry Unit, Faculty of Sciences of the University of Yaound&#233; 1, for their availability and practical advice. The same goes for Stanislas Tido Tiwa of the African University of Science and Technology, Abuja-Nigeria for his great availability and numerous services.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Mewoli, A.E., Segovia, C., Betene Ebanda, F., Ateba, A., Noah, P.M.A., Ndiwe, B. and Njom, A.E. (2020) Physical-Chemical and Mechanical Characterization of the Bast Fibers of Triumfetta cordifolia A.Rich. from the Equatorial Region of Cameroon. Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, 8, 163-176. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmmce.2020.84011</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.100652-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sauvageon, T. (2017) Caractérisation et valorisation de fibres de chanvre issues de sols et de matériels délaissés: cas du traitement par explosion à la vapeur (Doctoral dissertation).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Senwitz, C., Kempe, A., Neinhuis, C., Mandombe, J.L., Branquima, M.F. and Lautenschl&amp;#228;ger, T. (2016) Almost Forgotten Resources—Biomechanical Properties of Traditionally Used Bast Fibers from Northern Angola. BioResources, 11, 7595-7607. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.11.3.7595-7607</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Poletto, M., Zattera, A.J., Forte, M.M.C. and Santana, R.M.C. (2012) Thermal Decomposition of Wood: Influence of Wood Components and Cellulose Crystallite Size. Bioresource Technology, 109, 148-153.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.122</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tserki, V., Matzinos, P., Kokkou, S. and Panayiotou, C. (2005) Novel Biodegradable Composites Based on Treated Lignocellulosic Waste Flour as Filler. Part I. Surface Chemical Modification and Characterization of Waste Flour. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 36, 965-974.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.11.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Poletto, M., Zattera, A.J. and Santana, R.M.C. (2012) Thermal Decomposition of Wood: Kinetics and Degradation Mechanisms. Bioresource Technology, 126, 7-12.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.133</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dumont, P., Orgéas, L., Martoia, F., Budtova, T. and Vincent, M. (2017) Mise en oeuvre des composites à fibres lignocellulosiques.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ouajai, S. and Shanks, R.A. (2005) Composition, Structure and Thermal Degradation of Hemp Cellulose after Chemical Treatments. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 89, 327-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.01.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bourmaud, A. and Balay, C. (2010) Effects of Thermo Mechanical Processing on the Mechanical Properties of Biocomposites Flax Fibers Evaluated by Nanoindentation. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 95, 1488-1494.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.06.022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alix, S. (2014) Développement de matériaux composites fiberux hautes performances à matrice bio-sourcée. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Lorraine, Lorraine.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brink, M. and Achigan-Dako, E.G. (2012) Plantes à fibers (Vol. 16) PROTA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lowell, S., et al. (2004) Characterization of Porous Solids and Powders: Surface Area, Pore Size and Density. Springer, Berlin, 327-330.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2303-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sreedhara, S.S. and Tata, N.R. (2013) A Novel Method for Measurement of Porosity in Nanofiber Mat Using Pycnometer in Filtration. Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics, 8, 155892501300800408. https://doi.org/10.1177/155892501300800408</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nadlene, R., Sapuan, S.M., Jawaid, M., Ishak, M.R. and Yusriah, L. (2015) Material Characterization of Roselle Fiber (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) as Potential Reinforcement Material for Polymer Composites. Fibers &amp; Textiles in Eastern Europe, 6, 23-30. https://doi.org/10.5604/12303666.1167413</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tahri, I., Ziegler-Devin, I., Ruelle, J., Segovia, C. and Brosse, N. (2016) Extraction and Characterization of Fibers from Palm Tree. BioResources, 11, 7016-7025.  
https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.11.3.7016-7025</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">De Rosa, I.M., Kenny, J.M., Puglia, D., Santulli, C. and Sarasini, F. (2010) Morphological, Thermal and Mechanical Characterization of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) Fibers as Potential Reinforcement in Polymer Composites. Composites Science and Technology, 70, 116-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.09.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Amandine, C., Olivier, G., Frédéric, J. and Sylvain, F. (2014) Utilisation de la spectrométrie infrarouge pour une quantification rapide du taux d’humidité dans des fibers végétales. Revue des composites et des matériaux avancés, Lavoisier, 24, 81-95. https://doi.org/10.3166/rcma.24.81-95</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Célino, A., Gon&amp;#231;alves, O., Jacquemin, F. and Fréour, S. (2014a) Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Water Sorption in Natural Fibres Using ATR-FTIR Spectroscopy. Carbohydrate Polymers, 101, 163-170.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thuault, A., Eve, S., Blond, D., Breard, J. and Gomina, M. (2014) Effects of the Hygrothermal Environment on the Mechanical Properties of Flax Fibers. Journal of Composite Materials, 48, 1699-1707. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998313490217</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Johar, N., Ahmad, I. and Dufresne, A. (2012) Extraction, Preparation and Characterization of Cellulose Fibers and Nanocrystals from Rice Husk. Industrial Crops and Products, 37, 93-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.12.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dai, D. and Fan, M. (2011) Investigation of the Dislocation of Natural Fibers by Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy. Vibrational Spectroscopy, 55, 300-306.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vibspec.2010.12.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">NagarajaGanesh, B., Ganeshan, P., Ramshankar, P. and Raja, K. (2019) Assessment of Natural Cellulosic Fibers Derived from Senna auriculata for Making Light Weight Industrial Biocomposites. Industrial Crops and Products, 139, Article ID: 111546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111546</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sango, T., Yona, A.M.C., Duchatel, L., Marin, A., Ndikontar, M.K., Joly, N. and Lefebvre, J.M. (2018) Step-Wise Multi-Scale Deconstruction of Banana Pseudo-Stem (Musa acuminata) Biomass and Morpho-Mechanical Characterization of Extracted Long Fibres for Sustainable Applications. Industrial Crops and Products, 122, 657-668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.06.050</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Célino, A., Gon&amp;#231;alves, O., Jacquemin, F. and Fréour, S. (2014) Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Water Sorption in Natural Fibers Using ATR-FTIR Spectroscopy. Carbohydrate Polymers, 101, 163-170.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.09.023</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moonart, U. and Utara, S. (2019) Effect of Surface Treatments and Filler Loading on the Properties of Hemp Fiber/Natural Rubber Composites. Cellulose, 26, 7271-7295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02611-w</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Krishnaiah, P., Ratnam, C.T. and Manickam, S. (2017) Enhancements in Crystallinity, Thermal Stability, Tensile Modulus and Strength of Sisal Fibres and Their PP Composites Induced by the Synergistic Effects of Alkali and High Intensity Ultrasound (HIU) Treatments. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 34, 729-742.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.07.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Faruk, O., Bledzki, A.K., Fink, H.P. and Sain, M. (2012) Biocomposites Reinforced with Natural Fibers: 2000-2010. Progress in Polymer Science, 37, 1552-1596.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tahir, Md.P., Ahmed, A.B., SifulAzry, S.O.A. and Ahmed, Z. (2011) Retting Process of Some Bast Plant Fibers and Its Effect on Fiber Quality: A Review. BioResources, 6, 5260-5281.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pereira, P.H.F., Rosa, M.D.F., Cioffi, M.O.H., Benini, K.C.C.D.C., Milanese, A.C., Voorwald, H.J.C. and Mulinari, D.R. (2015) Vegetal Fibers in Polymeric Composites: A Review. Polímeros, 25, 9-22. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-1428.1722</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, X., Tabil, L.G. and Panigrahi, S. (2007) Chemical Treatments of Natural Fiber for Use in Natural Fiber-Reinforced Composites: A Review. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 15, 25-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-006-0042-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gurunathan, T., Mohanty, S. and Nayak, S.K. (2015) A Review of the Recent Developments in Biocomposites Based on Natural Fibres and Their Application Perspectives. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 77, 1-25.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.06.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jeyapragash, R., Srinivasan, V. and Sathiyamurthy, S. (2020) Mechanical Properties of Natural Fiber/Particulate Reinforced Epoxy Composites: A Review of the Literature. Materials Today: Proceedings, 22, 1223-1227.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.146</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yao, F., Wu, Q., Lei, Y., Guo, W. and Xu, Y. (2008) Thermal Decomposition Kinetics of Natural Fibers: Activation Energy with Dynamic Thermogravimetric Analysis. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 93, 90-98.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.10.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Teixeira, F.P., Gomes, O.D.F.M. and de Andrade Silva, F. (2019) Degradation Mechanisms of Curaua, Hemp, and Sisal Fibers Exposed to Elevated Temperatures. BioResources, 14, 1494-1511.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fan, M., Dai, D. and Huang, B. (2012) Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy for Natural Fibers. Fourier Transform-Materials Analysis, 3, 45-68.  
https://doi.org/10.5772/35482</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sedan, D. (2007) Etude des interactions physico-chimiques aux interfaces fibers de chanvre/ciment: Influence sur les propriétés mécaniques du composite. Doctoral Dissertation, Limoges. https://doi.org/10.1051/mattech:2007038</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ornaghi, H.L., Poletto, M., Zattera, A.J. and Amico, S.C. (2014) Correlation of the Thermal Stability and the Decomposition Kinetics of Six Different Vegetal Fibers. Cellulose, 21, 177-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0094-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Deepa, B., Abraham, E., Cherian, B.M., Bismarck, A., Blaker, J.J., Pothan, L.A. and Kottaisamy, M. (2011) Structure, Morphology and Thermal Characteristics of Banana Nano Fibers Obtained by Steam Explosion. Bioresource Technology, 102, 1988-1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.030</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ntenga, R. (2007) Modélisation multi-échelle et caractérisation de l'anisotropie élastique de fibers végétales pour le renforcement de matériaux composites (Doctoral Dissertation).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.100652-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ateba, A., Evoung, Y.S.N., Ebanda, F.B., Laynde, T. and Tchinda, J.S. (2019) Morphological and Mechanical Characteristics of Neuropeltis Acuminatas (na) Fibers. International Journal of Academic Research and Reflection, 7, 25-31.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>